IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i13p2108-d1689127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

M-Learning: Heuristic Approach for Delayed Rewards in Reinforcement Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Cesar Andrey Perdomo Charry

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 111611, Colombia)

  • Marlon Sneider Mora Cortes

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá 111611, Colombia)

  • Oscar J. Perdomo

    (Deptartment of Electrical and Electronic, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá 111321, Colombia)

Abstract

The current design of reinforcement learning methods requires extensive computational resources. Algorithms such as Deep Q-Network (DQN) have obtained outstanding results in advancing the field. However, the need to tune thousands of parameters and run millions of training episodes remains a significant challenge. This document proposes a comparative analysis between the Q-Learning algorithm, which laid the foundations for Deep Q-Learning, and our proposed method, termed M-Learning. The comparison is conducted using Markov Decision Processes with the delayed reward as a general test bench framework. Firstly, this document provides a full description of the main challenges related to implementing Q-Learning, particularly concerning its multiple parameters. Then, the foundations of our proposed heuristic are presented, including its formulation, and the algorithm is described in detail. The methodology used to compare both algorithms involved training them in the Frozen Lake environment. The experimental results, along with an analysis of the best solutions, demonstrate that our proposal requires fewer episodes and exhibits reduced variability in the outcomes. Specifically, M-Learning trains agents 30.7% faster in the deterministic environment and 61.66% faster in the stochastic environment. Additionally, it achieves greater consistency, reducing the standard deviation of scores by 58.37% and 49.75% in the deterministic and stochastic settings, respectively. The code will be made available in a GitHub repository upon this paper’s publication.

Suggested Citation

  • Cesar Andrey Perdomo Charry & Marlon Sneider Mora Cortes & Oscar J. Perdomo, 2025. "M-Learning: Heuristic Approach for Delayed Rewards in Reinforcement Learning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:13:p:2108-:d:1689127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/13/2108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/13/2108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ying Li & Hanyu Wang & Jiahao Fan & Yanyu Geng, 2022. "A novel Q-learning algorithm based on improved whale optimization algorithm for path planning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, December.
    2. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongxin Yu & Lihui Zhang & Meng Zhang & Fengyue Jin & Yibing Wang, 2024. "Coordinated Ramp Metering Considering the Dynamics of Mixed-Autonomy Traffic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Tulika Saha & Sriparna Saha & Pushpak Bhattacharyya, 2020. "Towards sentiment aided dialogue policy learning for multi-intent conversations using hierarchical reinforcement learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    3. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    4. Lixiang Zhang & Yan Yan & Yaoguang Hu, 2024. "Deep reinforcement learning for dynamic scheduling of energy-efficient automated guided vehicles," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(8), pages 3875-3888, December.
    5. Imen Azzouz & Wiem Fekih Hassen, 2023. "Optimization of Electric Vehicles Charging Scheduling Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Decentralized Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Benjamin Heinbach & Peter Burggräf & Johannes Wagner, 2024. "gym-flp: A Python Package for Training Reinforcement Learning Algorithms on Facility Layout Problems," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Jacob W. Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael A. Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," TSE Working Papers 17-806, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," IAST Working Papers 17-68, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    8. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    9. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Woo Jae Byun & Bumkyu Choi & Seongmin Kim & Joohyun Jo, 2023. "Practical Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Optimal Trade Execution," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    12. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Jiacheng Zhang & Haolan Zhang, 2025. "Towards Human-like Artificial Intelligence: A Review of Anthropomorphic Computing in AI and Future Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-49, June.
    14. Zhou, Zhipeng & Zhuo, Wen & Cui, Jianqiang & Luan, Haiying & Chen, Yudi & Lin, Dong, 2025. "Developing a deep reinforcement learning model for safety risk prediction at subway construction sites," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 257(PB).
    15. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    16. Pedro Reis & Ana Paula Serra & Jo~ao Gama, 2025. "The Role of Deep Learning in Financial Asset Management: A Systematic Review," Papers 2503.01591, arXiv.org.
    17. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    18. Zichen Lu & Ying Yan, 2024. "Temperature Control of Fuel Cell Based on PEI-DDPG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    19. Yang, Ting & Zhao, Liyuan & Li, Wei & Zomaya, Albert Y., 2021. "Dynamic energy dispatch strategy for integrated energy system based on improved deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen, 2020. "Operation performance comparison of CCHP systems with cascade waste heat recovery systems by simulation and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:13:p:2108-:d:1689127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.