IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v10y2022i12p1994-d834842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explainable Machine Learning for Longitudinal Multi-Omic Microbiome

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Laccourreye

    (Digital Health & Biomedical Technologies, Vicomtech Foundation, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain)

  • Concha Bielza

    (Artificial Intelligence Department, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28660 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pedro Larrañaga

    (Artificial Intelligence Department, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28660 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Over the years, research studies have shown there is a key connection between the microbial community in the gut, genes, and immune system. Understanding this association may help discover the cause of complex chronic idiopathic disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease. Even though important efforts have been put into the field, the functions, dynamics, and causation of dysbiosis state performed by the microbial community remains unclear. Machine learning models can help elucidate important connections and relationships between microbes in the human host. Our study aims to extend the current knowledge of associations between the human microbiome and health and disease through the application of dynamic Bayesian networks to describe the temporal variation of the gut microbiota and dynamic relationships between taxonomic entities and clinical variables. We develop a set of preprocessing steps to clean, filter, select, integrate, and model informative metagenomics, metatranscriptomics, and metabolomics longitudinal data from the Human Microbiome Project. This study accomplishes novel network models with satisfactory predictive performance (accuracy = 0.648) for each inflammatory bowel disease state, validating Bayesian networks as a framework for developing interpretable models to help understand the basic ways the different biological entities (taxa, genes, metabolites) interact with each other in a given environment (human gut) over time. These findings can serve as a starting point to advance the discovery of novel therapeutic approaches and new biomarkers for precision medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Laccourreye & Concha Bielza & Pedro Larrañaga, 2022. "Explainable Machine Learning for Longitudinal Multi-Omic Microbiome," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:1994-:d:834842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/12/1994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/12/1994/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J McGeachie & Hsun-Hsien Chang & Scott T Weiss, 2014. "CGBayesNets: Conditional Gaussian Bayesian Network Learning and Inference with Mixed Discrete and Continuous Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-7, June.
    2. Ahmed A Metwally & Philip S Yu & Derek Reiman & Yang Dai & Patricia W Finn & David L Perkins, 2019. "Utilizing longitudinal microbiome taxonomic profiles to predict food allergy via Long Short-Term Memory networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Scutari, Marco, 2010. "Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 35(i03).
    4. Chris J Needham & James R Bradford & Andrew J Bulpitt & David R Westhead, 2007. "A Primer on Learning in Bayesian Networks for Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-8, August.
    5. Richard Howey & So-Youn Shin & Caroline Relton & George Davey Smith & Heather J Cordell, 2020. "Bayesian network analysis incorporating genetic anchors complements conventional Mendelian randomization approaches for exploratory analysis of causal relationships in complex data," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-35, March.
    6. Davide Castelvecchi, 2016. "Can we open the black box of AI?," Nature, Nature, vol. 538(7623), pages 20-23, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prabal Das & D. A. Sachindra & Kironmala Chanda, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Rainfall Forecasting with Multiple Non-Linear Feature Selection Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(15), pages 6043-6071, December.
    2. Vuong, Quan-Hoang & La, Viet-Phuong, 2019. "The bayesvl R package. User guide v0.8.1," OSF Preprints w5dx6, Center for Open Science.
    3. F. Cugnata & G. Perucca & S. Salini, 2017. "Bayesian networks and the assessment of universities' value added," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(10), pages 1785-1806, July.
    4. Roland R. Ramsahai, 2020. "Connecting actuarial judgment to probabilistic learning techniques with graph theory," Papers 2007.15475, arXiv.org.
    5. Tang, Kayu & Parsons, David J. & Jude, Simon, 2019. "Comparison of automatic and guided learning for Bayesian networks to analyse pipe failures in the water distribution system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 24-36.
    6. Liza Darrous & Ninon Mounier & Zoltán Kutalik, 2021. "Simultaneous estimation of bi-directional causal effects and heritable confounding from GWAS summary statistics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Myriam Patricia Cifuentes & Clara Mercedes Suarez & Ricardo Cifuentes & Noel Malod-Dognin & Sam Windels & Jose Fernando Valderrama & Paul D. Juarez & R. Burciaga Valdez & Cynthia Colen & Charles Phill, 2022. "Big Data to Knowledge Analytics Reveals the Zika Virus Epidemic as Only One of Multiple Factors Contributing to a Year-Over-Year 28-Fold Increase in Microcephaly Incidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Alireza Rezazadeh & Yasamin Jafarian & Ali Kord, 2022. "Explainable Ensemble Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Ultrasound Image Texture Features," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Silvia de Juan & Maria Dulce Subida & Andres Ospina-Alvarez & Ainara Aguilar & Miriam Fernandez, 2020. "Disentangling the socio-ecological drivers behind illegal fishing in a small-scale fishery managed by a TURF system," Papers 2012.08970, arXiv.org.
    10. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    11. Michail Tsagris, 2021. "A New Scalable Bayesian Network Learning Algorithm with Applications to Economics," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 341-367, January.
    12. Hsu, Chia-Wei & Xiong, Rui & Chen, Nan-Yow & Li, Ju & Tsou, Nien-Ti, 2022. "Deep neural network battery life and voltage prediction by using data of one cycle only," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    13. Michael J. Brusco & Douglas Steinley & Ashley L. Watts, 2022. "Disentangling relationships in symptom networks using matrix permutation methods," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 133-155, March.
    14. Zhang, Qiongfang & Xu, Nan & Ersoy, Daniel & Liu, Yongming, 2022. "Manifold-based Conditional Bayesian network for aging pipe yield strength estimation with non-destructive measurements," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Sangsung Park & Sunghae Jun, 2020. "Patent Keyword Analysis of Disaster Artificial Intelligence Using Bayesian Network Modeling and Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-11, January.
    16. Laith T. Khrais, 2020. "Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping Consumer Demand in E-Commerce," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Federica Cugnata & Silvia Salini & Elena Siletti, 2021. "Deepening Well-Being Evaluation with Different Data Sources: A Bayesian Networks Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-10, July.
    18. Bibartiu, Otto & Dürr, Frank & Rothermel, Kurt & Ottenwälder, Beate & Grau, Andreas, 2021. "Scalable k-out-of-n models for dependability analysis with Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    19. Lingfei Wang, 2021. "Single-cell normalization and association testing unifying CRISPR screen and gene co-expression analyses with Normalisr," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Bruce G. Marcot & Anca M. Hanea, 2021. "What is an optimal value of k in k-fold cross-validation in discrete Bayesian network analysis?," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 2009-2031, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:1994-:d:834842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.