IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i17p3164-d905376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preliminary Results on the Preinduction Cervix Status by Shear Wave Elastography

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Torres

    (Ultrasonics Lab (TEP-959), Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    TEC12-Salud Materno Fetal y Elastografía, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain)

  • María Muñoz

    (Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • María Del Carmen Porcel

    (Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • Sofía Contreras

    (Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • Francisca Sonia Molina

    (TEC12-Salud Materno Fetal y Elastografía, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain
    Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • Guillermo Rus

    (Ultrasonics Lab (TEP-959), Department of Structural Mechanics, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    TEC12-Salud Materno Fetal y Elastografía, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain
    Excellence Research Unit “ModelingNature” (MNat), Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Olga Ocón-Hernández

    (TEC12-Salud Materno Fetal y Elastografía, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain
    Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, 18016 Granada, Spain)

  • Juan Melchor

    (TEC12-Salud Materno Fetal y Elastografía, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), 18012 Granada, Spain
    Excellence Research Unit “ModelingNature” (MNat), Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain
    Biostatistics (FQM-235), Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

The mechanical status of the cervix is a key physiological element during pregnancy. By considering a successful induction when the active phase of labor is achieved, mapping the mechanical properties of the cervix could have predictive potential for the management of induction protocols. In this sense, we performed a preliminary assessment of the diagnostic value of using shear wave elastography before labor induction in 54 women, considering the pregnancy outcome and Cesarean indications. Three anatomical cervix regions and standard methods, such as cervical length and Bishop score, were compared. To study the discriminatory power of each diagnostic method, a receiver operating characteristic curve was generated. Differences were observed using the external os region and cervical length in the failure to enter the active phase group compared to the vaginal delivery group ( p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve resulted in 68.9%, 65.2% and 67.2% for external os, internal os and cervix box using elastography, respectively, compared to 69.5% for cervical length and 62.2% for Bishop score. External os elastography values have shown promise in predicting induction success. This a priori information could be used to prepare a study with a larger sample size, which would reduce the effect of any bias selection and increase the predictive power of elastography compared to other classical techniques.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Torres & María Muñoz & María Del Carmen Porcel & Sofía Contreras & Francisca Sonia Molina & Guillermo Rus & Olga Ocón-Hernández & Juan Melchor, 2022. "Preliminary Results on the Preinduction Cervix Status by Shear Wave Elastography," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3164-:d:905376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3164/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/17/3164/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuhn, Max, 2008. "Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabal Das & D. A. Sachindra & Kironmala Chanda, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6043-6071, December.
    2. Jie Zhao & Ji Chen & Damien Beillouin & Hans Lambers & Yadong Yang & Pete Smith & Zhaohai Zeng & Jørgen E. Olesen & Huadong Zang, 2022. "Global systematic review with meta-analysis reveals yield advantage of legume-based rotations and its drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Piaopiao Chen & Agnès H. Michel & Jianzhi Zhang, 2022. "Transposon insertional mutagenesis of diverse yeast strains suggests coordinated gene essentiality polymorphisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Paulo Infante & Gonçalo Jacinto & Anabela Afonso & Leonor Rego & Pedro Nogueira & Marcelo Silva & Vitor Nogueira & José Saias & Paulo Quaresma & Daniel Santos & Patrícia Góis & Paulo Rebelo Manuel, 2023. "Factors That Influence the Type of Road Traffic Accidents: A Case Study in a District of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Ephrem Habyarimana & Faheem S Baloch, 2021. "Machine learning models based on remote and proximal sensing as potential methods for in-season biomass yields prediction in commercial sorghum fields," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    7. Alexander Wettstein & Gabriel Jenni & Ida Schneider & Fabienne Kühne & Martin grosse Holtforth & Roberto La Marca, 2023. "Predictors of Psychological Strain and Allostatic Load in Teachers: Examining the Long-Term Effects of Biopsychosocial Risk and Protective Factors Using a LASSO Regression Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Tang, Kayu & Parsons, David J. & Jude, Simon, 2019. "Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 24-36.
    9. Daifeng Xiang & Gangsheng Wang & Jing Tian & Wanyu Li, 2023. "Global patterns and edaphic-climatic controls of soil carbon decomposition kinetics predicted from incubation experiments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Bellotti, Anthony & Brigo, Damiano & Gambetti, Paolo & Vrins, Frédéric, 2021. "Forecasting recovery rates on non-performing loans with machine learning," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 428-444.
    11. Tranos, Emmanouil & Incera, Andre Carrascal & Willis, George, 2022. "Using the web to predict regional trade flows: data extraction, modelling, and validation," OSF Preprints 9bu5z, Center for Open Science.
    12. Štefan Lyócsa & Petra Vašaničová & Branka Hadji Misheva & Marko Dávid Vateha, 2022. "Default or profit scoring credit systems? Evidence from European and US peer-to-peer lending markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Arjan S. Gosal & Janine A. McMahon & Katharine M. Bowgen & Catherine H. Hoppe & Guy Ziv, 2021. "Identifying and Mapping Groups of Protected Area Visitors by Environmental Awareness," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    14. Marcos Rodrigues & Fermín Alcasena & Pere Gelabert & Cristina Vega‐García, 2020. "Geospatial Modeling of Containment Probability for Escaped Wildfires in a Mediterranean Region," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(9), pages 1762-1779, September.
    15. Giovanny Pillajo-Quijia & Blanca Arenas-Ramírez & Camino González-Fernández & Francisco Aparicio-Izquierdo, 2020. "Influential Factors on Injury Severity for Drivers of Light Trucks and Vans with Machine Learning Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, February.
    16. Francesco Sartor & Jonathan P. Moore & Hans-Peter Kubis, 2021. "Plasma Interleukin-10 and Cholesterol Levels May Inform about Interdependences between Fitness and Fatness in Healthy Individuals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Zander S. Venter & Adam Sadilek & Charlotte Stanton & David N. Barton & Kristin Aunan & Sourangsu Chowdhury & Aaron Schneider & Stefano Maria Iacus, 2021. "Mobility in Blue-Green Spaces Does Not Predict COVID-19 Transmission: A Global Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-12, November.
    18. G. Brooke Anderson & Keith W. Oleson & Bryan Jones & Roger D. Peng, 2018. "Classifying heatwaves: developing health-based models to predict high-mortality versus moderate United States heatwaves," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 439-453, February.
    19. Van Belle, Jente & Guns, Tias & Verbeke, Wouter, 2021. "Using shared sell-through data to forecast wholesaler demand in multi-echelon supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 466-479.
    20. Michael J. Geuenich & Dae-won Gong & Kieran R. Campbell, 2024. "The impacts of active and self-supervised learning on efficient annotation of single-cell expression data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:17:p:3164-:d:905376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.