IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i22p4334-d977198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interactive Impacts of Overconfidence and Competitive Preference on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Xu

    (Department of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100021, China)

  • Kaiye Gao

    (School of Economics & Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100096, China)

  • Yuanying Chi

    (Department of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100021, China)

  • Yahui Chen

    (Department of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100021, China)

  • Rui Peng

    (Department of Economics & Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100021, China)

Abstract

As sustainable development becomes an important goal for all industries, the study of closed-loop supply chains has gradually become a priority. Most of the previous studies on closed-loop supply chains are based on simple and single market conditions, which cannot analyze the real situation well. In this paper, two common behavioral preferences in the market, overconfidence and competitive preference, are incorporated into the study of closed-loop supply chains to investigate how the overconfidence of retailers and the competitive preference of manufacturers jointly affect the decisions and interests of both parties in closed-loop supply chains under different dominant models. It is concluded that in terms of pricing, while the wholesale price increases in the competitive preference, the reselling price in fact decreases when the retailer’s overconfidence level is of a middle level; in terms of recycling, the pursuit of high profits by monopolistic manufacturers is not conducive to recycling quantity in the secondary supply chain with recycling; in terms of profits, in a manufacturer-led model, the profits of all sides in the closed-loop supply chain, including the manufacturer itself, sometimes diminish as the manufacturer’s competitive preference behavior becomes more intense.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Xu & Kaiye Gao & Yuanying Chi & Yahui Chen & Rui Peng, 2022. "Interactive Impacts of Overconfidence and Competitive Preference on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:22:p:4334-:d:977198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4334/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4334/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roland Geyer & Luk N. Van Wassenhove & Atalay Atasu, 2007. "The Economics of Remanufacturing Under Limited Component Durability and Finite Product Life Cycles," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(1), pages 88-100, January.
    2. Kirshner, Samuel Nathan & Shao, Lusheng, 2019. "The overconfident and optimistic price-setting newsvendor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 166-173.
    3. Karray, Salma, 2013. "Periodicity of pricing and marketing efforts in a distribution channel," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 228(3), pages 635-647.
    4. Meng Li, 2019. "Overconfident Distribution Channels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(6), pages 1347-1365, June.
    5. Sotiris P. Gayialis & Evripidis P. Kechagias & Georgios A. Papadopoulos & Nikolaos A. Panayiotou, 2022. "A Business Process Reference Model for the Development of a Wine Traceability System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    6. Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Li, Jianbin, 2010. "Channel coordination under fairness concerns and nonlinear demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1321-1326, December.
    7. Donato Masi & Steven Day & Janet Godsell, 2017. "Supply Chain Configurations in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Yufei Ren & David Croson & Rachel Croson, 2017. "The overconfident newsvendor," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(5), pages 496-506, May.
    9. Bin Liu & Gangshu (George) Cai & Andy A. Tsay, 2014. "Advertising in Asymmetric Competing Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(11), pages 1845-1858, November.
    10. Nie, Tengfei & Du, Shaofu, 2017. "Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 491-500.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Chen & Ting Dong & Jin Peng & Dan Ralescu, 2023. "Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-45, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Xianjin & Zhan, Huimin & Zhu, Xiaoxuan & He, Xiuli, 2021. "The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Liu, Jie & Yang, Yang & Yu, Yugang, 2021. "Ordering and interest rate strategies in platform finance with an overconfident and commerce retailer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Hao, Zhongyuan & Li, Juan & Cai, Jinling, 2023. "Allocation of inventory responsibilities in overconfident supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 207-221.
    4. Linghong Zhang & Bowen Xue & Xiyu Liu, 2018. "Carbon Emission Reduction with Regard to Retailer’s Fairness Concern and Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar & Zaccour, Georges, 2017. "Assessing the profitability of cooperative advertising programs in competing channels," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 142-158.
    6. Shuchen Ni & Chun Feng & Handan Gou, 2023. "Nash-Bargaining Fairness Concerns under Push and Pull Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Zongsheng Huang, 2020. "Stochastic Differential Game in the Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Fairness Concern Retailer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Liu, Zhongyi & Li, Mengyu & Lei, Ying & Zhai, Xin, 2022. "A joint strategy based on ordering and insurance for mitigating the effects of supply chain disruption on risk-averse firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    9. Shoufeng Ji & Dan Zhao & Xiaoshuai Peng, 2018. "Joint Decisions on Emission Reduction and Inventory Replenishment with Overconfidence and Low-Carbon Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Zhisong Chen & Chaonan Tang & Jianhui Peng, 2023. "Nominal effect vs actual effect: overconfidence in a consignment omnichannel," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 843-876, June.
    11. Bo Yan & Jiwen Wu & Zijie Jin & Shiyou He, 2020. "Decision-making of fresh agricultural product supply chain considering the manufacturer’s fairness concerns," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 91-122, March.
    12. De Giovanni, Pietro & Karray, Salma & Martín-Herrán, Guiomar, 2019. "Vendor Management Inventory with consignment contracts and the benefits of cooperative advertising," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 465-480.
    13. Du, Shaofu & Chen, Yuan & Peng, Jing & Nie, Tengfei, 2022. "Incorporating risk fairness concerns into wine futures under quality uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. Nayeli Hernandez-Martinez & Nevin Mutlu & Jan C. Fransoo, 2021. "Social equity in supplier–buyer relationships in smallholder agri-food supply chains," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1027-1089, December.
    15. Kwon, Yong Woo & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Yoo, Seung Ho, 2022. "Quadratic quantity discount contract under price-dependent demand and consumer returns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Đula, Ivan & Größler, Andreas, 2021. "Inequity aversion in dynamically complex supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 309-322.
    17. Wei Guangxing & Yao Yanling & Qin Yanhong, 2019. "Optimal Decision-Making of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Incorporating Fairness Concerns," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 7(3), pages 283-294, June.
    18. Li, Zhong-Ping & Wang, Jian-Jun & Perera, Sandun & Shi, Jim (Junmin), 2022. "Coordination of a supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    19. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    20. Yadong Shu & Ying Dai & Zujun Ma, 2019. "Pricing Decisions in Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Peer-Induced Fairness Concerns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:22:p:4334-:d:977198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.