IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i2p168-d1330531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Land De-Urbanization in Metropolises: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaochun Chen

    (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Natural Resources for Natural Resources Monitoring in Tropical Subtropics of South China, School of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Yongni Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Natural Resources for Natural Resources Monitoring in Tropical Subtropics of South China, School of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Hanbing Zhao

    (Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Land Information Technology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Jinhao Zhou

    (Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Land Information Technology, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Yilun Liu

    (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Natural Resources for Natural Resources Monitoring in Tropical Subtropics of South China, School of Public Administration, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

Abstract

With a series of redevelopment activities, such as land consolidation and urban renewal, many cities in China have experienced land de-urbanization phenomena. These include the conversion of construction land into green spaces (such as parks, forests, and lawns), blue spaces (such as rivers, lakes, and wetlands), and farmland. However, there is currently limited research on diverse land de-urbanization types and pathways. This study focuses on investigating the land de-urbanization in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) from 2014 to September 2023 using the Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) method. The results demonstrate that the GBA experienced 72.74 square kilometers of de-urbanization during the study period, primarily through the conversion of construction land to land with low plant coverage, including grassland and farmland. There were significant differences in the quantity and spatial agglomeration of de-urbanization between cities and within individual cities. Temporally, de-urbanization predominantly occurred in the period of 2016 to 2021, with a sharp decline in 2022. The temporal changes were significantly influenced by urban renewal policies and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In terms of spatial clustering characteristics, the de-urbanization process in the GBA exhibited spatial agglomeration but was primarily characterized by low-level clustering. This study also examines the correlations between de-urbanization and factors including location and the stage of urbanization. The analysis showed that de-urbanization within cities tended to concentrate near the main urban roads within a range of 10–30 km from city centers. The trend of de-urbanization followed a pattern that is consistent with the Northam curve, where de-urbanization tends to increase during the rapid urbanization phase and decline as urbanization reaches a mature stage. Overall, this study provides valuable insights for the redevelopment of construction land within the context of ecological civilization construction. It also offers suggestions for urban land development and redevelopment in metropolitan areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaochun Chen & Yongni Zhou & Hanbing Zhao & Jinhao Zhou & Yilun Liu, 2024. "The Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Land De-Urbanization in Metropolises: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:168-:d:1330531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/168/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/2/168/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krekel, Christian & Kolbe, Jens & Wüstemann, Henry, 2016. "The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 117-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew E. Clark, 2018. "Four Decades of the Economics of Happiness: Where Next?," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 64(2), pages 245-269, June.
    2. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Tyurina, Elena & Nagapetyan, Artur, 2022. "The economic value of the Glass Beach: Contingent valuation and life satisfaction approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Huali Tong, 2022. "Research on Construction Land Use Benefit and the Coupling Coordination Relationship Based on a Three-Dimensional Frame Model—A Case Study in the Lanzhou-Xining Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Thanasis Ziogas & Dimitris Ballas & Sierdjan Koster & Arjen Edzes, 2020. "How happy are my neighbours? Modelling spatial spillover effects of well-being," Papers 2007.11580, arXiv.org.
    5. Krekel, Christian & Rechlitz, Julia & Rode, Johannes & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2020. "Quantifying the Externalities of Renewable Energy Plants Using Wellbeing Data: The Case of Biogas," IZA Discussion Papers 13959, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Pietro Battistoni & Marco Romano & Monica Sebillo & Giuliana Vitiello, 2023. "Monitoring Urban Happiness through Interactive Chorems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Jingjing Luo & Shiyan Zhai & Genxin Song & Xinxin He & Hongquan Song & Jing Chen & Huan Liu & Yuke Feng, 2022. "Assessing Inequity in Green Space Exposure toward a “15-Minute City” in Zhengzhou, China: Using Deep Learning and Urban Big Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Xinhai Lu & Zhenxing Shi & Jia Li & Junhao Dong & Mingjie Song & Jiao Hou, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Factor Flow on Urban Land Use Efficiency from the Perspective of Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Julia Rehling & Christiane Bunge & Julia Waldhauer & André Conrad, 2021. "Socioeconomic Differences in Walking Time of Children and Adolescents to Public Green Spaces in Urban Areas—Results of the German Environmental Survey (2014–2017)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    10. Dolan, Paul & Kavetsos, Georgios & Krekel, Christian & Mavridis, Dimitris & Metcalfe, Robert & Senik, Claudia & Szymanski, Stefan & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2019. "Quantifying the intangible impact of the Olympics using subjective well-being data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Knight, S.J; Howley, P.;, 2017. "Can clean air make you happy? Examining the effect of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) on life satisfaction," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 17/08, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    12. Min Jee Nikki Han & Mi Jeong Kim, 2019. "Green Environments and Happiness Level in Housing Areas toward a Sustainable Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Claudio Othón Cruz Martínez, 2016. "Una aproximación al valor social y ambiental de las áreas verdes urbanas de la Ciudad de México," Graduate theses (Spanish) TESG 011, CIDE, División de Economía.
    14. Christine Bertram & Jan Goebel & Christian Krekel & Katrin Rehdanz, 2022. "Urban Land Use Fragmentation and Human Well-Being," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(2), pages 399-420.
    15. Pereira, Mauro F. & Vale, David S. & Santana, Paula, 2023. "Is walkability equitably distributed across socio-economic groups? – A spatial analysis for Lisbon metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Takuya Takahashi & Yukiko Uchida & Hiroyuki Ishibashi & Noboru Okuda, 2021. "Subjective Well-Being as a Potential Policy Indicator in the Context of Urbanization and Forest Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Libera Amenta & Arjan Van Timmeren, 2018. "Beyond Wastescapes: Towards Circular Landscapes. Addressing the Spatial Dimension of Circularity through the Regeneration of Wastescapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Johnson, Daniel & Geisendorf, Sylvie, 2019. "Are Neighborhood-level SUDS Worth it? An Assessment of the Economic Value of Sustainable Urban Drainage System Scenarios Using Cost-Benefit Analyses," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 194-205.
    19. Yang Zhang & Agnes E. Van den Berg & Terry Van Dijk & Gerd Weitkamp, 2017. "Quality over Quantity: Contribution of Urban Green Space to Neighborhood Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Ben Ma & Tiantian Zhou & Shuo Lei & Yali Wen & Theint Theint Htun, 2019. "Effects of urban green spaces on residents’ well-being," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 2793-2809, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:168-:d:1330531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.