IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i21p3332-d1505175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nested Sentiment Analysis for ESG Impact: Leveraging FinBERT to Predict Market Dynamics Based on Eco-Friendly and Non-Eco-Friendly Product Perceptions with Explainable AI

Author

Listed:
  • Aradhana Saxena

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • A. Santhanavijayan

    (Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Harish Kumar Shakya

    (Department of AIML, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur 303007, Rajasthan, India)

  • Gyanendra Kumar

    (Department of IoT and Intelligent Systems, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur 303007, Rajasthan, India)

  • Balamurugan Balusamy

    (Office of Dean of Academics, Shiv Nadar University, Delhi-NCR Campus, Noida 201305, Uttar Pradesh, India)

  • Francesco Benedetto

    (Economics Department, University of ROMA TRE, Via Silvio D’Amico 77, 00145 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

In the current era, the environmental component of ESG is recognized as a major driver due to the pressing challenges posed by climate change, population growth, global warming, and shifting weather patterns. The environment must be considered a critical factor, and as evidenced by existing research, it is regarded as the dominant component within ESG. In this study, the ESG score is derived primarily from the environmental score. The increasing importance of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in financial markets, along with the growing need for sentiment analysis in sustainability, has necessitated the development of advanced sentiment analysis techniques. A predictive model has been introduced utilizing a nested sentiment analysis framework, which classifies sentiments towards eco-friendly and non-eco-friendly products, as well as positive and negative sentiments, using FinBERT. The model has been optimized with the AdamW optimizer, L2 regularization, and dropout to assess how sentiments related to these product types influence ESG metrics. The “black-box” nature of the model has been addressed through the application of explainable AI (XAI) to enhance its interpretability. The model demonstrated an accuracy of 91.76% in predicting ESG scores and 99% in sentiment classification. The integration of XAI improves the transparency of the model’s predictions, making it a valuable tool for decision-making in making sustainable investments. This research is aligned with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 12 and SDG 13), contributing to the promotion of sustainable practices and fostering improved market dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Aradhana Saxena & A. Santhanavijayan & Harish Kumar Shakya & Gyanendra Kumar & Balamurugan Balusamy & Francesco Benedetto, 2024. "Nested Sentiment Analysis for ESG Impact: Leveraging FinBERT to Predict Market Dynamics Based on Eco-Friendly and Non-Eco-Friendly Product Perceptions with Explainable AI," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:21:p:3332-:d:1505175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/21/3332/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/21/3332/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Priyank Sonkiya & Vikas Bajpai & Anukriti Bansal, 2021. "Stock price prediction using BERT and GAN," Papers 2107.09055, arXiv.org.
    2. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Livio Cricelli & Roberto Mauriello & Serena Strazzullo, 2023. "Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Rusitha Wijekoon & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2021. "Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-40, May.
    4. Wu, Wei & Xu, Meiqi & Su, Ruiqian & Ullah, Kaleem, 2024. "Modeling crude oil volatility using economic sentiment analysis and opinion mining of investors via deep learning and machine learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    5. Frank Xing, 2024. "Designing Heterogeneous LLM Agents for Financial Sentiment Analysis," Papers 2401.05799, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Dobbelstein & Carina Lochner, 2023. "Factors influencing purchase intention for recycled products: A comparative analysis of Germany and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2256-2277, August.
    2. Edin Güçlü Sözer & Mustafa Emre Civelek & Adnan Veysel Ertemel & Mustafa Çağrı Pehlivanoğlu, 2024. "The Determinants of Green Purchasing in the Hospitality Sector: A Study on the Mediation Effect of LOHAS Orientation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Luigi Leclercq-Machado & Aldo Alvarez-Risco & Romina Gómez-Prado & Berdy Briggitte Cuya-Velásquez & Sharon Esquerre-Botton & Flavio Morales-Ríos & Camila Almanza-Cruz & Sarahit Castillo-Benancio & Mar, 2022. "Sustainable Fashion and Consumption Patterns in Peru: An Environmental-Attitude-Intention-Behavior Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Jung-Chieh Lee & Ting Li & Lihui Zhang, 2025. "Environmental concerns and green trust in continuous green fintech use: an expectation-confirmation model with insights from Ant Forest," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Sandile Mkhize & Debbie Ellis, 2024. "Organic consumption as a means to achieve sustainable development goals and agenda 2063," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 5181-5192, October.
    6. Ryan Quek Wei Heng & Edoardo Vittori & Keane Ong & Rui Mao & Erik Cambria & Gianmarco Mengaldo, 2025. "Leveraging LLMS for Top-Down Sector Allocation In Automated Trading," Papers 2503.09647, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    7. Naman Sreen & Swetarupa Chatterjee & Seema Bhardwaj & Asmita Chitnis, 2023. "Reasons and intuitions: extending behavioural reasoning theory to determine green purchase behavior," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 20(2), pages 447-475, June.
    8. Yuze Lu & Hailong Zhang & Qiwen Guo, 2023. "Stock and market index prediction using Informer network," Papers 2305.14382, arXiv.org.
    9. Liping Wang & Jiawei Li & Lifan Zhao & Zhizhuo Kou & Xiaohan Wang & Xinyi Zhu & Hao Wang & Yanyan Shen & Lei Chen, 2023. "Methods for Acquiring and Incorporating Knowledge into Stock Price Prediction: A Survey," Papers 2308.04947, arXiv.org.
    10. Duygu Ider & Stefan Lessmann, 2022. "Forecasting Cryptocurrency Returns from Sentiment Signals: An Analysis of BERT Classifiers and Weak Supervision," Papers 2204.05781, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    11. Dimitrios Theocharis & Georgios Tsekouropoulos, 2025. "Sustainable Consumption and Branding for Gen Z: How Brand Dimensions Influence Consumer Behavior and Adoption of Newly Launched Technological Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-40, May.
    12. Hoshiar Mal & Nagendra Singh Nehra, 2023. "The Impact of IoT Characteristics, Cultural Factors and Safety Concerns on Consumer Purchase Intention of Green Electronic Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Vanessa Effendy & Zengrui Xiao, 2025. "How Does Cultural Sustainability Promote Fashion Consumers’ Purchase Intention?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, February.
    14. Hiroko Oe & Yasuyuki Yamaoka & Hiroko Ochiai, 2023. "Personal and Emotional Values Embedded in Thai-Consumers’ Perceptions: Key Factors for the Sustainability of Traditional Confectionery Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Zhicheng Zeng & Wenjun Zhong & Shumaila Naz, 2023. "Can Environmental Knowledge and Risk Perception Make a Difference? The Role of Environmental Concern and Pro-Environmental Behavior in Fostering Sustainable Consumption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    16. Megawati Simanjuntak & Nidya Luthfi Nafila & Lilik Noor Yuliati & Irni Rahmayani Johan & Mukhamad Najib & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2023. "Environmental Care Attitudes and Intention to Purchase Green Products: Impact of Environmental Knowledge, Word of Mouth, and Green Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    17. Huifang Ma & Weidong Chen & Hailin Ma & Hude Yang, 2021. "Influence of Publicity and Education and Environmental Values on the Green Consumption Behavior of Urban Residents in Tibet," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Julien Geissmar & Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus, 2023. "Surprisingly unsustainable: How and when hindsight biases shape consumer evaluations of unsustainable and sustainable products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5969-5991, December.
    19. Pankaj Tiwari, 2023. "Analysing Green Self-efficacy and Green Altruism of Millennials Customers Toward Green Purchases Through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1545-1561, December.
    20. Mohamad Alif Akmar Sher Mohamad & Zurena@Rena Shahril, 2025. "Consumer Readiness on the Sustainable Practices of Green Technology in Fast Food Restaurant," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 4881-4895, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:21:p:3332-:d:1505175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.