IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i6p795-d1408540.html

Assessing the Spatial Equity of Multi-Type Health Service Facilities: An Improved Method Integrating Scale Accessibility and Type Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Zeng

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Engineering Research Center of City Intelligence and Digital Governance, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Healthy Habitat and Smart Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jin Zuo

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Engineering Research Center of City Intelligence and Digital Governance, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Healthy Habitat and Smart Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Chen Li

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    Engineering Research Center of City Intelligence and Digital Governance, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, Tianjin 300072, China
    Tianjin Key Laboratory of Healthy Habitat and Smart Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jiancheng Luo

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

Abstract

Ensuring the spatial equity of health service facilities (HSFs) is crucial for the well-being of residents. However, previous research has predominantly focused on the accessibility and equity of single-type facilities, neglecting the residents’ demand for diversified types of health services. This study proposes a multi-type, Gaussian-based, two-step floating catchment area method (MT-G2SFCA) to assess the comprehensive accessibility and equity of multi-type HSFs in different age groups in the Hedong District of Tianjin, with the Gini coefficient and the bivariate local Moran’s I. Furthermore, the key factors affecting the accessibility were explored through a geo-detector. The results indicate the following: (1) Neglecting the health benefits of facility type diversity can result in an underestimation of the accessibility and equity; (2) neglecting the differences in walking ability of the elderly can result in an overestimation of the accessibility and equity; and (3) the Pedestrian Route Directness is the key factor affecting the accessibility and equity in high-density urban areas, and especially that the facility density is the key factor for the elderly. This research emphasizes the impact of facility type diversity on the accessibility and equity of HSFs, which can offer more precise and holistic technical assistance and policy recommendations for optimizing the allocation of HSFs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Zeng & Jin Zuo & Chen Li & Jiancheng Luo, 2024. "Assessing the Spatial Equity of Multi-Type Health Service Facilities: An Improved Method Integrating Scale Accessibility and Type Diversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:795-:d:1408540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/795/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/6/795/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Elldér & Katarina Haugen & Bertil Vilhelmson, 2022. "When local access matters: A detailed analysis of place, neighbourhood amenities and travel choice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 120-139, January.
    2. Yonghua Li & Qinchuan Ran & Song Yao & Likun Ding, 2023. "Evaluation and Optimization of the Layout of Community Public Service Facilities for the Elderly: A Case Study of Hangzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Jiangjun Wan & Yutong Zhao & Kaili Zhang & Chunchi Ma & Haiying Sun & Ziming Wang & Hongyu Wu & Mingjie Li & Lingqing Zhang & Xiaohong Tang & Ying Cao & Li Tang & Jinxiu Yang, 2022. "Healthy Community-Life Circle Planning Combining Objective Measurement and Subjective Evaluation: Theoretical and Empirical Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, April.
    4. Shujin Zhang & Peiheng Yu & Yiyun Chen & Ying Jing & Fanxin Zeng, 2022. "Accessibility of Park Green Space in Wuhan, China: Implications for Spatial Equity in the Post-COVID-19 Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Willberg, Elias & Fink, Christoph & Toivonen, Tuuli, 2023. "The 15-minute city for all? – Measuring individual and temporal variations in walking accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Daoyong Li & Hengyi Zang & Demiao Yu & Qilin He & Xiaoran Huang, 2023. "Study on the Influence Mechanism and Space Distribution Characteristics of Rail Transit Station Area Accessibility Based on MGWR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Xia, Nan & Cheng, Liang & Chen, Song & Wei, XiaoYan & Zong, WenWen & Li, ManChun, 2018. "Accessibility based on Gravity-Radiation model and Google Maps API: A case study in Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 178-190.
    8. Jia Zhao & Wei Su & Jiancheng Luo & Jin Zuo, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Walkability of Children’s School Travel Road for Accessibility and Safety Improvement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Wenbo Cai & Wei Jiang & Hongyu Du & Ruishan Chen & Yongli Cai, 2021. "Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shi, Kunbo & Shao, Rui & Tao, Yinhua & Cheng, Long & Yang, Tianren, 2025. "Does perceived proximity to urban facilities still matter to individuals' daily activities in the information age?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Ke Wang & Ian Mell & Jeremy Carter, 2025. "Exploring the Development of Community Parks in Urban–Rural Fringe Areas in China: Expert and Policy Perspectives on Sustainable Design and Strategy Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Jianwei Li & Yun Chen & Dan Zhao & Jiagang Zhai, 2024. "The Impact of Built Environment on Mixed Land Use: Evidence from Xi’an," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Patrizia Sulis & Paola Proietti, 2024. "Who can access what? Uncovering urban inequality in access to service for senior citizens," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1650-1665, September.
    6. Liping Wang & Xiufeng Sun & Junru Yan & Meiru Xie & Hua Qin, 2025. "Quantitative Assessment of Age-Friendly Design in Mountainous Urban Community Parks Based on Nonlinear Models: An Empirical Study in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, April.
    7. Rahman, Fabiha & Oliver, Robert & Buehler, Ralph & Lee, Jinhyung & Crawford, Thomas & Kim, Junghwan, 2025. "Impacts of point of interest (POI) data selection on 15-Minute City (15-MC) accessibility scores and inequality assessments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    8. Siqi Lai & Brian Deal, 2022. "Parks, Green Space, and Happiness: A Spatially Specific Sentiment Analysis Using Microblogs in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Emily Talen, 2023. "Who can walk? An analysis of public amenity access in America’s ten largest cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(7), pages 1775-1789, September.
    10. Chang You & Hongjiao Qu & Shidong Zhang & Luo Guo, 2024. "Assessment of Uncertainties in Ecological Risk Based on the Prediction of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Evolution," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:7c6d2_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Bangyu Liu & Ning Qiu & Tianjie Zhang, 2023. "Accessibility of Elderly Care Facilities Based on Social Stratification: A Case Study in Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, January.
    13. Chenxi Su & Zhengyan Chen & Yuxuan Cheng & Shaofeng Chen & Wenting Li & Zheng Ding, 2025. "Decoding Multi-Scale Environmental Configurations for Older Adults’ Walkability with Explainable Machine Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-30, September.
    14. Brenda B. Lin & Susan Thompson & Richard Mitchell & Thomas Astell-Burt & Evelyne De Leeuw & Bin Jalaludin & Xiaoqi Feng, 2023. "Policymaker and Practitioner Perceptions of Parks for Health and Wellbeing: Scoping a Holistic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Yihua Sun & Shixian Luo, 2024. "A Study on the Current Situation of Public Service Facilities’ Layout from the Perspective of 15-Minute Communities—Taking Chengdu of Sichuan Province as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Chen, Lu & Liu, Xiuyan & Sun, Tianshi & Ma, Ning & Zhang, Ting, 2025. "Compact urban morphology and the 15-minute city: Evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Yi Huang & Wenjun Wu & Zhenhong Shen & Jie Zhu & Hui Chen, 2025. "Beyond Proximity: Assessing Social Equity in Park Accessibility for Older Adults Using an Improved Gaussian 2SFCA Method," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, October.
    18. Zhen Yin & Lifei Wang & Zhen Xu, 2025. "Retrofit-Oriented Large Parks’ Walking-Shed Evaluation—A Case Study of Rizhao, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, February.
    19. Tongtong Li & Xinrui Fang & Jiaqi Zhu & Qianliu Peng & Wenyu Zhao & Xin Fu, 2024. "Horizontal and Vertical Spatial Equity Analysis Based on Accessibility to Living Service Amenities: A Case Study of Xi’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-30, July.
    20. Bin Xu & Qingxia Shi & Yaping Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation of the Health Promotion Capabilities of Greenway Trails: A Case Study in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    21. Ermagun, Alireza & Janatabadi, Fatemeh & Witlox, Frank, 2025. "Beyond the 15-minute city dichotomy: Time-denominated access to essential services in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:6:p:795-:d:1408540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.