IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p959-d1645729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Evolution of Plot Morphology and Design Strategies in Built Heritage Renewal in Central Shanghai from the Perspective of Sharing Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenyu Li

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Mengxun Liu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Yichen Zhu

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Urban Renewal and Spatial Optimization Technology, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

With the rise of the sharing economy and the concept of the sharing city, the field of urban renewal is facing new opportunities and challenges. This paper innovatively explores built heritage renewal in central Shanghai from the perspective of the sharing economy, focusing on the evolution of plot morphology and associated design strategies. Six representative cases, selected within the framework of three urban renewal policies from 1999 to the present, are analyzed using a diachronic method based on the Conzen school and the street frontage index. Combined with historical maps, aerial photographs, and satellite images, the paper analyzes the changes in plot morphology from 1999 to 2024. The paper highlights how the introduction of sharing city principles significantly impacted plot morphology, facilitating the expansion and diversification of space use and driving the restructuring of plot boundaries, including physical, property, and activity boundaries. The study further reveals how the shared city concept has led to the emergence of privately owned public spaces. Additionally, the paper discusses the pursuit of flow, openness, and sharing in urban renewal, noting how these factors have shifted the focus from purely rentable and sellable areas to more efficient space resource allocation, optimizing spatial configurations. Finally, the paper introduces the concept of “sharing by transfer”, proposing that adjustments to plot boundaries under the sharing economy framework can foster more equitable, efficient, and sustainable urban renewal, providing new perspectives and strategic recommendations for built heritage renewal.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenyu Li & Mengxun Liu & Yichen Zhu, 2025. "The Evolution of Plot Morphology and Design Strategies in Built Heritage Renewal in Central Shanghai from the Perspective of Sharing Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:959-:d:1645729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/959/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/959/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jala Makhzoumi & Howayda Al-Harithy & Mariam Bazzi, 2024. "Contextualizing UNESCO’s Historic Urban Landscape Approach: A Framework for Identifying Modern Heritage in Post-Blast Beirut," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Harry den Hartog, 2021. "Shanghai’s Regenerated Industrial Waterfronts: Urban Lab for Sustainability Transitions?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 181-196.
    3. Xiaohua Zhong & Ho Hon Leung, 2019. "Exploring Participatory Microregeneration as Sustainable Renewal of Built Heritage Community: Two Case Studies in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Steven Kane Curtis & Matthias Lehner, 2019. "Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Harry den Hartog, 2021. "Shanghai’s Regenerated Industrial Waterfronts: Urban Lab for Sustainability Transitions?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 181-196.
    6. Yidan Cao & Xiaomin Tang, 2022. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Community Public Open Space Renewal: A Case Study of the Ruijin Community, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Jun Jiang & Tongguang Zang & Jianglong Xing & Konomi Ikebe, 2023. "Spatial Distribution of Urban Heritage and Landscape Approach to Urban Contextual Continuity: The Case of Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    8. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    9. Hokyung Chung & Jongoh Lee, 2023. "Modern Industrial Heritage as Cultural Mediation in Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of Gunsan, Korea, and Taipei, Taiwan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Yichen Zhu & Zhenyu Li, 2024. "‘Sharing’ as a Critical Framework for Waterfront Heritage Regeneration: A Case Study of Suzhou Creek, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Liu, Guiwen & Fu, Xinyue & Han, Qingye & Huang, Ruopeng & Zhuang, Taozhi, 2021. "Research on the collaborative governance of urban regeneration based on a Bayesian network: The case of Chongqing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinpeng Wu & Jing Xiong, 2022. "How Governance Tools Facilitate Citizen Co-Production Behavior in Urban Community Micro-Regeneration: Evidence from Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Carola Hein, 2021. "Port City Porosity: Boundaries, Flows, and Territories," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9.
    3. Yichen Zhu & Zhenyu Li, 2024. "‘Sharing’ as a Critical Framework for Waterfront Heritage Regeneration: A Case Study of Suzhou Creek, Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Zhao, Taiyang & Lu, Yan & Lynette Wang, Valerie & Wu, Banggang & Chen, Zhi & Song, Wei & Zhou, Liying, 2023. "Shared but unhappy? Detrimental effects of using shared products on psychological ownership and consumer happiness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Jinkun Yang & Linchuan Yang & Haitao Ma, 2022. "Community Participation Strategy for Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Xiamen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Manuel Sánchez-Pérez & Nuria Rueda-López & María Belén Marín-Carrillo & Eduardo Terán-Yépez, 2021. "Theoretical dilemmas, conceptual review and perspectives disclosure of the sharing economy: a qualitative analysis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 1849-1883, October.
    8. Yuan Wang & Chengxie Jin & Tiebo Wang & Danyang Xu, 2025. "The Interpretation of Historical Layer Evolution Laws in Historic Districts from the Perspective of the Historic Urban Landscape: A Case Study in Shenyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-37, May.
    9. Simeng Li & Zhimin Liu & Chao Ye, 2022. "Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai’s Inner City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Suzanne, Elodie & Absi, Nabil & Borodin, Valeria, 2020. "Towards circular economy in production planning: Challenges and opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 168-190.
    11. Thomas Derave & Tiago Princes Sales & Frederik Gailly & Geert Poels, 2022. "Sharing Platform Ontology Development: Proof-of-Concept," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Bart Cammaerts, 2011. "Disruptive sharing in a digital age: rejecting neoliberalism?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 32857, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Eirini Triantafyllidou & Anastasia Zabaniotou, 2022. "From Theory to Praxis: ‘Go Sustainable Living’ Survey for Exploring Individuals Consciousness Level of Decision-Making and Action-Taking in Daily Life Towards a Green Citizenship," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 113-139, March.
    14. Jianjia He & Thi Hoai Thuong Mai, 2021. "The Circular Economy: A Study on the Use of Airbnb for Sustainable Coastal Development in the Vietnam Mekong Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Michaël Distelmans & Ilse Scheerlinck, 2021. "Institutional Strategies in the Ridesharing Economy: A Content Analysis Based on Uber’s Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Igor M. Stepnov & Yulia A. Kovalchuk, 2020. "Measuring value created by business models in the sharing economy," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(5), pages 58-69, November.
    17. Emeka Ndaguba & Cina Van Zyl, 2023. "Professionalizing Sharing Platforms for Sustainable Growth in the Hospitality Sector: Insights Gained through Hierarchical Linear Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Dalia Perkumienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Biruta Švagždienė, 2021. "The Sharing Economy towards Sustainable Tourism: An Example of an Online Transport-sharing Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Alessandra Chiarini & Lorenzo Compagnucci, 2022. "Blockchain, Data Protection and P2P Energy Trading: A Review on Legal and Economic Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Anne Bäro & Felix Toepler & Timo Meynhardt & Vivek K. Velamuri, 2022. "Participating in the sharing economy: The role of individual characteristics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3715-3735, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:959-:d:1645729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.