IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i9p1380-d1387278.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Symmetry-Breaking Model for Stem Cell Differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Nikolaos K. Voulgarakis

    (Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA)

Abstract

Waddington envisioned stem cell differentiation as a marble rolling down a hill, passing through hierarchically branched valleys representing the cell’s temporal state. The terminal valleys at the bottom of the hill indicate the possible committed cells of the multicellular organism. Although originally proposed as a metaphor, Waddington’s hypothesis establishes the fundamental principles for characterizing the differentiation process as a dynamic system: the generated equilibrium points must exhibit hierarchical branching, robustness to perturbations (homeorhesis), and produce the appropriate number of cells for each cell type. This article aims to capture these characteristics using a mathematical model based on two fundamental hypotheses. First, it is assumed that the gene regulatory network consists of hierarchically coupled subnetworks of genes (modules), each modeled as a dynamical system exhibiting supercritical pitchfork or cusp bifurcation. Second, the gene modules are spatiotemporally regulated by feedback mechanisms originating from epigenetic factors. Analytical and numerical results show that the proposed model exhibits self-organized multistability with hierarchical branching. Moreover, these branches of equilibrium points are robust to perturbations, and the number of different cells produced can be determined by the system parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikolaos K. Voulgarakis, 2024. "Hierarchical Symmetry-Breaking Model for Stem Cell Differentiation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:9:p:1380-:d:1387278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/9/1380/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/9/1380/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Hanna & Krishanu Saha & Bernardo Pando & Jeroen van Zon & Christopher J. Lengner & Menno P. Creyghton & Alexander van Oudenaarden & Rudolf Jaenisch, 2009. "Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7273), pages 595-601, December.
    2. Leland H. Hartwell & John J. Hopfield & Stanislas Leibler & Andrew W. Murray, 1999. "From molecular to modular cell biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 402(6761), pages 47-52, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicola Bellomo & Richard Bingham & Mark A.J. Chaplain & Giovanni Dosi & Guido Forni & Damian A. Knopoff & John Lowengrub & Reidun Twarock & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "A multi-scale model of virus pandemic: Heterogeneous interactive entities in a globally connected world," LEM Papers Series 2020/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    2. Lazaros K Gallos & Fabricio Q Potiguar & José S Andrade Jr & Hernan A Makse, 2013. "IMDB Network Revisited: Unveiling Fractal and Modular Properties from a Typical Small-World Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    3. T. Ochiai & J. C. Nacher, 2007. "Stochastic analysis of autoregulatory gene expression dynamics," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 377-388, November.
    4. Qing-Ju Jiao & Yan-Kai Zhang & Lu-Ning Li & Hong-Bin Shen, 2011. "BinTree Seeking: A Novel Approach to Mine Both Bi-Sparse and Cohesive Modules in Protein Interaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Manfred Füllsack, 2011. "Firstness - As seen from the perspective of Complexity Research," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(1), pages 1-19.
    6. Francesco Panariello & Onelia Gagliano & Camilla Luni & Antonio Grimaldi & Silvia Angiolillo & Wei Qin & Anna Manfredi & Patrizia Annunziata & Shaked Slovin & Lorenzo Vaccaro & Sara Riccardo & Valenti, 2023. "Cellular population dynamics shape the route to human pluripotency," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Simeon D. Castle & Michiel Stock & Thomas E. Gorochowski, 2024. "Engineering is evolution: a perspective on design processes to engineer biology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Romualdo Pastor-Satorras & Eric Smith & Ricard V. Solé, 2002. "Evolving Protein Interaction Networks through Gene Duplication," Working Papers 02-02-008, Santa Fe Institute.
    9. Frederic Li Mow Chee & Bruno Beernaert & Billie G. C. Griffith & Alexander E. P. Loftus & Yatendra Kumar & Jimi C. Wills & Martin Lee & Jessica Valli & Ann P. Wheeler & J. Douglas Armstrong & Maddy Pa, 2023. "Mena regulates nesprin-2 to control actin–nuclear lamina associations, trans-nuclear membrane signalling and gene expression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Joshua S Weitz & Philip N Benfey & Ned S Wingreen, 2007. "Evolution, Interactions, and Biological Networks," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-3, January.
    11. Bo Xu & Hongfei Lin & Yang Chen & Zhihao Yang & Hongfang Liu, 2013. "Protein Complex Identification by Integrating Protein-Protein Interaction Evidence from Multiple Sources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Miguel Fribourg & Diomedes E Logothetis & Javier González-Maeso & Stuart C Sealfon & Belén Galocha-Iragüen & Fernando Las-Heras Andrés & Vladimir Brezina, 2017. "Elucidation of molecular kinetic schemes from macroscopic traces using system identification," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-34, February.
    13. Scholtens, Denise & Miron, Alexander & M. Merchant, Faisal & Miller, Arden & L. Miron, Penelope & Dirk Iglehart, J. & Gentleman, Robert, 2004. "Analyzing factorial designed microarray experiments," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 19-43, July.
    14. Robrecht Cannoodt & Joeri Ruyssinck & Jan Ramon & Katleen De Preter & Yvan Saeys, 2018. "IncGraph: Incremental graphlet counting for topology optimisation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    15. Margaritis Voliotis & Philipp Thomas & Ramon Grima & Clive G Bowsher, 2016. "Stochastic Simulation of Biomolecular Networks in Dynamic Environments," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Pilar García-Peñarrubia & Juan J Gálvez & Jesús Gálvez, 2011. "Spatio-Temporal Dependence of the Signaling Response in Immune-Receptor Trafficking Networks Regulated by Cell Density: A Theoretical Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-12, July.
    17. Emre Guney & Baldo Oliva, 2014. "Analysis of the Robustness of Network-Based Disease-Gene Prioritization Methods Reveals Redundancy in the Human Interactome and Functional Diversity of Disease-Genes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    18. Cui, Xue-Mei & Yoon, Chang No & Youn, Hyejin & Lee, Sang Hoon & Jung, Jean S. & Han, Seung Kee, 2017. "Dynamic burstiness of word-occurrence and network modularity in textbook systems," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 487(C), pages 103-110.
    19. Zheng Hong, 2019. "A novel individualized drug repositioning approach for predicting personalized candidate drugs for type 1 diabetes mellitus," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(5), pages 1-9, October.
    20. Zhang, Yuerong & Marshall, Stephen & Manley, Ed, 2021. "Understanding the roles of rail stations: Insights from network approaches in the London metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:9:p:1380-:d:1387278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.