IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jpubli/v11y2023i2p22-d1114484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constraints on Research in Biological and Agricultural Science in Developing Countries: The Example of Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos S. Galina

    (Departamento de Reproducción, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • José F. Martínez

    (Departamento de Reproducción, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Bruce D. Murphy

    (Centre de Recherche en Reproduction et Fertilité, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada)

Abstract

Science is an international effort, receiving contributions from researchers across the globe. The capacity of a country or a region to generate and publish quality research varies greatly according to the location examined. Among the factors that dictate the quantity and quality of scientific research are the availability of infrastructure and human resources, the traditions related to research endeavors, and, most significantly, local governmental support for research. There are several conditions that both individually and cooperatively limit research activities in Latin America, such as insufficient governmental support, a paucity of material and technical resources, heavy teaching loads, the absence of peer networks, and multiple constraints on publication. This commentary has been developed to discuss each of the issues that permit and, more frequently, limit biological and agricultural research endeavors in Latin America.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos S. Galina & José F. Martínez & Bruce D. Murphy, 2023. "Constraints on Research in Biological and Agricultural Science in Developing Countries: The Example of Latin America," Publications, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:22-:d:1114484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/2/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/11/2/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miriam Palacios-Callender & Stephen A. Roberts, 2018. "Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: understanding relations between origin and destination countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 745-769, November.
    2. R. Lopez-Olmedo & R. Marmolejo-Leyva & M. A. Perez-Angon & L. L. Villa-Vazquez & E. Zayago-Lau, 2017. "The role of public policies in the decentralization process of Mexican science and the formation of new researchers in institutions outside the Mexico City area," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1343-1366, September.
    3. Franco M. Cabrerizo, 2022. "Open access in low-income countries — open letter on equity," Nature, Nature, vol. 605(7911), pages 620-620, May.
    4. Martijn Arns, 2014. "Open access is tiring out peer reviewers," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 467-467, November.
    5. Martin Sokol & Leonardo Pataccini, 2020. "Winners And Losers In Coronavirus Times: Financialisation, Financial Chains and Emerging Economic Geographies of The Covid‐19 Pandemic," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 401-415, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ismail Ragab Osman & Hendy Abdullah Hendy Ahmed, 2024. "Bibliometric analysis of Sci-Hub downloads by Egyptian researchers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(4), pages 2371-2388, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dell'Anno, Roberto & Caferra, Rocco & Morone, Andrea, 2020. "A “Trojan Horse” in the peer-review process of fee-charging economic journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3).
    2. Vincent Raoult, 2020. "How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    3. Rasa Kanapickiene & Deimante Teresiene & Daiva Budriene & Greta Keliuotytė-Staniulėnienė & Jekaterina Kartasova, 2020. "The Impact Of Covid-19 On European Financial Markets And Economic Sentiment," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 144-163.
    4. Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2024. "A decades—long partnership: examining the Cuba–China scientific collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(2), pages 785-802, February.
    5. Michail Kovanis & Ludovic Trinquart & Philippe Ravaud & Raphaël Porcher, 2017. "Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 651-671, October.
    6. Guillermo Armando Ronda-Pupo, 2023. "Mexico: a bridge in Cuba–U.S. scientific collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2301-2315, April.
    7. Richard Bůžek & Christoph Scheuplein, 2022. "The Global Wealth Chains of Private‐Equity‐Run Physician Practices," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(4), pages 331-347, September.
    8. Salandra, Rossella & Criscuolo, Paola & Salter, Ammon, 2021. "Directing scientists away from potentially biased publications: the role of systematic reviews in health care," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    9. Roberto Lopez-Olmedo & Miguel Angel Perez-Angon & Norma Georgina Gutiérrez-Serrano, 2019. "Participation of Mexican Civil Society Organizations in scientific publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 55-72, April.
    10. Paul Frijters & Benno Torgler, 2019. "Improving the peer review process: a proposed market system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1285-1288, May.
    11. Joanna Stawska & Ramona Rupeika-Apoga & Maciej Malaczewski & Iwona Dorota Czechowska & Fatima Sol Murta, 2022. "Financialization: curse or salvation? The case of Latvia, a small and post-transition economy," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 9(3), pages 173-197, March.
    12. María Elena Luna-Morales & Evelia Luna-Morales & Xochitl Flores-Vargas & Andrea Valencia-Martinez & Francisco Collazo-Reyes & Miguel Ángel Perez-Angon, 2022. "Reflections on the institutionalization process of scientific research in Latin America: the case of Cinvestav," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 661-681, January.
    13. Pedro Aceituno-Aceituno & Joaquín Danvila-del-Valle & Abel González García & Carlos Bousoño-Calzón, 2021. "Scientific Mobility, Training and Entrepreneurial Skills in Health Sciences: The Spanish Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Małgorzata Uhruska & Agnieszka Małkowska, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on the Work of Property Valuers: A Glance at the Polish State of Play," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Michail Kovanis & Raphaël Porcher & Philippe Ravaud & Ludovic Trinquart, 2016. "Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(2), pages 695-715, February.
    16. V. Hernández-González & A. Pano-Rodríguez & J. Reverter-Masia, 2020. "Spanish doctoral theses in physical activity and sports sciences and authors’ scientific publications (LUSTRUM 2013–2017)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 661-679, January.
    17. Baker, H. Kent & Kumar, Satish & Goyal, Kirti & Sharma, Anuj, 2021. "International review of financial analysis: A retrospective evaluation between 1992 and 2020," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    18. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Siddarth Srinivasan & Jamie Morgenstern, 2021. "Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review," Papers 2109.00923, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    20. Roberto Lopez-Olmedo & Norma Georgina Gutierrez-Serrano, 2021. "Transdisciplinary knowledge production in mainstream journals: from the perspective of the participation of social actors in Mexico," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2627-2641, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jpubli:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:22-:d:1114484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.