IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i9p1387-d1466537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Urban Carbon Storage and Its Dynamics Using InVEST Model

Author

Listed:
  • Richa Sharma

    (Amity School of Natural Resources & Sustainable Development, Amity University, Sector—125, Noida 201313, India)

  • Lolita Pradhan

    (Amity School of Natural Resources & Sustainable Development, Amity University, Sector—125, Noida 201313, India)

  • Maya Kumari

    (Amity School of Natural Resources & Sustainable Development, Amity University, Sector—125, Noida 201313, India)

  • Prodyut Bhattacharya

    (School of Environmental Management, Block ‘A’, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, New Delhi 110078, India)

  • Varun Narayan Mishra

    (Amity Institute of Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, Amity University, Sector—125, Noida 201313, India)

  • Deepak Kumar

    (Atmospheric Science Research Center (ASRC), State University of New York (SUNY), Albany, NY 12226, USA)

Abstract

Carbon storage estimates are essential for sustainable urban planning and development. This study examines the spatio-temporal effects of land use and land cover changes on the provision and monetary value of above- and below-ground carbon sequestration and storage during 2011, 2019, and the simulated year 2027 in Noida. The Google Earth Engine-Random Forests (GEE-RF) classifier, the Cellular Automata Artificial Neural Network (CA-ANN) model, and the InVEST-CCS model are some of the software tools applied for the analysis. The findings demonstrate that the above- and below-ground carbon storage for Noida is 23.95 t/ha. Carbon storage in the city increased between 2011 and 2019 by approximately 67%. For the predicted year 2027, a loss in carbon storage is recorded. The simulated land cover for the year 2027 indicates that if the current pattern continues for the next decade, the majority of the land will be transformed into either built-up or barren land. This predicted decline in agriculture and vegetation would further lead to a slump in the potential for terrestrial carbon sequestration. Urban carbon storage estimates provide past records to serve as a baseline and a precursor to study future changes, and therefore more such city-scale analyses are required for overall urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Richa Sharma & Lolita Pradhan & Maya Kumari & Prodyut Bhattacharya & Varun Narayan Mishra & Deepak Kumar, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Urban Carbon Storage and Its Dynamics Using InVEST Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1387-:d:1466537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1387/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/9/1387/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Polasky & Erik Nelson & Derric Pennington & Kris Johnson, 2011. "The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 219-242, February.
    2. Peihao Song & Gunwoo Kim & Audrey Mayer & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian, 2020. "Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Allen, Cameron & Metternicht, Graciela & Wiedmann, Thomas, 2016. "National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 199-207.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lina Ke & Changkun Yin & Nan Lei & Shilin Zhang & Yao Lu & Guangshuai Zhang & Daqi Liu & Quanming Wang, 2025. "An Improved Method for Estimating Blue Carbon Storage in Coastal Salt Marsh Wetlands: Considering the Heterogeneity of Soil Thickness," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valencia Torres, Angélica & Tiwari, Chetan & Atkinson, Samuel F., 2021. "Progress in ecosystem services research: A guide for scholars and practitioners," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    2. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    3. Brendan Fisher & Stephen Polasky & Thomas Sterner, 2011. "Conservation and Human Welfare: Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 151-159, February.
    4. Duy X. Tran & Diane Pearson & Alan Palmer & David Gray, 2020. "Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-29, June.
    5. Shengjun Yan & Xuan Wang & Yanpeng Cai & Chunhui Li & Rui Yan & Guannan Cui & Zhifeng Yang, 2018. "An Integrated Investigation of Spatiotemporal Habitat Quality Dynamics and Driving Forces in the Upper Basin of Miyun Reservoir, North China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Nabernegg, Stefan & Bednar-Friedl, Birgit & Muñoz, Pablo & Titz, Michaela & Vogel, Johanna, 2019. "National Policies for Global Emission Reductions: Effectiveness of Carbon Emission Reductions in International Supply Chains," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 146-157.
    7. Shishay Kiros Weldegebriel & Kumelachew Yeshitela, 2021. "Measuring the Semi-Century Ecosystem-Service Value Variation in Mekelle City Region, Northern Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Kevin Thellmann & Marc Cotter & Sabine Baumgartner & Anna Treydte & Georg Cadisch & Folkard Asch, 2018. "Tipping Points in the Supply of Ecosystem Services of a Mountainous Watershed in Southeast Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Gerling, Charlotte & Drechsler, Martin & Keuler, Klaus & Sturm, Astrid & Wätzold, Frank, 2022. "Time to consider the timing of conservation measures: designing cost-effective agri-environment schemes under climate change," MPRA Paper 113877, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Hanwen Zhang & Yanqing Lang, 2022. "Quantifying and Analyzing the Responses of Habitat Quality to Land Use Change in Guangdong Province, China over the Past 40 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Jingjing Liu & Jing Wang & Tianlin Zhai & Zehui Li, 2022. "The Response of Ecologically Functional Land to Changes in Urban Economic Growth and Transportation Construction in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Moyer, Jonathan D. & Hedden, Steve, 2020. "Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    13. Shaofeng Yuan & Congmou Zhu & Lixia Yang & Fenghua Xie, 2019. "Responses of Ecosystem Services to Urbanization-Induced Land Use Changes in Ecologically Sensitive Suburban Areas in Hangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Jingfeng Zhu & Ning Ding & Dehuan Li & Wei Sun & Yujing Xie & Xiangrong Wang, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Nonlinear Negative Relationship between Urbanization and Habitat Quality in Metropolitan Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Denghui Xu & Xianhua Guo & Teiji Watanabe & Kezhong Liang & Jianing Kou & Xiaolan Jiang, 2023. "Ecological Security Pattern Construction in Rural Settlements Based on Importance and Vulnerability of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of the Southeast Region of Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Hongmi Koo & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2018. "Land Use Scenario Modeling Based on Local Knowledge for the Provision of Ecosystem Services in Northern Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Yonghua Li & Song Yao & Hezhou Jiang & Huarong Wang & Qinchuan Ran & Xinyun Gao & Xinyi Ding & Dandong Ge, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Prediction of Carbon Storage: An Integrated Framework Based on the MOP–PLUS–InVEST Model and an Applied Case Study in Hangzhou, East China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-22, December.
    18. Hoekman, S. Kent & Broch, Amber, 2018. "Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the U.S.: A literature review. Part II – Biodiversity, land use change, GHG emissions, and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3159-3177.
    19. Ma, Shan & Duggan, Jennifer M. & Eichelberger, Bradley A. & McNally, Brynn W. & Foster, Jeffrey R. & Pepi, Eda & Conte, Marc N. & Daily, Gretchen C. & Ziv, Guy, 2016. "Valuation of ecosystem services to inform management of multiple-use landscapes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 6-18.
    20. Zhongwen Xu & Liming Yao, 2023. "Reality check and determinants of carbon emission flow in the context of global trade: Indonesia being the centric studied country," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11973-11997, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:9:p:1387-:d:1466537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.