IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v9y2025i2p52-d1634448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agent-Based Control of Interaction Areas in Intralogistics: Concept, Implementation and Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Felix Gehlhoff

    (Institute of Automation Technology, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Niklas Jobs

    (Institute of Automation Technology, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

  • Vincent Henkel

    (Institute of Automation Technology, Helmut Schmidt University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, 22043 Hamburg, Germany)

Abstract

Background : Intralogistics systems face growing challenges from globalization, individualization, and shorter product life cycles, demanding flexible and responsive solutions beyond traditional centralized control. Decentralized, agent-based approaches offer potential advantages, especially for Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) systems where managing collisions in interaction areas remains a critical issue. Methods : This study proposes two decentralized, agent-based control concepts for AGV systems in intralogistics. One uses a hierarchical model with an Intersection Manager to coordinate AGV agents, while the other employs a fully heterarchical system. For benchmarking, a First Come, First Served heuristic and a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) method are also implemented. Simulations show both agent-based approaches effectively prevent collisions and uphold order prioritization and timing goals. While average delays are similar, the heterarchical system requires up to 2.7 times more communication. Priority-based control enhances timeliness for highpriority vehicles but can increase delays for lower-priority AGVs. The MILP method, though effective, is limited by impractical computation times. Results : The study confirms the viability of agent-based control for managing interaction areas in AGV systems, highlighting trade-offs between decentralization, efficiency, and communication. Conclusions : It offers a foundation for further research into hybrid models and real-world application of decentralized control strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix Gehlhoff & Niklas Jobs & Vincent Henkel, 2025. "Agent-Based Control of Interaction Areas in Intralogistics: Concept, Implementation and Simulation," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-33, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:52-:d:1634448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/2/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/9/2/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le-Anh, Tuan & De Koster, M.B.M., 2006. "A review of design and control of automated guided vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(1), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Vis, Iris F.A., 2006. "Survey of research in the design and control of automated guided vehicle systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 677-709, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalila B. M. M. Fontes & Seyed Mahdi Homayouni, 2019. "Joint production and transportation scheduling in flexible manufacturing systems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 879-908, August.
    2. Asef-Vaziri, Ardavan & Kazemi, Morteza & Eshghi, Kourosh & Lahmar, Maher, 2010. "An ant colony system for enhanced loop-based aisle-network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 110-120, November.
    3. Amir Ahmadi-Javid & Nasrin Ramshe, 2019. "Designing flexible loop-based material handling AGV paths with cell-adjacency priorities: an efficient cutting-plane algorithm," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 373-400, December.
    4. Amogh Bhosekar & Sandra Ekşioğlu & Tuğçe Işık & Robert Allen, 2023. "A discrete event simulation model for coordinating inventory management and material handling in hospitals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 603-630, January.
    5. Fragapane, Giuseppe & de Koster, René & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Strandhagen, Jan Ola, 2021. "Planning and control of autonomous mobile robots for intralogistics: Literature review and research agenda," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 405-426.
    6. Yan, Rundong & Dunnett, S.J. & Jackson, L.M., 2018. "Novel methodology for optimising the design, operation and maintenance of a multi-AGV system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 130-139.
    7. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Inter-terminal transportation: an annotated bibliography and research agenda," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 35-63, March.
    8. Aziez, Imadeddine & Côté, Jean-François & Coelho, Leandro C., 2022. "Fleet sizing and routing of healthcare automated guided vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. AERTS, Babiche & CORNELISSENS, Trijntje & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2018. "The influence of e-commerce on the design of warehouses - a literature review," Working Papers 2018013, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    10. Ferrara, Andrea & Gebennini, Elisa & Grassi, Andrea, 2014. "Fleet sizing of laser guided vehicles and pallet shuttles in automated warehouses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 7-14.
    11. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    12. Roy, Debjit & Nigam, Shobhit & de Koster, René & Adan, Ivo & Resing, Jacques, 2019. "Robot-storage zone assignment strategies in mobile fulfillment systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 119-142.
    13. Chen, Wanying & Gong, Yeming & Chen, Qi & Wang, Hongwei, 2024. "Does battery management matter? Performance evaluation and operating policies in a self-climbing robotic warehouse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(1), pages 164-181.
    14. Singh, Nitish & Dang, Quang-Vinh & Akcay, Alp & Adan, Ivo & Martagan, Tugce, 2022. "A matheuristic for AGV scheduling with battery constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 855-873.
    15. Emde, Simon & Tahirov, Nail & Gendreau, Michel & Glock, Christoph H., 2021. "Routing automated lane-guided transport vehicles in a warehouse handling returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 1085-1098.
    16. John Lees-Miller, 2016. "Minimising average passenger waiting time in personal rapid transit systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 405-424, January.
    17. Zhuang, Yanling & Zhou, Yun & Hassini, Elkafi & Yuan, Yufei & Hu, Xiangpei, 2022. "Rack retrieval and repositioning optimization problem in robotic mobile fulfillment systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    18. repec:zib:zbjtin:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:54-57 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Boysen, Nils & de Koster, René & Weidinger, Felix, 2019. "Warehousing in the e-commerce era: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 396-411.
    20. Jenny Nossack & Dirk Briskorn & Erwin Pesch, 2018. "Container Dispatching and Conflict-Free Yard Crane Routing in an Automated Container Terminal," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1059-1076, October.
    21. Jonas F. Leon & Mohammad Peyman & Xabier A. Martin & Angel A. Juan, 2024. "Simulation of Heuristics for Automated Guided Vehicle Task Sequencing with Resource Sharing and Dynamic Queues," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:9:y:2025:i:2:p:52-:d:1634448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.