IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v12y2023i2p23-d1054408.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanie Streit

    (Chair of Mining Engineering and Mineral Economics, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria)

  • Michael Tost

    (Chair of Mining Engineering and Mineral Economics, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria)

  • Katharina Gugerell

    (Institute of Landscape Planning, Department of Landscape, Spatial- and Infrastructure Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Closure and revitalisation are essential steps in the life cycle of a mineral extraction site. Proper planning and execution can counteract potential negative impacts caused by extraction activities and allow a positive impact to be left on the post-closure region. Decisions on these steps are not made solely by the extraction company; legislators and the public also exert influence. Different opinions and expectations on closure and revitalisation can lead to tensions between actors. Thus, knowing diverse opinions and expectations and considering them in planning contributes to a successful implementation of measures. Using Q-methodology in a study focused on selected EIT RIS countries, we identified five viewpoints on the closure and revitalisation of an extraction site. The statements for this study have been developed based on international and company standards for closure and revitalisation, namely ICMM, IRMA, AngloAmerican and Rio Tinto, which we then also used for comparison in order to see how they relate to the five resulting viewpoints. Across all viewpoints, our results reveal a preference for environmental considerations, followed by social and economic concerns. Even though this paper considers closure and revitalisation separately from mineral extraction, these processes are intertwined. Thus, a sustainable planning and management of the extraction process itself contributes to a successful and sustainable post-closure landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanie Streit & Michael Tost & Katharina Gugerell, 2023. "Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:23-:d:1054408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/2/23/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/2/23/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Mills & Ian Simpson & W. Paul Adderley, 2014. "The lead legacy: the relationship between historical mining, pollution and the post-mining landscape," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 47-72, May.
    2. Sonja Kivinen, 2017. "Sustainable Post-Mining Land Use: Are Closed Metal Mines Abandoned or Re-Used Space?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Haque, Md. Aminul & Topal, Erkan & Lilford, Eric, 2014. "A numerical study for a mining project using real options valuation under commodity price uncertainty," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 115-123.
    4. Gregory, Gillian H., 2021. "Rendering mine closure governable and constraints to inclusive development in the Andean region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    5. Weldegiorgis, Fitsum S. & Ali, Saleem H., 2016. "Mineral resources and localised development: Q-methodology for rapid assessment of socioeconomic impacts in Rwanda," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Nguyen, B.N. & Boruff, B. & Tonts, M., 2018. "Indicators of mining in development: A Q‐methodology investigation of two gold mines in Quang Nam province, Vietnam," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 147-155.
    7. Otto, James M., 1997. "A national mineral policy as a regulatory tool," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 1-7, June.
    8. Bainton, Nicholas & Holcombe, Sarah, 2018. "A critical review of the social aspects of mine closure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 468-478.
    9. Robert Goodland, 2012. "Responsible Mining: The Key to Profitable Resource Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Michael Tost & Gloria Ammerer & Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska & Katharina Gugerell, 2021. "Mining and Europe’s World Heritage Cultural Landscapes," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Vela-Almeida, Diana & Kolinjivadi, Vijay & Kosoy, Nicolas, 2018. "The building of mining discourses and the politics of scale in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 188-198.
    12. Walsh, Bríd & van der Plank, Sien & Behrens, Paul, 2017. "The effect of community consultation on perceptions of a proposed mine: A case study from southeast Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 163-171.
    13. Shen, Lixin & Muduli, Kamalakanta & Barve, Akhilesh, 2015. "Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 15-26.
    14. Camelia Botezan & Veronica Constantin & Monika Meltzer & Andrei Radovici & Alina Pop & Filip Alexandrescu & Lucrina Stefanescu, 2020. "Is There Sustainable Development after Mining? A Case Study of Three Mining Areas in the Apuseni Region (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Maczkowiack, R.I. & Smith, C.S. & Slaughter, G.J. & Mulligan, D.R. & Cameron, D.C., 2012. "Grazing as a post-mining land use: A conceptual model of the risk factors," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 76-89.
    16. Yongjun Yang & Yue Li & Fu Chen & Shaoliang Zhang & Huping Hou, 2019. "Regime shift and redevelopment of a mining area’s socio-ecological system under resilience thinking: a case study in Shanxi Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 2577-2598, October.
    17. Anthony Bebbington & Denise Humphreys Bebbington, 2018. "Mining, movements and sustainable development: Concepts for a framework," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 441-449, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonja Kivinen, 2017. "Sustainable Post-Mining Land Use: Are Closed Metal Mines Abandoned or Re-Used Space?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Katarzyna Pactwa & Justyna Woźniak & Michał Dudek, 2020. "Sustainable Social and Environmental Evaluation of Post-Industrial Facilities in a Closed Loop Perspective in Coal-Mining Areas in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Aleksandra Kozłowska-Woszczycka & Katarzyna Pactwa, 2022. "Social License for Closure—A Participatory Approach to the Management of the Mine Closure Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Sonja Kivinen & Kaarina Vartiainen & Timo Kumpula, 2018. "People and Post-Mining Environments: PPGIS Mapping of Landscape Values, Knowledge Needs, and Future Perspectives in Northern Finland," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Gregory, Gillian H., 2021. "Rendering mine closure governable and constraints to inclusive development in the Andean region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Hámor-Vidó, Mária & Hámor, Tamás & Czirok, Lili, 2021. "Underground space, the legal governance of a critical resource in circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Nhi Ba Nguyen & Bryan Boruff & Matthew Tonts, 2019. "The Regulatory Framework and Minerals Development in Vietnam: An Assessment of Challenges and Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz, 2021. "Overlapping of natural stone mining field with high-speed train project in Turkey: Was the economic public benefit evaluation made sufficiently?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Raisa Pérez-Vas & Félix Puime Guillén & Joaquín Enríquez-Díaz, 2021. "Valuation of a Company Producing and Trading Seaweed for Human Consumption: Classical Methods vs. Real Options," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    12. Mohamed Marwan Al Heib & Christian Franck & Hippolyte Djizanne & Marie Degas, 2023. "Post-Mining Multi-Hazard Assessment for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Carlos Andres Zapata Quimbayo & Carlos Armando Mej¨ªa Vega, 2019. "Real Options Valuation in Gold Mining Projects under Multinomial Tree Approach," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 204-218, September.
    14. Yang Yu & Shen-En Chen & Ka-Zhong Deng & Peng Wang & Hong-Dong Fan, 2018. "Subsidence Mechanism and Stability Assessment Methods for Partial Extraction Mines for Sustainable Development of Mining Cities—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Deanna Kemp & John R. Owen, 2022. "Corporate social irresponsibility, hostile organisations and global resource extraction," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1816-1824, September.
    16. Nicholas A. Bainton & Glenn Banks, 2018. "Land and access: A framework for analysing mining, migration and development in Melanesia," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(5), pages 450-460, September.
    17. Magambo, Isaiah & Dikgang, Johane & Gelo, Dambala & Tregenna, Fiona, 2021. "Environmental and Technical Efficiency in Large Gold Mines in Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 108068, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Agung Dwi Sutrisno & Yun-Ju Chen & I Wayan Koko Suryawan & Chun-Hung Lee, 2023. "Building a Community’s Adaptive Capacity for Post-Mining Plans Based on Important Performance Analysis: Case Study from Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, June.
    19. John R. Owen & Deanna Kemp, 2024. "Corporate Responses to Community Grievance: Voluntarism and Pathologies of Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 55-68, January.
    20. Xiao, Chang & Florescu, Ionut & Zhou, Jinsheng, 2020. "A comparison of pricing models for mineral rights: Copper mine in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:23-:d:1054408. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.