IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v9y2020i5p149-d358065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Planning for an Agricultural Research Center: A Research-by-Design Case Study in Chiang Mai, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Nadchawan Charoenlertthanakit

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Chulalux Wanitchayapaisit

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Ekachai Yaipimol

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Vipavee Surinseng

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Pongsakorn Suppakittpaisarn

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

Abstract

Effective planning at the landscape scale is a difficult but crucial task. Modern landscape planning requires economic success, ecological resilience, and environmental justice. Thus, planners and designers must learn to use a deliberative approach in planning: an approach in which decisions are made with the common understanding of stakeholders. This notwithstanding, there is a lack of localized and site-specific design examples for deliberative planning. One of the lacking examples is agricultural research station, which is unique because it balances economic, academic, and public uses. This study used a Research-by-Design Method to explore deliberative planning for an agricultural research station in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Field surveys, interviews, and archival search were conducted for database. Design decisions were delivered via linear-combination suitability analysis. We found that the site was viewed differently by different sets of users. The basic and safety infrastructure was the top priority, and clear direction of governance was crucial to move the site forward in the future. This study was one of the first recorded attempts to design an agricultural research center via the Research-by-Design process. The method and results of the research contribute to the growing body of evidence to support the need of evidence-based design and planning for all sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadchawan Charoenlertthanakit & Chulalux Wanitchayapaisit & Ekachai Yaipimol & Vipavee Surinseng & Pongsakorn Suppakittpaisarn, 2020. "Landscape Planning for an Agricultural Research Center: A Research-by-Design Case Study in Chiang Mai, Thailand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:149-:d:358065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/5/149/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/5/149/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yexuan Gu & Brian Deal & Linda Larsen, 2018. "Geodesign Processes and Ecological Systems Thinking in a Coupled Human-Environment Context: An Integrated Framework for Landscape Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Damian Parr & Cary Trexler & Navina Khanna & Bryce Battisti, 2007. "Designing sustainable agriculture education: Academics’ suggestions for an undergraduate curriculum at a land grant university," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(4), pages 523-533, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ifigenia Psarra & Özlem Altınkaya Genel & Alex van Spyk, 2021. "A Research by Design Strategy for Climate Adaptation Solutions: Implementation in the Low-Density, High Flood Risk Context of the Lake District, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoonshin Kwak & Brian Deal & Grant Mosey, 2021. "Landscape Design toward Urban Resilience: Bridging Science and Physical Design Coupling Sociohydrological Modeling and Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Ryan Galt & Damian Parr & Julia Van Soelen Kim & Jessica Beckett & Maggie Lickter & Heidi Ballard, 2013. "Transformative food systems education in a land-grant college of agriculture: the importance of learner-centered inquiries," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 129-142, March.
    3. Michele Campagna & Elisabetta Anna Di Cesare & Chiara Cocco, 2020. "Integrating Green-Infrastructures Design in Strategic Spatial Planning with Geodesign," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Sanjeev Kumar Srivastava & Gary Scott & Johanna Rosier, 2022. "Use of geodesign tools for visualisation of scenarios for an ecologically sensitive area at a local scale," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(1), pages 23-40, January.
    5. Xin Cheng & Sylvie Van Damme & Pieter Uyttenhove, 2021. "Applying the Evaluation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Landscape Architecture Design: Challenges and Opportunities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Marianna Cavada & Chris Bouch & Chris Rogers & Michael Grace & Alexander Robertson, 2021. "A Soft Systems Methodology for Business Creation: The Lost World at Tyseley, Birmingham," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 32-48.
    7. Ralph De Witte & Dirk Janssen & Samir Sayadi Gmada & Carmen García-García, 2023. "Best Practices for Training in Sustainable Greenhouse Horticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Kaneene, John B. & Kirsten, Johann F. & Mugisha, Anthony & Kabasa, John David, 2014. "Models for University Engagement with Private and Public Sector Employers," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 183864, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Christopher D. Murakami & Mary K. Hendrickson & Marcelle A. Siegel, 2017. "Sociocultural tensions and wicked problems in sustainable agriculture education," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 591-606, September.
    10. Sonali Sharma & Pawan Kumar Joshi & Christine Fürst, 2022. "Exploring Multiscale Influence of Urban Growth on Landscape Patterns of Two Emerging Urban Centers in the Western Himalaya," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Kernecker, Maria & Seufert, Verena & Chapman, Mollie, 2021. "Farmer-centered ecological intensification: Using innovation characteristics to identify barriers and opportunities for a transition of agroecosystems towards sustainability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:9:y:2020:i:5:p:149-:d:358065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.