IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i12p2709-d1171732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short Memory-Based Human Strategy Modeling in Social Dilemmas

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang-Hao Yang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Hui-Yun Huang

    (School of Management, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai 201620, China)

  • Yi-Chao Zhang

    (Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Jia-Sheng Wang

    (Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Ji-Hong Guan

    (Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Shui-Geng Zhou

    (School of Computer Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Human decision-making processes are complex. It is thus challenging to mine human strategies from real games in social networks. To model human strategies in social dilemmas, we conducted a series of human subject experiments in which the temporal two-player non-cooperative games among 1092 players were intensively investigated. Our goal is to model the individuals’ moves in the next round based on the information observed in each round. Therefore, the developed model is a strategy model based on short-term memory. Due to the diversity of user strategies, we first cluster players’ behaviors to aggregate them with similar strategies for the following modeling. Through behavior clustering, our observations show that the performance of the tested binary strategy models can be highly promoted in the largest behavior groups. Our results also suggest that no matter whether in the classical mode or the dissipative mode, the influence of individual accumulated payoffs on individual behavior is more significant than the gaming result of the last round. This result challenges a previous consensus that individual moves largely depend on the gaming result of the last round. Therefore, our model provides a novel perspective for understanding the evolution of human altruistic behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang-Hao Yang & Hui-Yun Huang & Yi-Chao Zhang & Jia-Sheng Wang & Ji-Hong Guan & Shui-Geng Zhou, 2023. "Short Memory-Based Human Strategy Modeling in Social Dilemmas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:2709-:d:1171732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/12/2709/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/12/2709/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hisashi Ohtsuki & Christoph Hauert & Erez Lieberman & Martin A. Nowak, 2006. "A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7092), pages 502-505, May.
    2. Siddharth Suri & Duncan J Watts, 2011. "Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. David Melamed & Ashley Harrell & Brent Simpson, 2018. "Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 115(5), pages 951-956, January.
    4. Simon Gachter & Ernst Fehr, 2000. "Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(4), pages 980-994, September.
    5. Zhang, Zhiming & Ren, Da & Lan, Yanfei & Yang, Shanxue, 2022. "Price competition and blockchain adoption in retailing markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 647-660.
    6. Yang, Han-Xin & Rong, Zhihai, 2015. "Mutual punishment promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 230-234.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yali Dong & Cong Li & Yi Tao & Boyu Zhang, 2015. "Evolution of Conformity in Social Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Paul E Smaldino & Mark Lubell, 2011. "An Institutional Mechanism for Assortment in an Ecology of Games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-7, August.
    3. Peng Liu & Haoxiang Xia, 2015. "Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(1), pages 101-134, April.
    4. Quan, Ji & Cui, Shihui & Chen, Wenman & Wang, Xianjia, 2023. "Reputation-based probabilistic punishment on the evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    5. Takahiro Ezaki & Naoki Masuda, 2017. "Reinforcement learning account of network reciprocity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Arno Riedl & Ingrid M. T. Rohde & Martin Strobel, 2021. "Free Neighborhood Choice Boosts Socially Optimal Outcomes in Stag-Hunt Coordination Problem," CESifo Working Paper Series 9012, CESifo.
    7. Shimpei Koike & Mayuko Nakamaru & Tokinao Otaka & Hajime Shimao & Ken-Ichi Shimomura & Takehiko Yamato, 2018. "Reciprocity and exclusion in informal financial institutions: An experimental study of rotating savings and credit associations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Jelena Grujić & Torsten Röhl & Dirk Semmann & Manfred Milinski & Arne Traulsen, 2012. "Consistent Strategy Updating in Spatial and Non-Spatial Behavioral Experiments Does Not Promote Cooperation in Social Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-8, November.
    9. repec:cup:judgdm:v:9:y:2014:i:6:p:523-547 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Antonio A. Arechar & Simon Gächter & Lucas Molleman, 2018. "Conducting interactive experiments online," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(1), pages 99-131, March.
    11. John Horton & David Rand & Richard Zeckhauser, 2011. "The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(3), pages 399-425, September.
    12. Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Wang, Peng & Ma, Jun-Chao & Zhu, Peican & Han, Zhen & Podobnik, Boris & Stanley, H. Eugene & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Alfaro-Bittner, Karin & Boccaletti, Stefano, 2023. "Unraveling the effects of network, direct and indirect reciprocity in online societies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Wang, Shengxian & Chen, Xiaojie & Xiao, Zhilong & Szolnoki, Attila, 2022. "Decentralized incentives for general well-being in networked public goods game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    14. Grolleau, Gilles & Sutan, Angela & Vranceanu, Radu, 2016. "Do people contribute more to intra-temporal or inter-temporal public goods?," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 186-195.
    15. Fabio Della Rossa & Fabio Dercole & Anna Di Meglio, 2020. "Direct Reciprocity and Model-Predictive Strategy Update Explain the Network Reciprocity Observed in Socioeconomic Networks," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Marco Faravelli & Kenan Kalayci & Carlos Pimienta, 2020. "Costly voting: a large-scale real effort experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 468-492, June.
    17. Kasper Otten & Ulrich J. Frey & Vincent Buskens & Wojtek Przepiorka & Naomi Ellemers, 2022. "Human cooperation in changing groups in a large-scale public goods game," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Amado, André & Huang, Weini & Campos, Paulo R.A. & Ferreira, Fernando Fagundes, 2015. "Learning process in public goods games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 430(C), pages 21-31.
    19. Wang, Jianwei & Yu, Fengyuan & He, Jialu & Chen, Wei & Xu, Wenshu & Dai, Wenhui & Ming, Yuexin, 2023. "Promotion, Disintegration and Remediation of group cooperation under heterogeneous distribution system based on peer rating," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    20. Hadzibeganovic, Tarik & Stauffer, Dietrich & Han, Xiao-Pu, 2018. "Interplay between cooperation-enhancing mechanisms in evolutionary games with tag-mediated interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 676-690.
    21. José M Galán & Maciej M Łatek & Seyed M Mussavi Rizi, 2011. "Axelrod's Metanorm Games on Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:12:p:2709-:d:1171732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.