IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i19p3422-d920065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Increased Transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Driven by within or Outside-Host Processes?

Author

Listed:
  • Yehuda Arav

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Israel Institute for Biological Research, P.O. Box 19, Ness-Ziona 7410001, Israel)

  • Eyal Fattal

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Israel Institute for Biological Research, P.O. Box 19, Ness-Ziona 7410001, Israel)

  • Ziv Klausner

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, Israel Institute for Biological Research, P.O. Box 19, Ness-Ziona 7410001, Israel)

Abstract

Understanding the factors that increase the transmissibility of the recently emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2 can aid in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. Enhanced transmissibility could result from genetic variations that improve how the virus operates within the host or its environmental survival. Variants with enhanced within-host behavior are either more contagious (leading infected individuals to shed more virus copies) or more infective (requiring fewer virus copies to infect). Variants with improved outside-host processes exhibit higher stability on surfaces and in the air. While previous studies focus on a specific attribute, we investigated the contribution of both within-host and outside-host processes to the overall transmission between two individuals. We used a hybrid deterministic-continuous and stochastic-jump mathematical model. The model accounts for two distinct dynamic regimes: fast-discrete actions of the individuals and slow-continuous environmental virus degradation processes. This model produces a detailed description of the transmission mechanisms, in contrast to most-viral transmission models that deal with large populations and are thus compelled to provide an overly simplified description of person-to-person transmission. We based our analysis on the available data of the Alpha, Epsilon, Delta, and Omicron variants on the household secondary attack rate (hSAR). The increased hSAR associated with the recent SARS-CoV-2 variants can only be attributed to within-host processes. Specifically, the Delta variant is more contagious, while the Alpha, Epsilon, and Omicron variants are more infective. The model also predicts that genetic variations have a minimal effect on the serial interval distribution, the distribution of the period between the symptoms’ onset in an infector–infectee pair.

Suggested Citation

  • Yehuda Arav & Eyal Fattal & Ziv Klausner, 2022. "Is the Increased Transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Driven by within or Outside-Host Processes?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3422-:d:920065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/19/3422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wee Chian Koh & Lin Naing & Liling Chaw & Muhammad Ali Rosledzana & Mohammad Fathi Alikhan & Sirajul Adli Jamaludin & Faezah Amin & Asiah Omar & Alia Shazli & Matthew Griffith & Roberta Pastore & Just, 2020. "What do we know about SARS-CoV-2 transmission? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the secondary attack rate and associated risk factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Bruno Casella & Gareth O. Roberts, 2011. "Exact Simulation of Jump-Diffusion Processes with Monte Carlo Applications," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 449-473, September.
    3. Din, Anwarud & Li, Yongjin & Khan, Tahir & Zaman, Gul, 2020. "Mathematical analysis of spread and control of the novel corona virus (COVID-19) in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Casella, Bruno & Roberts, Gareth O., 2011. "Exact Simulation of Jump-Diffusion Processes with Monte Carlo Applications," MPRA Paper 95217, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Yingqin Zheng, 2020. "Digital Economies at Global Margins," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(2), pages 190-192, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giesecke, K. & Schwenkler, G., 2019. "Simulated likelihood estimators for discretely observed jump–diffusions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 297-320.
    2. K. Giesecke & H. Kakavand & M. Mousavi, 2011. "Exact Simulation of Point Processes with Stochastic Intensities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1233-1245, October.
    3. Flávio B. Gonçalves & Gareth O. Roberts, 2014. "Exact Simulation Problems for Jump-Diffusions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 907-930, December.
    4. Hermann, Simone & Ickstadt, Katja & Müller, Christine H., 2018. "Bayesian prediction for a jump diffusion process – With application to crack growth in fatigue experiments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 83-96.
    5. Wanmo Kang & Jong Mun Lee, 2019. "Unbiased Sensitivity Estimation of One-Dimensional Diffusion Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 334-353, February.
    6. Herrmann, Samuel & Massin, Nicolas, 2023. "Exact simulation of the first passage time through a given level of jump diffusions," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 553-576.
    7. Kay Giesecke & Dmitry Smelov, 2013. "Exact Sampling of Jump Diffusions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 894-907, August.
    8. Rudiger Frey & Verena Kock, 2021. "Deep Neural Network Algorithms for Parabolic PIDEs and Applications in Insurance Mathematics," Papers 2109.11403, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    9. Murray Pollock, 2015. "On the Exact Simulation of (Jump) Diffusion Bridges," Papers 1505.03030, arXiv.org.
    10. Ihtisham Ul Haq & Numan Ullah & Nigar Ali & Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, 2022. "A New Mathematical Model of COVID-19 with Quarantine and Vaccination," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Denis Mongin & Nils Bürgisser & Gustavo Laurie & Guillaume Schimmel & Diem-Lan Vu & Stephane Cullati & Delphine Sophie Courvoisier, 2023. "Effect of SARS-CoV-2 prior infection and mRNA vaccination on contagiousness and susceptibility to infection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Rahman, Mati ur & Ahmad, Saeed & Matoog, R.T. & Alshehri, Nawal A. & Khan, Tahir, 2021. "Study on the mathematical modelling of COVID-19 with Caputo-Fabrizio operator," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Spooner, Fiona & Abrams, Jesse F. & Morrissey, Karyn & Shaddick, Gavin & Batty, Michael & Milton, Richard & Dennett, Adam & Lomax, Nik & Malleson, Nick & Nelissen, Natalie & Coleman, Alex & Nur, Jamil, 2021. "A dynamic microsimulation model for epidemics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    14. Zhang, Ge & Li, Zhiming & Din, Anwarud, 2022. "A stochastic SIQR epidemic model with Lévy jumps and three-time delays," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    15. Din, Anwarud & Li, Yongjin & Yusuf, Abdullahi, 2021. "Delayed hepatitis B epidemic model with stochastic analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Yassine Sabbar & Asad Khan & Anwarud Din, 2022. "Probabilistic Analysis of a Marine Ecological System with Intense Variability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Wen Dong & Peng Zhang & Quan-Li Xu & Zhong-Da Ren & Jie Wang, 2022. "A Study on a Neural Network Risk Simulation Model Construction for Avian Influenza A (H7N9) Outbreaks in Humans in China during 2013–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Xi Guo & Abhineet Gupta & Anand Sampat & Chengwei Zhai, 2022. "A stochastic contact network model for assessing outbreak risk of COVID-19 in workplaces," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Xuan Leng & Asad Khan & Anwarud Din, 2023. "Probability Analysis of a Stochastic Non-Autonomous SIQRC Model with Inference," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:19:p:3422-:d:920065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.