IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i13p2820-d1177637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Controlling the Operating Modes of the Stabilization Column of the Primary Oil-Refining Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Batyr Orazbayev

    (Department of System Analysis and Control, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Yerbol Ospanov

    (Department of Automation and Information Technology, Shakarim University, Semey 070014, Kazakhstan)

  • Valentina Makhatova

    (Department of Software Engineering, Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University, Atyrau 010008, Kazakhstan)

  • Lazzat Salybek

    (Department of Automation, Telecommunications, M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan)

  • Zhanat Abdugulova

    (Department of System Analysis and Control, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Zhumazhan Kulmagambetova

    (Department of Informatics and Information Technologies, Aktobe Regional University Named after K. Zhubanov, Aktobe 030212, Kazakhstan)

  • Salamat Suleimenova

    (Department of System Analysis and Control, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

  • Kulman Orazbayeva

    (Faculty of Business and Management, Esil University, Astana 010005, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

Many technological systems are characterized by fuzzy initial information, necessary for the development of their models, optimization and control of operating modes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to formulate decision making problems for optimizing and controlling operating modes of such systems in a fuzzy environment and to develop methods for solving them. The developed heuristic methods of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making are based on the modification and combination of different principles of optimality. The proposed methods based on system models, knowledge and experience of the decision maker allow iterative improvement and effective decision making. On the basis of experimental–statistical methods, methods of expert evaluation, statistical and fuzzy models of the stabilization column have been developed. The conditions for judging the fuzzy model’s effectiveness are determined and investigated. Using the proposed heuristic method based on the main criterion and maximin, the problem of two-criterion optimization of the stabilization column parameters in a fuzzy environment is solved. The results obtained confirm the advantages of the proposed method of fuzzy decision making in comparison with the results of known methods. The developed heuristic methods differ from known ones because they allow making adequate decisions in a fuzzy environment by maximizing the use of the collected fuzzy information.

Suggested Citation

  • Batyr Orazbayev & Yerbol Ospanov & Valentina Makhatova & Lazzat Salybek & Zhanat Abdugulova & Zhumazhan Kulmagambetova & Salamat Suleimenova & Kulman Orazbayeva, 2023. "Methods of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Controlling the Operating Modes of the Stabilization Column of the Primary Oil-Refining Unit," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:2820-:d:1177637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/2820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/13/2820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fenghua Chen & Xinguo Qiu & Khalid A. Alattas & Ardashir Mohammadzadeh & Ebrahim Ghaderpour, 2022. "A New Fuzzy Robust Control for Linear Parameter-Varying Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Cengiz Kahraman, 2008. "Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods and Fuzzy Sets," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Cengiz Kahraman (ed.), Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making, pages 1-18, Springer.
    3. Weiwei Zhuang & Yadong Li & Guoxin Qiu, 2022. "Statistical inference for a relaxation index of stochastic dominance under density ratio model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(15), pages 3804-3822, November.
    4. Batyr Orazbayev & Ainur Zhumadillayeva & Kulman Orazbayeva & Sandugash Iskakova & Balbupe Utenova & Farit Gazizov & Svetlana Ilyashenko & Olga Afanaseva, 2022. "The System of Models and Optimization of Operating Modes of a Catalytic Reforming Unit Using Initial Fuzzy Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Mihail Radev, 2017. "Using the TOPSIS Method to Evaluate Projects for Virtualization," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, issue 2, pages 234-241, November.
    6. Meng Xia & Fujun Zhang, 2020. "Application of Multi-Parameter Fuzzy Optimization to Enhance Performance of a Regulated Two-Stage Turbocharged Diesel Engine Operating at High Altitude," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lingqin Xia & Guang Chen & Tao Wu & Yu Gao & Ardashir Mohammadzadeh & Ebrahim Ghaderpour, 2022. "Optimal Intelligent Control for Doubly Fed Induction Generators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Mehdi Toloo & Rouhollah Khodabandelou & Amar Oukil, 2022. "A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Fractional Programming (1965–2020)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Pavel Petrov & Shabnamjit Hundal, 2018. "Application of Security Technologies in the Public Websites of Banks in Serbia," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 7(2), pages 298-305, November.
    4. Liu, Shuang & Proctor, Wendy & Cook, David, 2010. "Using an integrated fuzzy set and deliberative multi-criteria evaluation approach to facilitate decision-making in invasive species management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 2374-2382, October.
    5. Pei Yin & Jing Cheng & Miaojuan Peng, 2022. "Analyzing the Passenger Flow of Urban Rail Transit Stations by Using Entropy Weight-Grey Correlation Model: A Case Study of Shanghai in China," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Mimica R. Milošević & Miloš M. Nikolić & Dušan M. Milošević & Violeta Dimić, 2022. "Managing Resources Based on Influential Indicators for Sustainable Economic Development: A Case Study in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Bihter Gizem Demircan & Kaan Yetilmezsoy, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Implementation of Smart Sustainable Waste Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Svetoslav Ivanov & Pavel Petrov, 2020. "Business scenarios for interaction in the development of the software system in a start-up software company," Economics and computer science, Publishing house "Knowledge and business" Varna, issue 2, pages 27-37.
    9. Cengiz Kahraman & Sezi Cevik Onar & Basar Oztaysi, 2016. "A Comparison of Wind Energy Investment Alternatives Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Benefit/Cost Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Alireza Valipour & Hadi Sarvari & Jolanta Tamošaitiene, 2018. "Risk Assessment in PPP Projects by Applying Different MCDM Methods and Comparative Results Analysis," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Ramachandramoorthi Shanmugapriya & Perichetla Kandaswamy Hemalatha & Lenka Cepova & Jiri Struz, 2023. "A Study of Independency on Fuzzy Resolving Sets of Labelling Graphs," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-9, August.
    12. Shirzadi, Somayeh & Sabouhi, Mahmood & Kenari, Reza Esfanjari, 2015. "Sustainable Management of Saravan Sylvan Park Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 5(3), September.
    13. Baoan Song & Qiyu Sun & Ying Li & Chuanqi Que, 2016. "Evaluating the Sustainability of Community-Based Long-Term Care Programmes: A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Balezentiene, Ligita & Streimikiene, Dalia & Balezentis, Tomas, 2013. "Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 83-93.
    15. Batyr Orazbayev & Ainur Zhumadillayeva & Kulman Orazbayeva & Sandugash Iskakova & Balbupe Utenova & Farit Gazizov & Svetlana Ilyashenko & Olga Afanaseva, 2022. "The System of Models and Optimization of Operating Modes of a Catalytic Reforming Unit Using Initial Fuzzy Information," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Hayk Manucharyan, 2020. "Dealing with uncertainties of green supplier selection: a fuzzy approach," Working Papers 2020-13, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    17. Jian Chen & Jiajun Zhu & Xu Qin & Wenxiang Xie, 2023. "Reducing Octane Number Loss in Gasoline Refining Process by Using the Improved Sparrow Search Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Haris Doukas, 2017. "Analysis of policy scenarios for achieving renewable energy sources targets: A fuzzy TOPSIS approach," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(1-2), pages 88-109, March.
    19. Marcus V. C. Fagundes & Bernd Hellingrath & Francisco G. M. Freires, 2021. "Supplier Selection Risk: A New Computer-Based Decision-Making System with Fuzzy Extended AHP," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Govind Kharat, Manoj & Murthy, Shankar & Jaisingh Kamble, Sheetal & Raut, Rakesh D. & Kamble, Sachin S. & Govind Kharat, Mukesh, 2019. "Fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis for environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 20-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:13:p:2820-:d:1177637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.