IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p825-d1632042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Natural Climate Solutions in Long-Term Climate Strategies: Opportunities for Enhanced Mitigation Across the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Giulio Di Lallo

    (Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Division on Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), Via Garbini n. 51, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Chiara De Notaris

    (Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Division on Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), Via Garbini n. 51, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Maria Vincenza Chiriacò

    (Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Division on Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), Via Garbini n. 51, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

Effective national strategies must be carefully planned in advance to position the land sector as a pivotal contributor to achieving the 2050 climate neutrality target set by the European Union (EU) under the Paris Agreement. Governments define their pathways to achieve the climate goals through the long-term low emission development strategies (LTSs), which describe policies and measures for a just and socially fair transition to low greenhouse gas. This paper explores the natural climate solutions foreseen by the available twenty-five LTSs in the EU to assess each country’s use and potential of land mitigation. Subsequently, it evaluates if better planning is possible to increase carbon storage and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We found that most of the analyzed twenty-five EU countries envisage a wide set of natural climate solutions, demonstrating an understand of importance of land policies and measures to meet their climate targets. Sustainable forest management, agroforestry, and healthy and sustainable diets emerge as solutions mostly reported and with the largest mitigation potential across the EU, albeit with large variability among countries. However, some countries could further harness the potential for mitigation in the land sector. This study highlights how some countries could improve their LTSs, accounting for their specific land mitigation potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulio Di Lallo & Chiara De Notaris & Maria Vincenza Chiriacò, 2025. "Evaluating Natural Climate Solutions in Long-Term Climate Strategies: Opportunities for Enhanced Mitigation Across the European Union," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:825-:d:1632042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/825/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/825/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurowska, Krystyna & Kryszk, Hubert & Marks-Bielska, Renata & Mika, Monika & Leń, Przemysław, 2020. "Conversion of agricultural and forest land to other purposes in the context of land protection: Evidence from Polish experience," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Daigneault, Adam & Favero, Alice, 2021. "Global forest management, carbon sequestration and bioenergy supply under alternative shared socioeconomic pathways," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Mosquera-Losada, María Rosa & Rodríguez-Rigueiro, Francico Javier & Santiago-Freijanes, José Javier & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, Antonio & Silva-Losada, Pablo & Pantera, Anastasia & Fernández-Lorenzo, Juan L, 2022. "European agroforestry policy promotion in arable Mediterranean areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Wójcik-Leń & Przemysław Leń, 2021. "Evaluation of the Symmetry of Statistical Methods Applied for the Identification of Agricultural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Junmin Wei & Manhong Shen, 2022. "Analysis of the Efficiency of Forest Carbon Sinks and Its Influencing Factors—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Czarnecki, Adam & Milczarek-Andrzejewska, Dominika & Widła-Domaradzki, Łukasz & Jórasz-Żak, Anna, 2023. "Conflict dynamics over farmland use in the multifunctional countryside," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Dawid Wojciech & Bielecka Elżbieta, 2022. "GIS-Based Land Cover Analysis and Prediction Based on Open-Source Software and Data," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 41(3), pages 75-86, September.
    5. Hongge Zhu & Yingli Cai & Hong Lin & Yuchen Tian, 2022. "Impacts of Cross-Sectoral Climate Policy on Forest Carbon Sinks and Their Spatial Spillover: Evidence from Chinese Provincial Panel Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Daiva Juknelienė & Vaiva Kazanavičiūtė & Jolanta Valčiukienė & Virginija Atkocevičienė & Gintautas Mozgeris, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Land-Use Changes in Lithuania," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, June.
    7. Xinhai Lu & Yanwei Zhang & Chaoran Lin & Feng Wu, 2021. "Evolutionary Overview and Prediction of Themes in the Field of Land Degradation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Luise Meissner & Lisa Kappenberg & Oliver Musshoff, 2022. "An Analytical Framework for Evaluating Farmland Market Regulation: Examining the German Land Transaction Law," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Dominika Milczarek-Andrzejewska & Jerzy Wilkin & Renata Marks-Bielska & Adam Czarnecki & Anna Bartczak, 2020. "Konflikty o ziemię rolną – perspektywa ekonomiczna," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 5-31.
    10. Jena, Ananta Kumar, 2024. "Tree plantation for implementing the land utilization policies incorporate with sustainable development towards environmental concerns in Assam, India," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Žana Jurjević & Stanislav Zekić & Danilo Đokić & Bojan Matkovski, 2021. "Regional Spatial Approach to Differences in Rural Economic Development: Insights from Serbia," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Malgorzata Busko & Michal Apollo, 2023. "Public Administration and Landowners Facing Real Estate Cadastre Modernization: A Win-Lose or Win-Win Situation?," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Arkadiusz Piwowar, 2020. "Agricultural Biogas—An Important Element in the Circular and Low-Carbon Development in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    14. Favero, Alice & Sohngen, Brent & Hamilton, W. Parker, 2022. "Climate change and timber in Latin America: Will the forestry sector flourish under climate change?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    15. Baker, Justin S. & Van Houtven, George & Phelan, Jennifer & Latta, Gregory & Clark, Christopher M. & Austin, Kemen G. & Sodiya, Olakunle E. & Ohrel, Sara B. & Buckley, John & Gentile, Lauren E. & Mart, 2023. "Projecting U.S. forest management, market, and carbon sequestration responses to a high-impact climate scenario," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    16. Zhao, Jianheng & Daigneault, Adam & Weiskittel, Aaron & Wei, Xinyuan, 2023. "Climate and socioeconomic impacts on Maine's forests under alternative future pathways," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Hubert Kryszk & Krystyna Kurowska & Renata Marks-Bielska, 2022. "Legal and Socio-Economic Conditions Underlying the Shaping of the Agricultural System in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Csomós, György & Szalai, Ádám & Farkas, Jenő Zsolt, 2024. "A sacrifice for the greater good? On the main drivers of excessive land take and land use change in Hungary," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Karner, Katrin & Mitter, Hermine & Sinabell, Franz & Schönhart, Martin, 2024. "Participatory development of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for Austria’s agriculture and food systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    20. Xiaozhe Ma & Leying Wu & Yongbin Zhu & Jing Wu & Yaochen Qin, 2022. "Simulation of Vegetation Carbon Sink of Arbor Forest and Carbon Mitigation of Forestry Bioenergy in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:825-:d:1632042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.