IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1298-d1681924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geotourism: A Landscape Conservation Approach in Țara Hațegului, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela-Ioana Guju

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Nicolae Bălcescu Avenue No. 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Gabor-Giovani Luca

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Nicolae Bălcescu Avenue No. 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Laura Comănescu

    (Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest, Nicolae Bălcescu Avenue No. 1, 010041 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This study focuses on Țara Hațegului, a region with significant geological, ecological, and cultural resources, and examines how geosites can inform development strategies that promote geotourism while supporting landscape conservation. The research addresses the need to better integrate geosites into spatial planning by conducting geosite assessment and mapping, overlay analysis with settlement typologies, geosite density analysis, and delineation of priority landscape conservation areas. A methodological framework was developed, combining geospatial analysis, site-specific evaluation, and strategic zoning to support planning and decision-making. In the results, 48 geosites were identified and assessed, out of which 7 were classified as having high Potential Touristic Use (PTU), 13 as moderate, and 28 as low. Spatial analysis revealed that most high-PTU geosites are located in rural or adjacent uninhabited areas, indicating both development opportunities and infrastructural constraints. A geosite density map highlighted clusters suitable for coordinated management, while a prioritization model delineated three landscape conservation zones based on geosite value and distribution. The SWOT analysis further contextualized these findings, outlining strengths such as the region’s rich geoheritage and multi-layered protection, as well as limitations linked to infrastructure and management capacity. By positioning geosites as territorial assets, the research highlights their potential to support sustainable, place-based strategies in regions where geological heritage is a defining element of the local landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela-Ioana Guju & Gabor-Giovani Luca & Laura Comănescu, 2025. "Geotourism: A Landscape Conservation Approach in Țara Hațegului, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1298-:d:1681924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1298/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1298/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaoping Gu & Carter A. Hunt & Xiang Jia & Lijun Niu, 2022. "Evaluating Nature-Based Tourism Destination Attractiveness with a Fuzzy-AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Nicoletta Santangelo & Ettore Valente, 2020. "Geoheritage and Geotourism Resources," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-5, June.
    3. Miriam Edith Pérez-Romero & José Álvarez-García & Martha Beatriz Flores-Romero & Donaji Jiménez-Islas, 2023. "UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation: Analysis of Scientific Production," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Edison Navarrete & Fernando Morante-Carballo & Jairo Dueñas-Tovar & Paúl Carrión-Mero & María Jaya-Montalvo & Edgar Berrezueta, 2022. "Assessment of Geosites within a Natural Protected Area: A Case Study of Cajas National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Andrea Ferrando & Francesco Faccini & Guido Paliaga & Paola Coratza, 2021. "A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sallam, Emad S. & Ruban, Dmitry A. & Ermolaev, Vladimir A., 2022. "Geoheritage resources and new direction of infrastructural growth in Egypt: From geosite assessment to policy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Ionel Haidu & Zsolt Magyari-Sáska & Adrian Niță, 2024. "Attractiveness Assessment Model for Evaluating an Area for a Potential Geopark—Case Study: Hațeg UNESCO Global Geopark (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Sabando-Vera, David & Montalván-Burbano, Néstor & Parrales-Guerrero, Katherine & Yonfá-Medranda, Marcela & Plaza-Úbeda, José Antonio, 2025. "Growing a greener future: A bibliometric analysis of green innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. Muhammad Arifin Nasution & Agus Purwoko & Wanda Kuswanda & Nurdin Sulistiyono & Muhammad Fuad Abdullah & Seca Gandaseca & Badli Esham Ahmad & Yarina Ahmad & Reny Khaerany Nisfiary & Rizkia Amalia Adin, 2025. "Development Priority Policies for Impact Control and the Recovery of Natural Tourism in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic in North Sumatra Province, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    6. José Luis Sánchez-Cortez & Kathleen Vélez-Macías & Vinicio Macas-Espinosa & Clelia Naranjo-Freire, 2023. "Characterization of Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of the Fluvial-Glacial Landscapes in the Culebrillas Lagoon (Ecuador)," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Karina Tessar, 2025. "Assessment of the Tourism Potential of the Weltyn Lake District," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 798-808.
    8. Tianyu Rong & Shuting Xu & Yayan Lu & Yanjun Tong & Zhaoping Yang, 2022. "Quantitative Assessment of Spatial Pattern of Geodiversity in the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Pietro Marescotti & Giulia Castello & Antonino Briguglio & Maria Cristina Caprioglio & Laura Crispini & Marco Firpo, 2022. "Geosite Assessment in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Liguria, Italy): A Case Study in Linking Geoheritage with Education, Tourism, and Community Involvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Adrian-Florin Niță & Zsolt Magyari-Sáska & Marie-Luise Frey & Alpár Horváth, 2025. "Twenty-Five Years of Scientific Production on Geoparks from the Perspective of Bibliometric Analysis Using PRISMA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-30, March.
    11. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Qualitative-Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity of Western Samoa (SW Pacific) to Identify Places of Interest for Further Geoconservation, Geoeducation, and Geotourism Development," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Borut Stojilković, 2022. "Towards Transferable Use of Terrain Ruggedness Component in the Geodiversity Index," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Miguel Gurumendi-Noriega & Juan Cumbe-Vásquez & Lady Bravo-Montero & Paúl Carrión-Mero, 2022. "Georesources as an Alternative for Sustainable Development in COVID-19 Times—A Study Case in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    14. Paola Coratza & Irene Maria Bollati & Valeria Panizza & Pierluigi Brandolini & Doriano Castaldini & Franco Cucchi & Giacomo Deiana & Maurizio Del Monte & Francesco Faccini & Furio Finocchiaro & Dario , 2021. "Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-37, October.
    15. Zorlu, Kuttusi & Polat, Selahattin & Yılmaz, Ali & Dede, Volkan, 2024. "An integrated fuzzy-rough multi-criteria group decision-making model for quantitative assessment of geoheritage resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Judith Nyulas & Ștefan Dezsi & Adrian Niță & Raluca-Andreea Toma & Ana-Maria Lazăr, 2024. "Trends and Future Directions in Analysing Attractiveness of Geoparks Using an Automated Merging Method of Multiple Databases—R-Based Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-30, October.
    17. Tomasz Bartuś & Wojciech Mastej, 2023. "Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    18. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2023. "Recognition of Potential Geosites Utilizing a Hydrological Model within Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Abhik Chakraborty, 2022. "Geodiversity and Tourism Sustainability in the Anthropocene," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, June.
    20. Monika Bachinger & Ion Holban & Rainer Luick & Matthias Schickhofer, 2025. "Changes in the Touristic Attractiveness of Wild Forests Due to Forestry Activities? The Case of Romania’s Făgăraş Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1298-:d:1681924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.