IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1483-d1703639.html

Peri-Urban Land Transformation in the Global South: Revisiting Conceptual Vectors and Theoretical Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Shiwaye M. Tesfay

    (Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
    Department of Urban Transport Management, Kotobe University of Education, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 31248, Ethiopia)

  • Genet Alem Gebregiorgis

    (Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Daniel G. Ayele

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Education, Kotobe University of Education, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 31248, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Peri-urban areas in the Global South are rapidly transforming due to urban expansion, land commodification, and institutional change. Although diverse theoretical perspectives address these dynamics, existing scholarship remains fragmented. This study systematically reviews how various theoretical frameworks deepen our understanding of peri-urban land transformation, focusing on conceptual and institutional dimensions. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic review was conducted on 120 studies published between 1996 and 2024, sourced from Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, and additional unindexed repositories. Eligible studies explicitly addressed peri-urban land issues in the Global South and applied theoretical approaches. Data extraction involved detailed coding of study characteristics, theoretical orientations, and thematic insights. Using open and selective coding, 19 thematic codes were identified. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) conceptualizing peri-urban spaces through territorial, functional, and transitional lenses; (2) institutionalization of place; and (3) theoretical interpretations of land transformation grounded in neoclassical, modernization, neo-Marxist, dependency, structuration, institutionalist, and urban political ecology frameworks. Studies were appraised for theoretical rigor, relevance, and potential conceptual bias. Limitations include the exclusion of non-English studies. Findings highlight the need for pluralistic, context-sensitive frameworks, with political ecology offering a particularly integrative analytical lens to examine global–local power dynamics and socio-natural transformations. This review was funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Georg Forster Fellowship, grant no. 1233452).

Suggested Citation

  • Shiwaye M. Tesfay & Genet Alem Gebregiorgis & Daniel G. Ayele, 2025. "Peri-Urban Land Transformation in the Global South: Revisiting Conceptual Vectors and Theoretical Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1483-:d:1703639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Harvey, 2007. "Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 610(1), pages 21-44, March.
    2. Michael Ekers & Scott Prudham, 2018. "The Socioecological Fix: Fixed Capital, Metabolism, and Hegemony," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(1), pages 17-34, January.
    3. Wendy Wolford & Saturnino M. Borras Jr. & Ruth Hall & Ian Scoones & Ben White & Michael Levien, 2013. "Regimes of Dispossession: From Steel Towns to Special Economic Zones," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 44(2), pages 381-407, March.
    4. Genet Alem, 2021. "Urban Plans and Conflicting Interests in Sustainable Cross-Boundary Land Governance, the Case of National Urban and Regional Plans in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Horman Chitonge, 2018. "Capitalism in Africa: mutating capitalist relations and social formations," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(155), pages 158-167, January.
    6. Jennifer Clapp & S. Ryan Isakson & Oane Visser, 2017. "The complex dynamics of agriculture as a financial asset: introduction to symposium," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 179-183, March.
    7. Carsten Butsch & Shreya Chakraborty & Sharlene L. Gomes & Shamita Kumar & Leon M. Hermans, 2021. "Changing Hydrosocial Cycles in Periurban India," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Helga Leitner & Samuel Nowak & Eric Sheppard, 2023. "Everyday speculation in the remaking of peri-urban livelihoods and landscapes," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(2), pages 388-406, March.
    9. Fulong Wu, 2020. "Scripting Indian and Chinese urban spatial transformation: Adding new narratives to gentrification and suburbanisation research," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 980-997, September.
    10. Griet Steel & Salaheldin Abukashawa & Mohamed Osman Hussein, 2020. "Urban Transformations and Land Governance in Peri‐Urban Khartoum: The Case of Soba," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(1), pages 45-59, February.
    11. Hu, Xiaoliang & Li, Hongbo & Zhang, Xiaolin & Yuan, Yuan & Jia, Kaiyang, 2024. "How rent facilitates capital accumulation: A case study of rural land capitalization in Suzhou, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Wubneh, Mulatu, 2018. "Policies and praxis of land acquisition, use, and development in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 170-183.
    13. Laura Schoenberger & Alice Beban, 2021. "Rupturing violent land imaginaries: finding hope through a land titling campaign in Cambodia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 301-312, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goodburn, Charlotte, 2025. "Urbanising the Villages: Three modes of village incorporation and the implications for structural transition in India’s “Chinese-style” special economic zones (SEZs)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Patil, Vikram & Ghosh, Ranjan & Kathuria, Vinish & Farrell, Katharine N., 2020. "Money, Land or self-employment? Understanding preference heterogeneity in landowners’ choices for compensation under land acquisition in India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    4. Quinn Slobodian, 2024. "Time zones," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(7), pages 2047-2051, October.
    5. Kao-Lee Liaw & Lei Xu, 2013. "Changes in Wage Distributions of Wage Earners in Canada: 2000-2005," Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports 451, McMaster University.
    6. Audrey Irvine-Broque, 2025. "Shifting baselines: From austerity to additionality in the mangrove forest," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 57(8), pages 1169-1189, November.
    7. Patricia Fernández-Kelly & Douglas S. Massey, 2007. "Borders for Whom? The Role of NAFTA in Mexico-U.S. Migration," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 610(1), pages 98-118, March.
    8. Rashid Khan, Haroon Ur & Islam, Talat & Yousaf, Sheikh Usman & Zaman, Khalid & Shoukry, Alaa Mohamd & Sharkawy, Mohamed A. & Gani, Showkat & Aamir, Alamzeb & Hishan, Sanil S., 2019. "The impact of financial development indicators on natural resource markets: Evidence from two-step GMM estimator," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 240-255.
    9. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2022. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework: An update," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    10. Carol Upadhya, 2017. "Amaravati and the New Andhra," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 177-202, August.
    11. Matthijs Bal & Andy Brookes, 2022. "How Sustainable Is Human Resource Management Really? An Argument for Radical Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Nikita Sud, 2020. "The Unfixed State of Unfixed Land," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 51(5), pages 1175-1198, September.
    13. Shuanglei Zhou & Shaojun Chen, 2023. "The Impact of the Anti-Poverty Relocation and Settlement Program on Farmers’ Livelihood: Perspective of Livelihood Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Woods, Kevin M., 2020. "Smaller-scale land grabs and accumulation from below: Violence, coercion and consent in spatially uneven agrarian change in Shan State, Myanmar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Prathiwi Widyatmi Putri, 2024. "The political: A view from Jakarta’s kampungs," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(3), pages 979-987, May.
    16. Kim Knipprath, 2024. "Inclusive Neoliberalism in Wilhelmsburg: The Role of the State and the Middle‐Class in Hamburg's Majority–Minority District," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    17. Babalola, Taiwo Oladapo, 2025. "Understanding how equitable and efficient land governance can influence environmental sustainability status: Evidence from Ibadan, Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Nick Bernards, 2019. "Tracing mutations of neoliberal development governance: ‘Fintech’, failure and the politics of marketization," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1442-1459, October.
    19. Zhang, Shouguo & Zhang, Jianjun & Dai, Yixin & Zhang, Ling, 2025. "Mitigating conflicts in the implementation of intensive land use policies: Insights from a tripartite evolutionary game model," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    20. Fulong Wu, 2018. "Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(7), pages 1383-1399, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1483-:d:1703639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.