Experts’ Perspectives on Private Forest Owners’ Priorities and Motivations for Voluntary Ecosystem Protection in Lithuania

Lithuania has initiated the development of voluntary ecosystem protection measures within private forests, establishing protection agreements between the state and private forest owners. This article examines the priorities and motivations of private forest owners in the voluntary protection of ecosystems, based on the analysis of expert opinions. The Delphi sociological method was employed to assess expert opinions on the priorities and motivations of private forest owners regarding the voluntary protection of ecosystems. Twenty-nine experts responded to the survey, providing insights into the attitudes of Lithuanian private forest owners towards voluntary forest protection models and contract types, potential environmental protection instruments, the necessity of compensation for losses incurred due to forest management restrictions in protected areas, the proportion of protected forests, factors influencing the intention to engage in forest protection, motivations for voluntary forest protection, the “crowd-out” effect, sources of compensation for losses, the effectiveness of ecosystem protection mechanisms in Lithuanian forests, and the factors that diminish their effectiveness. Summarizing the experts’ findings, it can be concluded that the forest protection priorities of Lithuanian private forest owners, concerning the expansion of protected areas in private forests, protection models, and incentives for protection, are likely to align with the priorities and motivations identified in other European countries. A heterogeneity of priorities and motives was identified. Almost three-quarters of experts thought the current amount of protected forest in Lithuania is sufficient or is already more than necessary, and only about one in ten thought that is necessary for owners to protect more forest. Lithuanian private forest owners are mostly motivated by full financial compensation for losses. According to experts, the majority of private forest owners do not support forest protection models that lack financial compensation. It would be appropriate to implement both permanent and fixed-term protection agreements (contracts) with compensation, alongside the option of selling forests to the state. The level of compensation is identified as the most-significant factor influencing private forest owners’ willingness to engage in ecosystem protection. Experts highlight that the primary reasons for the ineffectiveness of private forest protection measures in Lithuania include inadequate and unjustified compensation, compensation amounts that are too low relative to forest owners’ income, insufficient information, and complex bureaucratic procedures.