IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v8y2020i7p1181-d386369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On Partial Stochastic Comparisons Based on Tail Values at Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Alfonso J. Bello

    (Dpto. Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Julio Mulero

    (Dpto. Matemáticas, Universidad de Alicante, Ap. 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain)

  • Miguel A. Sordo

    (Dpto. Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Alfonso Suárez-Llorens

    (Dpto. Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain)

Abstract

The tail value at risk at level p , with p ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) , is a risk measure that captures the tail risk of losses and asset return distributions beyond the p quantile. Given two distributions, it can be used to decide which is riskier. When the tail values at risk of both distributions agree, whenever the probability level p ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) , about which of them is riskier, then the distributions are ordered in terms of the increasing convex order. The price to pay for such a unanimous agreement is that it is possible that two distributions cannot be compared despite our intuition that one is less risky than the other. In this paper, we introduce a family of stochastic orders, indexed by confidence levels p 0 ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) , that require agreement of tail values at risk only for levels p > p 0 . We study its main properties and compare it with other families of stochastic orders that have been proposed in the literature to compare tail risks. We illustrate the results with a real data example.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfonso J. Bello & Julio Mulero & Miguel A. Sordo & Alfonso Suárez-Llorens, 2020. "On Partial Stochastic Comparisons Based on Tail Values at Risk," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:7:p:1181-:d:386369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/7/1181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muller, Alfred, 1996. "Orderings of risks: A comparative study via stop-loss transforms," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 215-222, April.
    2. Shaun Wang, 1998. "An Actuarial Index of the Right-Tail Risk," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 88-101.
    3. Cheung, Ka Chun & Lo, Ambrose, 2013. "Characterizations of counter-monotonicity and upper comonotonicity by (tail) convex order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 334-342.
    4. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso & Bello, Alfonso J., 2015. "Comparison of conditional distributions in portfolios of dependent risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 62-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amaro, Raphael & Pinho, Carlos, 2022. "Energy commodities: A study on model selection for estimating Value-at-Risk," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 68, pages 5-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansour Shrahili & Mohamed Kayid, 2023. "Stochastic Orderings of the Idle Time of Inactive Standby Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Furman, Edward & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2008. "Weighted risk capital allocations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 263-269, October.
    3. López-Díaz, Miguel & Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso, 2012. "On the Lp-metric between a probability distribution and its distortion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 257-264.
    4. Wentao Hu & Cuixia Chen & Yufeng Shi & Ze Chen, 2022. "A Tail Measure With Variable Risk Tolerance: Application in Dynamic Portfolio Insurance Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 831-874, June.
    5. Ortega-Jiménez, P. & Sordo, M.A. & Suárez-Llorens, A., 2021. "Stochastic orders and multivariate measures of risk contagion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 199-207.
    6. Sun, Hongfang & Chen, Yu & Hu, Taizhong, 2022. "Statistical inference for tail-based cumulative residual entropy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 66-95.
    7. Albrecht, Peter, 2003. "Risk measures," Papers 03-01, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    8. Muller, Alfred, 1998. "Comparing risks with unbounded distributions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 229-239, September.
    9. Kaluszka, Marek, 2001. "Optimal reinsurance under mean-variance premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 61-67, February.
    10. Christian Kleiber & Walter Kraemer, 2000. "Efficiency, Equity, and Generalized Lorenz Dominance," CESifo Working Paper Series 343, CESifo.
    11. Denuit, Michel & Vermandele, Catherine, 1998. "Optimal reinsurance and stop-loss order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 229-233, July.
    12. Cheung, Ka Chun & Lo, Ambrose, 2013. "General lower bounds on convex functionals of aggregate sums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 884-896.
    13. Marcelo Brutti Righi & Paulo Sergio Ceretta, 2015. "Shortfall Deviation Risk: An alternative to risk measurement," Papers 1501.02007, arXiv.org, revised May 2016.
    14. Cheung, Ka Chun & Dhaene, Jan & Lo, Ambrose & Tang, Qihe, 2014. "Reducing risk by merging counter-monotonic risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 58-65.
    15. Sordo, Miguel A., 2016. "A multivariate extension of the increasing convex order to compare risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 224-230.
    16. Roman N. Schulze & Thomas Post, 2010. "Individual Annuity Demand Under Aggregate Mortality Risk," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 77(2), pages 423-449, June.
    17. Psarrakos, Georgios & Vliora, Polyxeni, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis and tail variability for the Wang’s actuarial index," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 147-152.
    18. Yang, Jianping & Hu, Taizhong, 2016. "New developments on the Lp-metric between a probability distribution and its distortion," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 236-243.
    19. Landsman, Zinoviy & Sherris, Michael, 2001. "Risk measures and insurance premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 103-115, August.
    20. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R., 1998. "Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus Yaari's dual theory of risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 145-161, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:8:y:2020:i:7:p:1181-:d:386369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.