IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v11y2022i6p80-d954208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public–Private Interactions in Privacy Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Shin-yi Peng

    (Institute of Law for Science and Technology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu City 300044, Taiwan)

Abstract

This paper addresses the possible roles of private actors when privacy paradigms are in flux. If the traditional “informed consent”-based government-dominated approaches are ill-suited to the big data ecosystem, can private governance fill the gap created by state regulation? In reality, how is public–private partnership being implemented in the privacy protection frameworks? This paper uses cases from APEC’s Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) and the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as models for exploration. The analysis in this paper demonstrates the fluidity of interactions across public and private governance realms. Self-regulation and state regulation are opposing ends of a regulatory continuum, with CBPR-type “collaboration” and GDPR-type “coordination” falling somewhere in the middle. The author concludes that there is an evident gap between private actors’ potential governing functions and their current roles in privacy protection regimes. Looking to the future, technological developments and market changes call for further public–private convergence in privacy governance, allowing the public authority and the private sector to simultaneously reshape global privacy norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin-yi Peng, 2022. "Public–Private Interactions in Privacy Governance," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:80-:d:954208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/6/80/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/11/6/80/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Cashore & Jette Steen Knudsen & Jeremy Moon & Hamish van der Ven, 2021. "Private authority and public policy interactions in global context: Governance spheres for problem solving," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1166-1182, October.
    2. Andrew D Mitchell & Neha Mishra, 2019. "Regulating Cross-Border Data Flows in a Data-Driven World: How WTO Law Can Contribute," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 389-416.
    3. Kamara, Irene, 2020. "Misaligned Union laws? A comparative analysis of certification in the Cybersecurity Act and the General Data Protection Regulation," LawArXiv 82un9, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alicia Blanco-González & Francisco Díez-Martín & Giorgia Miotto, 2023. "Achieving Legitimacy Through Gender Equality Policies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    2. Halalisan, Florin & Romero, Claudia & Popa, Bogdan & Arana Landin, German & Talpa, Nicolae & ABRUDAN, Ioan Vasile, 2023. "Global assessment of FSC forest management certification auditing through analysis of accreditation reports," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Frederic Boissay & Torsten Ehlers & Leonardo Gambacorta & Hyun Song Shin, 2021. "Big Techs in Finance: On the New Nexus Between Data Privacy and Competition," Springer Books, in: Raghavendra Rau & Robert Wardrop & Luigi Zingales (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Technological Finance, pages 855-875, Springer.
    4. Gastón de los Reyes & Markus Scholz, 2023. "Assessing the Legitimacy of Corporate Political Activity: Uber and the Quest for Responsible Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 51-69, April.
    5. Xiying Zhang & Yihuan Wang, 2022. "Research on the Influence of Digital Technology and Policy Restrictions on the Development of Digital Service Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Hamish van der Ven & David Barmes, 2023. "The uneasy marriage of private standards and public policies for sustainable commodity governance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5161-5173, December.
    7. Fiona Kinniburgh & Henrik Selin & Noelle E. Selin & Miranda Schreurs, 2023. "When private governance impedes multilateralism: The case of international pesticide governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 425-448, April.
    8. Andonova, Liliana B. & Piselli, Dario, 2022. "Transnational partnerships, domestic institutions, and sustainable development. The case of Brazil and the Amazon Region Protected Areas program," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:11:y:2022:i:6:p:80-:d:954208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.