IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1654-d1725457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Temporal and Spatial Changes and Equity of Green Spaces in Guangzhou Central City Since the 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Yutong Chen

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Qin Li

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Weida Yin

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Green space (GS) equity is a crucial component of environmental justice. From the perspective of environmental justice, this study focuses on the equity of GS across sub-districts with varying GDP levels in Guangzhou, quantitatively assessing and comparing GS equity in areas with different development statuses. However, existing research still lacks sufficient exploration of the relationship between micro-scale socioeconomic indicators and GS equity. To address this gap, this study investigates the inequality of GS availability across neighborhoods during the rapid urbanization process in Guangzhou’s central urban area from 2000 to 2020. Key indicators for measuring GS availability—including GS area, per capita GS area, and NDVI—were selected and calculated for each sub-district in 2000 and 2020. This approach reveals spatial disparities in GS distribution between the two years. Subsequently, the Theil index and Gini index were employed to assess the degree of inequality in GS. Using GS area data and NDVI data, this study analyzes per capita GS area and NDVI values across sub-districts with different development levels in Guangzhou’s central urban area. Statistical methods such as the Theil index were then applied to evaluate the equity of these indicators. The findings indicate that between 2000 and 2020, Guangzhou experienced significant urbanization, a notable decline in total GS area, a marked improvement in NDVI values, and a substantial improvement in GS equity. There is a conflict between the supply of green resources and the demand for high-density economic/population centers. This research provides scientific evidence for urban planners and policymakers to promote the equitable distribution and sustainable development of GS.

Suggested Citation

  • Yutong Chen & Qin Li & Weida Yin, 2025. "Assessment of the Temporal and Spatial Changes and Equity of Green Spaces in Guangzhou Central City Since the 21st Century," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1654-:d:1725457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1654/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1654/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank A. Cowell, 1980. "On the Structure of Additive Inequality Measures," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(3), pages 521-531.
    2. Zhiwen Duan & Longbao Huang & Zhicai Zhu & Shaoqiu Long & Yilun Liu, 2025. "Transformation and Inequity of Urban Green Space in Guangzhou: Drivers and Policy Implications Under Rapid Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Kaili Chen & Tianzheng Zhang & Fangyuan Liu & Yingjie Zhang & Yan Song, 2021. "How Does Urban Green Space Impact Residents’ Mental Health: A Literature Review of Mediators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-27, November.
    4. Sainan Du & Huagui He & Yanfang Liu & Lijun Xing, 2022. "Identifying Key Factors Associated with Green Justice in Accessibility: A Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Xiao, Xiao & Aultman-Hall, Lisa & Manning, Robert & Voigt, Brian, 2018. "The impact of spatial accessibility and perceived barriers on visitation to the US national park system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 205-214.
    6. Qin Li & Wei Duan & Yutong Chen & Mengxiang Ma & Xiaodong Zheng, 2025. "Assessment of Urban Green Space Equity in Beijing’s Central Urban Villages: A Remote Sensing Perspective on Environmental Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon & Jasmine Thompson & Athena Murray & Ariel Henderson & Richard Schulterbrandt Gragg, 2024. "The Dynamic Relationship between Social Cohesion and Urban Green Space in Diverse Communities: Opportunities and Challenges to Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Yiyong Chen & Weiying Gu & Tao Liu & Lei Yuan & Mali Zeng, 2017. "Increasing the Use of Urban Greenways in Developing Countries: A Case Study on Wutong Greenway in Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Yingxue Rao & Yi Zhong & Qingsong He & Jingyi Dai, 2022. "Assessing the Equity of Accessibility to Urban Green Space: A Study of 254 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siruo Qu & Ruochen Ma, 2024. "Exploring Multi-Sensory Approaches for Psychological Well-Being in Urban Green Spaces: Evidence from Edinburgh’s Diverse Urban Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Alvaredo, Facundo & Bourguignon, François & Ferreira, Francisco H. G. & Lustig, Nora, 2023. "Seventy-five Years of Measuring Income Inequality in Latin America," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13157, Inter-American Development Bank.
    3. Casilda Lasso de la Vega & Ana Urrutia & Oscar Volij, 2011. "An Axiomatic Characterization Of The Theil Inequality Order," Working Papers 1103, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    4. Lopez-Acevedo, Gladys & Salinas, Angel, 2000. "How Mexico's financial crisis affected income distribution," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2406, The World Bank.
    5. Tugce, Cuhadaroglu, 2013. "My Group Beats Your Group: Evaluating Non-Income Inequalities," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-49, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    6. Maria Cubel & Peter Lambert, 2002. "Progression-neutral income tax reforms and horizontal inequity," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 77(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Bart Capéau & André Decoster & Bram De Rock & Jonas Vanderkelen, 2024. "Did Belgium withstand the storm of rising inequalities? Income inequality in Belgium, 1985–2020," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 285-308, September.
    8. Teixidó Figueras, Jordi & Duro Moreno, Juan Antonio, 2012. "Ecological Footprint Inequality: A methodological review and some results," Working Papers 2072/203168, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    9. Xu, Chong & Wang, Bingjie & Chen, Jiandong & Shen, Zhiyang & Song, Malin & An, Jiafu, 2022. "Carbon inequality in China: Novel drivers and policy driven scenario analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Fabio Clementi & Mauro Gallegati & Giorgio Kaniadakis, 2010. "A model of personal income distribution with application to Italian data," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 559-591, October.
    11. Satya R. Chakravarty & Pietro Muliere, 2003. "Welfare indicators: A review and new perspectives. 1. Measurement of inequality," Metron - International Journal of Statistics, Dipartimento di Statistica, Probabilità e Statistiche Applicate - University of Rome, vol. 0(3), pages 457-497.
    12. Nurgül Arısoy, 2025. "The Effects of Experiential Quality on Restorative Experience and Subjective Well-Being: An Assessment of Urban Forest Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. repec:hal:journl:dumas-00906310 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Xiangqian Wang & Shudong Wang & Yongqiu Xia, 2022. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    15. Ana Suárez Álvarez & Ana Jesús López Menéndez, 2018. "Assessing Changes Over Time in Inequality of Opportunity: The Case of Spain," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 989-1014, October.
    16. Linden, Jules & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Sologon, Denisa M., 2024. "The many faces of carbon tax regressivity—Why carbon taxes are not always regressive for the same reason," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Nicole Palan, 2010. "Measurement of Specialization – The Choice of Indices," FIW Working Paper series 062, FIW.
    18. Kleiber, Christian, 2001. "Corrigendum to "The Existence of Population Inequality Measures": [Economics Letters 57 (1997) 39-44]," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 429-429, June.
    19. Yawo Agbényég Noglo, 2014. "Monetary Inequality Among Households in Togo: An Illustration Based on the Decomposition of the Gini Coefficient Using the Shapley Value Approach," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-151, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    20. Eva Camacho-Cuena & Tibor Neugebauer & Christian Seidl, 2007. "Leaky Buckets Versus Compensating Justice: An Experimental Investigation," Working Papers 74, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    21. Satya Chakravarty, 2001. "The Variance as a subgroup decomposable measure of inequality," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 79-95, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1654-:d:1725457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.