IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i2p231-d1337826.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal Evolution, Spatial Agglomeration and Convergence of Environmental Governance in China—A Comparative Analysis Based on a Basin Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mengzhi Xu

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Shixin Luan

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xuan Gao

    (State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Institute of Land Surface System and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Huachun Wang

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Scientifically measuring the level of environmental governance (EGL) and understanding its spatial convergence has important reference value for ecological governance. In this paper, the global entropy method is applied to measure the EGL of 284 prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2019, which are divided into three major river basins, including the Yellow River, Yangtze River, and Pearl River, to observe the spatial–temporal evolutionary characterization through a standard deviation ellipse model. The coefficient of variation and the spatial econometric model are the tools used to conduct the spatial convergence test. The results are as follows: (1) China’s EGL is low overall, though it is fluctuating upward at low magnitude, and the three major river basins follow the ranking: The Pearl River Basin > The Yangtze River Basin > The Yellow River Basin. (2) Spatially, the distribution pattern of China’s EGL changes from “scattered and sporadic” to “multipolar core”. (3) The center of China’s environmental governance was concentrated in the east from 2007 to 2019, and the EGL in the midstream and downstream regions of the three major river basins increased rapidly. (4) Environmental governance in China has significant absolute and conditional β-convergence characteristics, as do the three major basins, while the ranking of convergence speed remains “Yangtze River Basin > Yellow River Basin > Pearl River Basin”. Of these, economic development accelerated the convergence rate of environmental governance in China and its three major river basins; financial pressure significantly inhibited the convergence of the EGL of the Yellow River Basin. The improvement of the EGL in the Pearl River Basin was also negatively influenced by the industrial structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengzhi Xu & Shixin Luan & Xuan Gao & Huachun Wang, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution, Spatial Agglomeration and Convergence of Environmental Governance in China—A Comparative Analysis Based on a Basin Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:231-:d:1337826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miguel Angel Esquivias & Lilik Sugiharti & Hilda Rohmawati & Omar Rojas & Narayan Sethi, 2022. "Nexus between Technological Innovation, Renewable Energy, and Human Capital on the Environmental Sustainability in Emerging Asian Economies: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Hasanur Rahman & Liton Chandra Voumik & Md. Jamsedul Islam & Md. Abdul Halim & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2022. "Economic Growth, Energy Mix, and Tourism-Induced EKC Hypothesis: Evidence from Top Ten Tourist Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Mmbaga, Nanzia F. & Kulindwa, Yusuph & Kazungu, Isaac, 2023. "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in East African Sub-Region: Interactive Dynamics of Human Capital," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 11(5), December.
    3. Muryani Muryani & Khoirun Nisa’ & Miguel Angel Esquivias & Siti Hafsah Zulkarnain, 2023. "Strategies to Control Industrial Emissions: An Analytical Network Process Approach in East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Rabab Triki & Bassem Kahouli & Kais Tissaoui & Haykel Tlili, 2023. "Assessing the Link between Environmental Quality, Green Finance, Health Expenditure, Renewable Energy, and Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Abdul Rahim Ridzuan & Bayu Arie Fianto & Miguel Angel Esquivias & Vikniswari Vija Kumaran & Mohd Shahidan Shaari & Aliashim Albani, 2022. "Do Financial Development and Trade Liberalization Influence Environmental Quality in Indonesia? Evidence-based on ARDL Model," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 342-351, September.
    6. Sahoo, Malayaranjan & Sethi, Narayan & Angel Esquivias Padilla, Miguel, 2023. "Unpacking the dynamics of information and communication technology, control of corruption and sustainability in green development in developing economies: New evidence," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    7. Tobechukwu Eleogu & Franciscamary Okonkwo & Rosita Eberechukwu Daraojimba & Bukola A. Odulaja & Damilola Emmanuel Ogedengbe & Chioma Ann Udeh, 2024. "Revolutionizing Renewable Energy Workforce Dynamics: HR’s Role in Shaping the Future," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(12), pages 402-422, January.
    8. Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur & Alam, Khosrul, 2022. "Effects of corruption, technological innovation, globalisation, and renewable energy on carbon emissions in Asian countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Xianpu Xu & Bijiao Yi, 2022. "New Insights into the Impact of Local Corruption on China’s Regional Carbon Emissions Performance Based on the Spatial Spillover Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Chen, Hongrui, 2023. "Energy innovations, natural resource abundance, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in the post-covid era. Does environmental regulation matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    11. Abdul Rahim Ridzuan & Vikniswari Vija Kumaran & Bayu Arie Fianto & Mohd Shahidan Shaari & Miguel Angel Esquivias & Aliashim Albani, 2022. "Reinvestigating the Presence of Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: The Role of Foreign Direct Investment," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 217-225, September.
    12. Yingqi Xu & Yu Cheng & Ruijing Zheng & Yaping Wang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission Efficiency in the Yellow River Basin of China: Comparative Analysis of Resource and Non-Resource-Based Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Rifat Nahrin & Md. Hasanur Rahman & Shapan Chandra Majumder & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2023. "Economic Growth and Pollution Nexus in Mexico, Colombia, and Venezuela (G-3 Countries): The Role of Renewable Energy in Carbon Dioxide Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Sun, Yanlei & Wang, Siyao & Xing, Zhanlei, 2023. "Do international trade diversification, intellectual capital, and renewable energy transition ensure effective natural resources management in BRICST region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    15. Mengzhi Xu & Jixia Li & Zeyu Ping & Qianming Zhang & Tengfei Liu & Can Zhang & Huachun Wang, 2022. "Can Local Government’s Attention Allocated to Green Innovation Improve the Green Innovation Efficiency?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:231-:d:1337826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.