IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4413-d1654421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the Touristic Attractiveness of Wild Forests Due to Forestry Activities? The Case of Romania’s Făgăraş Mountains

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Bachinger

    (University of Applied Forest Sciences, Schadenweilerhof, D-72109 Rottenburg am Neckar, Germany)

  • Ion Holban

    (Independent Researcher, Ecaterina Varga, no. 30, 600204 Bacău, Romania)

  • Rainer Luick

    (University of Applied Forest Sciences, Schadenweilerhof, D-72109 Rottenburg am Neckar, Germany)

  • Matthias Schickhofer

    (Independent Researcher, Lainzer Straße 10, 1130 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Wilderness areas are declining worldwide. A major reason is large-scale forestry activities like logging. At the same time, wilderness offers unique opportunities for recreation in natural and remote environments, enabling communities to gather economic income based on wilderness tourism. An outstanding element of wilderness areas is primary forests. Wilderness is often understood as untouched nature, unchanged by human intervention. For visitors, wilderness resembles a counter-world, enabling them to escape from everyday life. The present study investigates whether forestry activities have an effect on the attractiveness of primary forests for wilderness tourism. This question is answered based on a case study in the Făgăraş Mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania). The findings show that primary forests are a unique selling point in tourism. Forestry activities are associated with direct (loss of biodiversity) and indirect (change of target group) effects. Forestry activities not only cause changes in forests as a tourism attractor, but also change the attractor’s contexts, by rendering access difficult or by destroying hiking trails. This paper makes theoretical and practical contributions. From a theoretical point of view, it reflects the concept of wilderness tourism and highlights the importance of contexts (i.e., access paths) for the attractiveness of wild forests. From a practical point of view, it highlights the importance of distinguishing various target groups and different degrees of naturalness to maintain a nuanced portfolio of recreational opportunities in wild forests, for example by referring to established management tools like the recreation opportunity spectrum.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Bachinger & Ion Holban & Rainer Luick & Matthias Schickhofer, 2025. "Changes in the Touristic Attractiveness of Wild Forests Due to Forestry Activities? The Case of Romania’s Făgăraş Mountains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4413-:d:1654421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt, Len M. & Boxall, Peter & Englin, Jeffrey & Haider, Wolfgang, 2005. "Remote tourism and forest management: a spatial hedonic analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 101-113, April.
    2. Bianca Mitrică & Paul-Răzvan Şerban & Irena Mocanu & Nicoleta Damian & Ines Grigorescu & Monica Dumitraşcu & Cristina Dumitrică, 2021. "Developing an Indicator-Based Framework to Measure Sustainable Tourism in Romania. A Territorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Agnieszka Ziernicka-Wojtaszek & Magdalena Malec, 2021. "Evaluating Local Attractiveness for Tourism and Recreation—A Case Study of the Communes in Brzeski County, Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Mihai Voda & Adrian Torpan & Lucian Moldovan, 2017. "Wild Carpathia Future Development: From Illegal Deforestation to ORV Sustainable Recreation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Mirela Ștefănică & Christiana Brigitte Sandu & Gina Ionela Butnaru & Alina-Petronela Haller, 2021. "The Nexus between Tourism Activities and Environmental Degradation: Romanian Tourists’ Opinions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Daniela Sorea & Codrina Csesznek, 2020. "The Groups of Caroling Lads from Făgăraș Land (Romania) as Niche Tourism Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Xiaoping Gu & Carter A. Hunt & Xiang Jia & Lijun Niu, 2022. "Evaluating Nature-Based Tourism Destination Attractiveness with a Fuzzy-AHP Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Anna Dóra Sæþórsdóttir & Edita Tverijonaite, 2024. "Wilderness as Tourism Destination: Place Meanings and Preferences of Tourism Service Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Gerd Lupp & Bernhard Förster & Valerie Kantelberg & Tim Markmann & Johannes Naumann & Carolina Honert & Marc Koch & Stephan Pauleit, 2016. "Assessing the Recreation Value of Urban Woodland Using the Ecosystem Service Approach in Two Forests in the Munich Metropolitan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Chris Dunn, 2024. "The Unappreciated Significance and Source of Meaning in Wild Landscapes: An Arctic Case," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(6), pages 626-647, December.
    11. Moreno Di Marco & Simon Ferrier & Tom D. Harwood & Andrew J. Hoskins & James E. M. Watson, 2019. "Wilderness areas halve the extinction risk of terrestrial biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 573(7775), pages 582-585, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina-Petronela Haller & Georgia-Daniela Tacu Hârșan, 2023. "Longitudinal Analysis of Sustainable Tourism Potential of the Black Sea Riparian States Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Law, Elizabeth A. & Macchi, Leandro & Baumann, Matthias & Decarre, Julieta & Gavier-Pizarro, Gregorio & Levers, Christian & Mastrangelo, Matías E. & Murray, Francisco & Müller, Daniel & Piquer-Rodrígu, 2021. "Fading opportunities for mitigating agriculture-environment trade-offs in a south American deforestation hotspot," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 262.
    3. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    4. Guangdong Li & Chuanglin Fang & James E. M. Watson & Siao Sun & Wei Qi & Zhenbo Wang & Jianguo Liu, 2024. "Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Francisco J. Sarabia-Sánchez & Juan M. Bruno & Francisco Sarabia-Andreu & Maria A. Moreno-Micol, 2025. "The Impact of Eco-Degradation on Residential Tourism: The Case of the Mar Menor, Spain," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, February.
    6. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:118-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:osf:socarx:qy76a_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Loïc Lévi & Jean Jacques Nowak & Sylvain Petit & Hakim Hammadou, 2022. "Industrial legacy and hotel pricing: An application of spatial hedonic pricing analysis in Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(4), pages 870-898, June.
    9. Mary-Ann Cooper & Raquel Camprubí & Erdogan Koc & Ralf Buckley, 2021. "Digital Destination Matching: Practices, Priorities and Predictions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Xinyu Ouyang & Xiangyu Luo, 2022. "Models for Assessing Urban Ecosystem Services: Status and Outlooks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Ralf C. Buckley & Sonya Underdahl, 2023. "Tourism and Environment: Ecology, Management, Economics, Climate, Health, and Politics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, October.
    12. Celia Bilbao-Terol & Verónica Cañal-Fernández & Luis Valdés & Eduardo Del Valle, 2017. "Rural Tourism Accommodation Prices by Land Use-Based Hedonic Approach: First Results from the Case Study of the Self-Catering Cottages in Asturias," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Amira-Andreea Sava & Camelia Teodorescu & Aurel Gheorghilaş & Mioara Clius, 2022. "Sport Event Tourism in Bucharest. UEFA EURO 2020 Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, November.
    14. Carmen Galán-Acedo & Gabriela Pacheco Hass & Vinícius Klain & Pedro Bencke & Júlio César Bicca-Marques, 2024. "Urban Matrices Threaten Patch Occurrence of Howler Monkeys in Anthropogenic Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Gerd Lupp & Valerie Kantelberg & Bernhard Förster & Carolina Honert & Johannes Naumann & Tim Markmann & Stephan Pauleit, 2021. "Visitor Counting and Monitoring in Forests Using Camera Traps: A Case Study from Bavaria (Southern Germany)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    16. Jones, Benjamin A., 2021. "Planting urban trees to improve quality of life? The life satisfaction impacts of urban afforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Zamora, R. & Molina-Martínez, J.R. & Herrera, M.A. & Rodríguez y Silva, F., 2010. "A model for wildfire prevention planning in game resources," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 19-26.
    18. Despina Saghin & Luminița-Mirela Lăzărescu & Liliana Daniela Diacon & Maria Grosu, 2022. "Residents’ Perceptions of Tourism: A Decisive Variable in Stimulating Entrepreneurial Intentions and Activities in Tourism in the Mountainous Rural Area of the North-East Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-30, August.
    19. Norbert Gergely, 2024. "Review Of The Pandemic Period, Reorganization Of The Szeklerland’S Tourism Offer," Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 9(2), pages 95-105, September.
    20. Mueller, Julie M. & Loomis, John B., 2008. "Spatial Dependence in Hedonic Property Models: Do Different Corrections For Spatial Dependence Result in Economically Significant Differences in Estimated Implicit Prices?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(2), pages 1-20.
    21. Neupane, Anish & Boxall, Peter C. & Pelletier, Rick, 2004. "Assessing the recreation values at risk from wildfire: an exploratory analysis," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19986, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    22. Tom Greaves, 2024. "The ecology of finitude," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(6), pages 579-584, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4413-:d:1654421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.