IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1458-d1473614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Windthrow Impact on Alpine Forest Humipedon: Soil Microarthropod Communities and Humus Dynamics Five Years after an Extreme Windstorm Event

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Visentin

    (Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy
    Department of Biology, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy)

  • Sara Remelli

    (Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy)

  • Augusto Zanella

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padua, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Cristina Menta

    (Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy)

Abstract

The ecological impact of windthrow disturbance on humipedons and soil microarthropod communities is examined in two areas of the Italian Alps (Val di Fassa and Cansiglio) five years after the Vaia Storm. The following soil coverage conditions were identified: herbaceous vegetation (G), decaying wood (W), no vegetation (B) in windthrow areas; and these were compared with conditions in adjacent undisturbed intact forests (IF) and, only in Val di Fassa, with permanent meadows (M). Soil pH, soil organic matter content (SOM), humus systems and microarthropod communities were analyzed. In Val di Fassa, SOM loss was observed in windthrow areas vs. IF, moving toward a Mull humus system, while G evolved toward M-like conditions, W maintained a thicker O horizon and lower pH and B exhibited severe soil erosion and the lowest SOM. In Cansiglio, windthrow areas showed a slower transition to a Mull system, with a trend toward increasing pH and decreasing SOM. A clear relationship between microarthropod communities and humus systems could not be established because the consistency and biological origins of the humus diagnostic horizons were not considered. Microarthropod communities under different conditions exhibited significant dissimilarity, with varying responses across groups; Shannon and QBS-ar indices remained stable except for a significant decrease in B. Community dissimilarity thus appears to be enhanced by post-windthrow disturbance, suggesting that destructive windstorms may also present an opportunity for enriched microarthropod diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Visentin & Sara Remelli & Augusto Zanella & Cristina Menta, 2024. "Windthrow Impact on Alpine Forest Humipedon: Soil Microarthropod Communities and Humus Dynamics Five Years after an Extreme Windstorm Event," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1458-:d:1473614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rupert Seidl & Mart-Jan Schelhaas & Werner Rammer & Pieter Johannes Verkerk, 2014. "Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 4(9), pages 806-810, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Honkaniemi, Juha & Ojansuu, Risto & Kasanen, Risto & Heliövaara, Kari, 2018. "Interaction of disturbance agents on Norway spruce: A mechanistic model of bark beetle dynamics integrated in simulation framework WINDROT," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 388(C), pages 45-60.
    2. Patrice Loisel & Marielle Brunette & Stéphane Couture, 2022. "Ambiguity, value of information and forest rotation decision under storm risk," Working Papers of BETA 2022-26, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Thomas, J. & Brunette, M. & Leblois, A., 2022. "The determinants of adapting forest management practices to climate change: Lessons from a survey of French private forest owners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Kallio, A. Maarit I. & Solberg, Birger & Käär, Liisa & Päivinen, Risto, 2018. "Economic impacts of setting reference levels for the forest carbon sinks in the EU on the European forest sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 193-201.
    5. Simpkins, Craig E. & Bellingham, Peter J. & Reihana, Kiri & Brock, James M.R. & Perry, George L.W., 2025. "Evaluating the effects of two newly emerging plant pathogens on northern Aotearoa-New Zealand forests using an individual-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 500(C).
    6. Rupert Seidl & Dominik Thom & Markus Kautz & Dario Martin-Benito & Mikko Peltoniemi & Giorgio Vacchiano & Jan Wild & Davide Ascoli & Michal Petr & Juha Honkaniemi & Manfred J. Lexer & Volodymyr Trotsi, 2017. "Forest disturbances under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 395-402, June.
    7. Julie Thomas & Marielle Brunette & Antoine Leblois, 2021. "Adapting forest management practices to climate change : Lessons from a survey of French private forest owners," Working Papers hal-03142772, HAL.
    8. Jarisch, Isabelle & Bödeker, Kai & Bingham, Logan Robert & Friedrich, Stefan & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2022. "The influence of discounting ecosystem services in robust multi-objective optimization – An application to a forestry-avocado land-use portfolio," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Magdalena Majchrzak & Piotr Szczypa & Krzysztof Adamowicz, 2022. "Supply of Wood Biomass in Poland in Terms of Extraordinary Threat and Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Kateřina Novosadová & Jiří Kadlec & Petr Sýkora & Martin Kománek & Radek Pokorný, 2024. "Evaluation of the effect of different thinning types on dendrometric parameters and subsequent spontaneous growth in a beech-oak-linden stand," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(6), pages 299-316.
    11. Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Andrey & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2021. "Assessing the synergistic value of ecosystem services in European beech forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Dymond, Caren Christine & Giles-Hansen, Krysta & Asante, Patrick, 2020. "The forest mitigation-adaptation nexus: Economic benefits of novel planting regimes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:10-2024-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Assmuth, Aino & Autto, Hilja & Halonen, Kirsi-Maria & Haltia, Emmi & Huttunen, Suvi & Lintunen, Jussi & Lonkila, Annika & Nieminen, Tiina M. & Ojanen, Paavo & Peltoniemi, Mikko & Pietilä, Kaisa & Pohj, 2024. "Forest carbon payments: A multidisciplinary review of policy options for promoting carbon storage in EU member states," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    15. Louis, Marceau & Toffin, Etienne & Gregoire, Jean-Claude & Deneubourg, Jean-Louis, 2016. "Modelling collective foraging in endemic bark beetle populations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 188-199.
    16. Zdeněk Vacek & Ivana Tomášková & Zdeněk Fuchs & Václav Šimůnek & Stanislav Vacek & Jan Cukor & Lukáš Bílek & Josef Gallo & Karel Zlatuška & Martin Duchan, 2025. "Impact of technical water retention on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) resilience and growth dynamics," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(3), pages 124-137.
    17. Montagné-Huck, Claire & Brunette, Marielle, 2018. "Economic analysis of natural forest disturbances: A century of research," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 42-71.
    18. Giovanni B. Concu & Claudio Detotto & Marco Vannini, 2021. "Drivers of intentions and drivers of actions: willingness toparticipate versus actual participation in fire management inSardinia, Italy," Working Papers 018, Laboratoire Lieux, Identités, eSpaces et Activités (LISA).
    19. Tie Zhang & Guijie Ding & Jiangping Zhang & Yujiao Qi, 2022. "Contributions of Biotic and Abiotic Factors to the Spatial Heterogeneity of Aboveground Biomass in Subtropical Forests: A Case Study of Guizhou Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    20. Ali Jahani & Maryam Saffariha, 2022. "Tree failure prediction model (TFPM): machine learning techniques comparison in failure hazard assessment of Platanus orientalis in urban forestry," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 881-898, January.
    21. Luca Nonini & Marco Fiala, 2022. "Assessment of Forest Wood and Carbon Stock at the Stand Level: First Results of a Modeling Approach for an Italian Case Study Area of the Central Alps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1458-:d:1473614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.