IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i4p817-d1631441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology for Using Dynamic Visualizations to Enhance Citizens Engagement in Mobility Planning in Thessaloniki

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Konstantinidou

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Hellenic Institute of Transport (HIT), 6th km Charilaou, Thermi Rd., 57001 Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Josep Maria Salanova Grau

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (CERTH), Hellenic Institute of Transport (HIT), 6th km Charilaou, Thermi Rd., 57001 Thermi-Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Many cities are developing semantic 3D models as digital representation of their environment to assess the outcomes of the implementation of new mobility services before their real-life piloting. So far, digital twins have reinforced evidence-based approaches for policy-making. The purpose of this paper is to present how digital twins can be used as a tool for vulnerable citizen engagement, improving efficiency of co-creation in mobility planning. An innovative methodological approach of integrating digital twins in engagement processes, by transforming them from real-time data-driven replicas, targeted to the facilitation of the decision-making process for the public authorities to a tool for enhancing citizen engagement in the mobility context has been developed and tested in Thessaloniki Smart Mobility Living Lab. Through a 3-steps workshops’ approach, the mobility needs set by vulnerable users are collected, prioritized and matched with policy plans. By combining citizens feedback with real-time data incorporated in digital twins, citizens receive back visualized scenarios of the impact of specific mobility measures on their neighborhoods. By lifting the citizen engagement in mobility planning to the next participatory level, the results of the study create a bridge between participatory processes and digital twins.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Konstantinidou & Josep Maria Salanova Grau, 2025. "A Methodology for Using Dynamic Visualizations to Enhance Citizens Engagement in Mobility Planning in Thessaloniki," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:817-:d:1631441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/4/817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabian Dembski & Uwe Wössner & Mike Letzgus & Michael Ruddat & Claudia Yamu, 2020. "Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Callcut & Jean-Paul Cerceau Agliozzo & Liz Varga & Lauren McMillan, 2021. "Digital Twins in Civil Infrastructure Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.
    2. Ekaterina V. Orlova, 2022. "Design Technology and AI-Based Decision Making Model for Digital Twin Engineering," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Radtke, Jörg, 2025. "E-participation in energy transitions: What does it mean? Chances and challenges within Germany's Energiewende," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Özden Tozanlı & Elif Kongar & Surendra M. Gupta, 2020. "Evaluation of Waste Electronic Product Trade-in Strategies in Predictive Twin Disassembly Systems in the Era of Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-33, July.
    5. Rebekka Volk & Mihir Rambhia & Elias Naber & Frank Schultmann, 2022. "Urban Resource Assessment, Management, and Planning Tools for Land, Ecosystems, Urban Climate, Water, and Materials—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Haraguchi, Masahiko & Funahashi, Tomomi & Biljecki, Filip, 2024. "Assessing governance implications of city digital twin technology: A maturity model approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Casey R. Corrado & Suzanne M. DeLong & Emily G. Holt & Edward Y. Hua & Andreas Tolk, 2022. "Combining Green Metrics and Digital Twins for Sustainability Planning and Governance of Smart Buildings and Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    8. Aravindi Samarakkody & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh, 2023. "Technological Innovations for Enhancing Disaster Resilience in Smart Cities: A Comprehensive Urban Scholar’s Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Ehab Shahat & Chang T. Hyun & Chunho Yeom, 2021. "City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Chiara Chioni & Camilla Pezzica & Sara Favargiotti, 2024. "Territorial Digital Twins: A key for increasing the community resilience of fragile mountain inner territories?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 1548-1563, April.
    11. Hui Lin & Bingli Xu & Yuting Chen & Wenhang Li & Lan You & Jie He, 2022. "VGEs as a New Platform for Urban Modeling and Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Batel Yossef Ravid & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2023. "The Social Digital Twin:The Social Turn in the Field of Smart CitiesÂ," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(6), pages 1455-1470, July.
    13. Ioannis Kavouras & Emmanuel Sardis & Eftychios Protopapadakis & Ioannis Rallis & Anastasios Doulamis & Nikolaos Doulamis, 2023. "A Low-Cost Gamified Urban Planning Methodology Enhanced with Co-Creation and Participatory Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    14. Zaheer Allam & David Jones, 2021. "Future (post-COVID) digital, smart and sustainable cities in the wake of 6G: Digital twins, immersive realities and new urban economies," Post-Print hal-03477845, HAL.
    15. Mee Kam Ng & Caglar Koksal & Cecilia Wong & Yuanzhou Tang, 2022. "Smart and Sustainable Development from a Spatial Planning Perspective: The Case of Shenzhen and Greater Manchester," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Andreea Orîndaru & Mihaela Constantinescu & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Ștefan-Claudiu Căescu & Margareta Stela Florescu & Ionel Dumitru, 2020. "Rurbanization—Making the City Greener: Young Citizen Implication and Future Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Mona Jabbari & Zahra Ahmadi & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Defining a Digital System for the Pedestrian Network as a Conceptual Implementation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    18. Paz Fernández & Matías Ceacero-Moreno, 2021. "Urban Sustainability and Natural Hazards Management; Designs Using Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    19. Agnieszka Szczepańska & Rafał Kaźmierczak & Monika Myszkowska, 2023. "Smart City Solutions from a Societal Perspective—A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-27, March.
    20. Douay, Nicolas & Lamker, Christian, 2023. "Nouvelles technologies, nouveaux outils, nouvelle organisation de la ville: Vers une nouvelle planification numérique?," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Gustedt, Evelyn & Grabski-Kieron, Ulrike & Demazière, Christophe & Paris, Didier (ed.), Villes et métropoles en France et en Allemagne, volume 21, pages 172-192, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:817-:d:1631441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.