IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v11y2022i11p100-d958130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation of Nearshore Wind Conditions Using Onshore Observation Data with Computational Fluid Dynamic and Mesoscale Models

Author

Listed:
  • Mizuki Konagaya

    (Rera Tech Inc., 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan
    Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)

  • Teruo Ohsawa

    (Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)

  • Toshinari Mito

    (Rera Tech Inc., 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)

  • Takeshi Misaki

    (Rera Tech Inc., 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan
    Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)

  • Taro Maruo

    (Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, 5-1-1 Fukae-minami, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658-0022, Japan)

  • Yasuyuki Baba

    (Shirahama Oceanographic Observatory, 2500-106 Katata, Shirahama, Nishimuro, Wakayama 649-2201, Japan)

Abstract

This study aimed to establish numerical models to replicate wind conditions for nearshore waters, sensitive to onshore topography, and to compare the characteristics of computational fluid dynamic (CFD) and mesoscale models. Vertical Doppler light detection and ranging (LiDAR) observation data were measured at an onshore site, which showed that wind conditions were affected by thermodynamic phenomena, such as land and sea breeze, and dynamical effects from neighboring onshore topography. The estimation accuracy of the CFD model depended on the height of the LiDAR data input. A height close to the target, such as the hub height of wind turbines, seemed appropriate as input data, considering that the accuracy of the wind speed shear replicated in a CFD numerical model may be uncertain. The mesoscale model replicated the wind through the thermodynamic effect and reliably estimated wind speed over nearshore waters without observation correction. Larger estimation errors were detected in the CFD model than in the mesoscale model, as the former could not account for thermodynamic effects. Wind conditions in water areas near complex coastlines may also be formed by thermodynamic factors, making analysis using a mesoscale model advantageous.

Suggested Citation

  • Mizuki Konagaya & Teruo Ohsawa & Toshinari Mito & Takeshi Misaki & Taro Maruo & Yasuyuki Baba, 2022. "Estimation of Nearshore Wind Conditions Using Onshore Observation Data with Computational Fluid Dynamic and Mesoscale Models," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:100-:d:958130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/11/100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/11/100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Gasset & Mathieu Landry & Yves Gagnon, 2012. "A Comparison of Wind Flow Models for Wind Resource Assessment in Wind Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Santos, C. Silva & Pereira, R., 2013. "Wind resource modelling in complex terrain using different mesoscale–microscale coupling techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 493-504.
    3. Mattar, Cristian & Borvarán, Dager, 2016. "Offshore wind power simulation by using WRF in the central coast of Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 22-31.
    4. Takeshi Misaki & Teruo Ohsawa & Mizuki Konagaya & Susumu Shimada & Yuko Takeyama & Satoshi Nakamura, 2019. "Accuracy Comparison of Coastal Wind Speeds between WRF Simulations Using Different Input Datasets in Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Lattawan Niyomtham & Charoenporn Lertsathittanakorn & Jompob Waewsak & Yves Gagnon, 2022. "Mesoscale/Microscale and CFD Modeling for Wind Resource Assessment: Application to the Andaman Coast of Southern Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carvalho, D. & Rocha, A. & Gómez-Gesteira, M. & Silva Santos, C., 2017. "Offshore winds and wind energy production estimates derived from ASCAT, OSCAT, numerical weather prediction models and buoys – A comparative study for the Iberian Peninsula Atlantic coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 433-444.
    2. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    3. González-Alonso de Linaje, N. & Mattar, C. & Borvarán, D., 2019. "Quantifying the wind energy potential differences using different WRF initial conditions on Mediterranean coast of Chile," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Yang, Xiaolei & Milliren, Christopher & Kistner, Matt & Hogg, Christopher & Marr, Jeff & Shen, Lian & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2021. "High-fidelity simulations and field measurements for characterizing wind fields in a utility-scale wind farm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    5. Lattawan Niyomtham & Charoenporn Lertsathittanakorn & Jompob Waewsak & Yves Gagnon, 2022. "Mesoscale/Microscale and CFD Modeling for Wind Resource Assessment: Application to the Andaman Coast of Southern Thailand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Wu, Chunlei & Luo, Kun & Wang, Qiang & Fan, Jianren, 2022. "A refined wind farm parameterization for the weather research and forecasting model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    7. Sward, J.A. & Ault, T.R. & Zhang, K.M., 2023. "Spatial biases revealed by LiDAR in a multiphysics WRF ensemble designed for offshore wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    8. Chancham, Chana & Waewsak, Jompob & Gagnon, Yves, 2017. "Offshore wind resource assessment and wind power plant optimization in the Gulf of Thailand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 706-731.
    9. Radünz, William Corrêa & Mattuella, Jussara M. Leite & Petry, Adriane Prisco, 2020. "Wind resource mapping and energy estimation in complex terrain: A framework based on field observations and computational fluid dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 494-515.
    10. Zhao, Jing & Guo, Zhen-Hai & Su, Zhong-Yue & Zhao, Zhi-Yuan & Xiao, Xia & Liu, Feng, 2016. "An improved multi-step forecasting model based on WRF ensembles and creative fuzzy systems for wind speed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 808-826.
    11. Alain Ulazia & Ander Nafarrate & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, 2019. "The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Chandel, S.S. & Ramasamy, P. & Murthy, K.S.R, 2014. "Wind power potential assessment of 12 locations in western Himalayan region of India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 530-545.
    13. Ulazia, Alain & Sáenz, Jon & Ibarra-Berastegi, Gabriel & González-Rojí, Santos J. & Carreno-Madinabeitia, Sheila, 2019. "Global estimations of wind energy potential considering seasonal air density changes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    14. Yang, Lin & Rojas, Jose I. & Montlaur, Adeline, 2020. "Advanced methodology for wind resource assessment near hydroelectric dams in complex mountainous areas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    15. Dhunny, A.Z. & Timmons, D.S. & Allam, Z. & Lollchund, M.R. & Cunden, T.S.M., 2020. "An economic assessment of near-shore wind farm development using a weather research forecast-based genetic algorithm model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    16. Nie, Bingchuan & Li, Jiachun, 2018. "Technical potential assessment of offshore wind energy over shallow continent shelf along China coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 391-399.
    17. Veronesi, F. & Grassi, S. & Raubal, M., 2016. "Statistical learning approach for wind resource assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 836-850.
    18. Waewsak, Jompob & Landry, Mathieu & Gagnon, Yves, 2015. "Offshore wind power potential of the Gulf of Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 609-626.
    19. Jin, Jingxin & Li, Yilin & Ye, Lin & Xu, Xunjian & Lu, Jiazheng, 2023. "Integration of atmospheric stability in wind resource assessment through multi-scale coupling method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    20. Deep, Sneh & Sarkar, Arnab & Ghawat, Mayur & Rajak, Manoj Kumar, 2020. "Estimation of the wind energy potential for coastal locations in India using the Weibull model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 319-339.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:11:y:2022:i:11:p:100-:d:958130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.