IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i23p4782-d1288621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveiling Deep Learning Insights: A Specialized Analysis of Sucker Rod Pump Dynamographs, Emphasizing Visualizations and Human Insight

Author

Listed:
  • Bojan Martinović

    (Scientific and Technology Center NIS—Naftagas, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milos Bijanić

    (Faculty of Organizational Science, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dusan Danilović

    (Faculty of Mining and Geology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Andrija Petrović

    (Faculty of Organizational Science, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Boris Delibasić

    (Faculty of Organizational Science, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

This study delves into the heightened efficiency and accuracy of 11 deep learning models classifying 11 dynamograph classes in the oil production sector. Introducing a novel framework with the Grad–CAM method, we address the “black box” issue, providing transparency in the models’ decision-making processes. Our analysis includes a comparative study with human experts, revealing a comprehensive understanding of both machine and human interpretive strategies. Results highlight the notable speed and precision of machine learning models, marking a significant advancement in rapid, reliable dynamograph classification for oil production decision-making. Additionally, nuanced findings in the model’s diagnostic accuracy reveal limitations in situations featuring the simultaneous occurrence of multiple pump issues. This underscores the need for additional features and domain-specific logic to enhance discernment and diagnostic precision in complex scenarios. The exploration of qualitative aspects distinguishes interpretive approaches, highlighting strengths and limitations. Machines, driven by algorithmic patterns and data processing, excel in rapid identification, albeit with occasional misclassifications. In contrast, human experts leverage experience and domain-specific knowledge for nuanced interpretation, providing a comprehensive understanding of both quantitative metrics and qualitative nuances. In conclusion, this study not only demonstrates the accelerated and enhanced accuracy of dynamograph classification by machine learning models compared to junior and medior domain experts, but also provides valuable insights into specific features and patterns guiding the decision-making process. This understanding allows continuous refinement, combining machine speed with human understanding for improved results in oil production. The potential for further studies and improvements in this domain is substantial.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojan Martinović & Milos Bijanić & Dusan Danilović & Andrija Petrović & Boris Delibasić, 2023. "Unveiling Deep Learning Insights: A Specialized Analysis of Sucker Rod Pump Dynamographs, Emphasizing Visualizations and Human Insight," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-29, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:23:p:4782-:d:1288621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/23/4782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/23/4782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Janiesch & Patrick Zschech & Kai Heinrich, 2021. "Machine learning and deep learning," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 685-695, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jen-Yu Lee & Tien-Thinh Nguyen & Hong-Giang Nguyen & Jen-Yao Lee, 2022. "Towards Predictive Crude Oil Purchase: A Case Study in the USA and Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Eduard Hartwich & Alexander Rieger & Johannes Sedlmeir & Dominik Jurek & Gilbert Fridgen, 2023. "Machine economies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Rainer Alt, 2021. "Electronic Markets on robotics," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 465-471, September.
    4. Abhirup Khanna & Bhawna Yadav Lamba & Sapna Jain & Vadim Bolshev & Dmitry Budnikov & Vladimir Panchenko & Alexandr Smirnov, 2023. "Biodiesel Production from Jatropha: A Computational Approach by Means of Artificial Intelligence and Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Rui Ma & Jia Wang & Wei Zhao & Hongjie Guo & Dongnan Dai & Yuliang Yun & Li Li & Fengqi Hao & Jinqiang Bai & Dexin Ma, 2022. "Identification of Maize Seed Varieties Using MobileNetV2 with Improved Attention Mechanism CBAM," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Dylan Norbert Gono & Herlina Napitupulu & Firdaniza, 2023. "Silver Price Forecasting Using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Cheng Yang & Fuhao Sun & Yujie Zou & Zhipeng Lv & Liang Xue & Chao Jiang & Shuangyu Liu & Bochao Zhao & Haoyang Cui, 2024. "A Survey of Photovoltaic Panel Overlay and Fault Detection Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-37, February.
    8. Shuai Sang & Lu Li, 2024. "A Novel Variant of LSTM Stock Prediction Method Incorporating Attention Mechanism," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Vladimir Franki & Darin Majnarić & Alfredo Višković, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Companies in the Power Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, January.
    10. Thomas Grisold & Christian Janiesch & Maximilian Röglinger & Moe Thandar Wynn, 2022. "Call for Papers, Issue 5/2024," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 841-843, December.
    11. Joshua Holstein & Max Schemmer & Johannes Jakubik & Michael Vössing & Gerhard Satzger, 2023. "Sanitizing data for analysis: Designing systems for data understanding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Jonas Wanner & Lukas-Valentin Herm & Kai Heinrich & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2079-2102, December.
    13. Yuanyuan Yang & Md Muhie Menul Haque & Dongling Bai & Wei Tang, 2021. "Fault Diagnosis of Electric Motors Using Deep Learning Algorithms and Its Application: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    14. Patrick Zschech, 2023. "Beyond descriptive taxonomies in data analytics: a systematic evaluation approach for data-driven method pipelines," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 193-227, March.
    15. Wendou Yan & Xiuying Wang & Shoubiao Tan, 2022. "YOLO-DFAN: Effective High-Altitude Safety Belt Detection Network," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, November.
    16. Julius Peter Landwehr & Niklas Kühl & Jannis Walk & Mario Gnädig, 2022. "Design Knowledge for Deep-Learning-Enabled Image-Based Decision Support Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 64(6), pages 707-728, December.
    17. Michael Weber & Martin Engert & Norman Schaffer & Jörg Weking & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Organizational Capabilities for AI Implementation—Coping with Inscrutability and Data Dependency in AI," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1549-1569, August.
    18. Rashid Amin & Muzammal Majeed & Farrukh Shoukat Ali & Adeel Ahmed & Mudassar Hussain, 2022. "Reliability Awareness Multiple Path Installation in Software Defined Networking using Machine Learning Algorithm," International Journal of Innovations in Science & Technology, 50sea, vol. 4(5), pages 158-172, July.
    19. Kalliopi Kanaki & Michail Kalogiannakis & Emmanouil Poulakis & Panagiotis Politis, 2022. "Investigating the Association between Algorithmic Thinking and Performance in Environmental Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    20. Rafael Magdalena-Benedicto & Sonia Pérez-Díaz & Adrià Costa-Roig, 2023. "Challenges and Opportunities in Machine Learning for Geometry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:23:p:4782-:d:1288621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.