IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2234-d1548597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying the Optimal Scenario for Reducing Land-Use Conflicts in Regional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Weihua Liao

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    China-ASEAN Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Development, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xingwang Hu

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Zhu Huang

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Meixin Wei

    (School of Public Policy and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

Land-use conflicts are inherent challenges in regional development and have social, economic, and ecological impacts. To mitigate these conflicts, multi-scenario simulations can help identify the most effective scenario with minimal land-use conflicts. However, previous studies often neglected the influence of regional policies on these optimal scenarios. This paper addresses this gap by developing a framework to explore strategies for reducing land-use conflicts using Hechi city in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, as a case study. In this study, the conflict risk is assessed based on the landscape pattern index, and the ecological benefit is assessed based on the ecosystem service value, and the ‘conflict risk–ecological benefit’ assessment method is constructed, focusing on the land-use conflicts in areas where the conflict risk increases and the ecological benefit decreases, and evaluating whether there is a best solution to alleviate these conflicts. The findings reveal that from 2000 to 2020, the area experiencing land-use conflicts in Hechi city increased. The geographic focus of these conflicts has shifted, first moving to the southeast, then to the northwest, and finally returning to the southeast. The overall center of conflict has moved toward the developed areas in the southeast. Among the three future development scenarios (economic lead, ecological priority, and historical signs), the ecological priority scenario, which includes the green development pilot area policy, offers the most significant reduction in land-use conflicts. Under this scenario, the proportion of conflict areas relative to the total area is the smallest at 5.39% in 2025 and 7.92% in 2030. Additionally, the percentage of high-level conflict areas decreases notably from 2.17% in 2025 to 1.12% in 2030. Consequently, this scenario with an ecological priority emerges as the most favorable for Hechi city’s future development. The framework of alleviating land-use conflicts proposed in this study can be used for reference by other ecological resources areas experiencing rapid urbanization.

Suggested Citation

  • Weihua Liao & Xingwang Hu & Zhu Huang & Meixin Wei, 2024. "Identifying the Optimal Scenario for Reducing Land-Use Conflicts in Regional Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2234-:d:1548597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2234/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2234/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bin Wang & Wenzhong Shi & Zelang Miao, 2015. "Confidence Analysis of Standard Deviational Ellipse and Its Extension into Higher Dimensional Euclidean Space," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Xingwang Hu & Weihua Liao & Yifang Wei & Zhiyan Wei & Shengxia Huang, 2024. "Analysis of Land Use Change and Its Economic and Ecological Value under the Optimal Scenario and Green Development Advancement Policy: A Case Study of Hechi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Stuart L. Pimm & Peter Raven, 2000. "Extinction by numbers," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6772), pages 843-845, February.
    4. Furui Xi & Runping Wang & Jusong Shi & Jinde Zhang & Yang Yu & Na Wang & Zhiyi Wang, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Conflict Identification of Production–Living–Ecological Space in the Yellow River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Qiang Ren & Chunyang He & Qingxu Huang & Peijun Shi & Da Zhang & Burak Güneralp, 2022. "Impacts of urban expansion on natural habitats in global drylands," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 5(10), pages 869-878, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fei Tao & Guoan Tang & Yihao Wu & Tong Zhou, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and Driving Mechanism of Co-Ordinated Urban Development: A Case Study of the Central Area of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Christopher Jeffords, 2014. "Preference-directed regulation when ethical environmental policy choices are formed with limited information," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 573-606, March.
    3. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    5. Liang Zheng & Yajing Wang & Hui Yang & Yuzhe Bi & Lei Xu & Ying Wang, 2024. "Identifying Trade-Offs and Synergies of Production–Living–Ecological Functions and Their Drivers: The Case of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    6. Don Driscoll & Adam Felton & Philip Gibbons & Annika Felton & Nicola Munro & David Lindenmayer, 2012. "Priorities in policy and management when existing biodiversity stressors interact with climate-change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 533-557, April.
    7. Jiafeng Gu, 2024. "The impacts of the low-carbon city policy on urban air pollution in China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(5), pages 2431-2450, August.
    8. Ramiadantsoa, Tanjona & Hanski, Ilkka & Ovaskainen, Otso, 2018. "Responses of generalist and specialist species to fragmented landscapes," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 31-40.
    9. Omid Bozorg-Haddad & Mahdi Bahrami & Ayda Gholami & Xuefeng Chu & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2024. "Investigation and classification of water resources management strategies: possible threats and solutions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 120(11), pages 9867-9892, September.
    10. Furui Xi & Gang Lin & Yanan Zhao & Xiang Li & Zhiyu Chen & Chenglong Cao, 2023. "Land Use Optimization and Carbon Storage Estimation in the Yellow River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Junnan Xiong & Chongchong Ye & Weiming Cheng & Liang Guo & Chenghu Zhou & Xiaolei Zhang, 2019. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution of Flash Floods and Analysis of Partition Driving Forces in Yunnan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Roshan Sharma & Udo Nehren & Syed Ajijur Rahman & Maximilian Meyer & Bhagawat Rimal & Gilang Aria Seta & Himlal Baral, 2018. "Modeling Land Use and Land Cover Changes and Their Effects on Biodiversity in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, May.
    13. CHEN, Running & PENG, Yisong & REN, Qiang & WU, Jiayu, 2025. "Optimizing global protected areas to address future land use threats to biodiversity," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Elżbieta Antczak, 2018. "Building W Matrices Using Selected Geostatistical Tools: Empirical Examination and Application," Stats, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Fabio Ietto & Gaetano Pellicone & Nicola Cantasano, 2023. "Silting Process and Loss of Posidonia oceanica Meadows in the Tyrrhenian Waters of Calabria (Southern Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Jonathon J Valente & Lindsay J Adrean & S Kim Nelson & Matthew G Betts & Daniel D Roby & James W Rivers, 2024. "Presence-absence surveys yield spatially imprecise information about nesting sites of an endangered, forest-nesting seabird," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Lewis, David J., 2010. "An economic framework for forecasting land-use and ecosystem change," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 98-116, April.
    18. Cheng Tong & Yanhua Jin & Bangli Liang & Yang Ye & Haijun Bao, 2024. "A Comprehensive Framework for Monitoring and Providing Early Warning of Resource and Environmental Carrying Capacity Within the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Jinjin Fan & Yue Li & Wenquan Zhu & Yan Chen & Yao Li & Hao Hou & Tangao Hu, 2021. "Evaluating the Impact of Mega-Sports Events on Urbanization Focusing on Land-Use Changes Using a Scenario-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Xinwei Ma & Yanjie Ji & Yuchuan Jin & Jianbiao Wang & Mingjia He, 2018. "Modeling the Factors Influencing the Activity Spaces of Bikeshare around Metro Stations: A Spatial Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2234-:d:1548597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.