IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i12p2104-d1537421.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Urban Spatial Compactness on Carbon Emissions: Heterogeneity at the County Level in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area, China

Author

Listed:
  • Muhan Li

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Minghao Zuo

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Saiyi Chen

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Shuang Tang

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Tian Chen

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Jia Liu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
    School of Architecture, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

Abstract

Urban spatial compactness is crucial for reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable urban development. However, the potential of and variations in spatial compactness in county-level carbon reduction have been largely overlooked. Taking the county-level areas in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region as an example, after reviewing the dimensions, scales, and pathways of the existing research, we quantifies the spatial compactness from 2005 to 2015 in terms of density, morphology, and function. The results reveal that, firstly, BTH county-level areas’ carbon emissions, both per land area (CO 2 /L) and per capita (CO 2 /P), have generally risen. Heterogeneity varied across spatial compactness indicators: urban density and functional compactness increased, while morphological compactness showed a minor fluctuation. Second, the correlations with CO 2 /L were stronger than those with CO 2 /P, ranking from urban density, functional compactness > morphological compactness. Additionally, the geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) model revealed the spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the impact of spatial compactness on carbon emission intensity. The heterogeneity results provide insights into the mechanisms and general patterns of the differences in the factors influencing carbon emissions in four different types of county-level areas, namely, central, eastern, southern, and northwestern, offering policy guidance to promote the reductions in both CO 2 /L and CO 2 /P. This study is helpful for proposing urban spatial planning strategies for carbon reduction and formulating differentiated carbon reduction policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhan Li & Minghao Zuo & Saiyi Chen & Shuang Tang & Tian Chen & Jia Liu, 2024. "Impact of Urban Spatial Compactness on Carbon Emissions: Heterogeneity at the County Level in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2104-:d:1537421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2104/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/12/2104/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jared R. VandeWeghe & Christopher Kennedy, 2007. "A Spatial Analysis of Residential Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(2), pages 133-144, April.
    2. Yanyi Zhu & Youpei Hu, 2023. "The Correlation between Urban Form and Carbon Emissions: A Bibliometric and Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Michiel Gerritse & Daniel Arribas-Bel, 2018. "Concrete agglomeration benefits: do roads improve urban connections or just attract more people?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(8), pages 1134-1149, August.
    4. Jinming Yang & Shimei Li & Huicui Lu, 2019. "Quantitative Influence of Land-Use Changes and Urban Expansion Intensity on Landscape Pattern in Qingdao, China: Implications for Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jukka Heinonen & Antti-Juhani Säynäjoki & Matti Kuronen & Seppo Junnila, 2012. "Are the Greenhouse Gas Implications of New Residential Developments Understood Wrongly?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Hanwen Zhang & Yanqing Lang, 2022. "Quantifying and Analyzing the Responses of Habitat Quality to Land Use Change in Guangdong Province, China over the Past 40 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Hankey, Steve & Marshall, Julian D., 2010. "Impacts of urban form on future US passenger-vehicle greenhouse gas emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 4880-4887, September.
    4. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2019. "Dirty density: air quality and the density of American cities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 103393, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Wilson, Jeffrey & Spinney, Jamie & Millward, Hugh & Scott, Darren & Hayden, Anders & Tyedmers, Peter, 2013. "Blame the exurbs, not the suburbs: Exploring the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions within a city region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1329-1335.
    6. Dan Yan & Shaoxuan Huang & Guoliang Chen & Huan Tong & Peiyuan Qin, 2025. "Heterogeneous influences of urban compactness on air pollution: evidence from 285 prefecture-level cities in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Yanyi Zhu & Youpei Hu, 2023. "The Correlation between Urban Form and Carbon Emissions: A Bibliometric and Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Tzu-Ling Chen & Hao-Wei Chiu & Yu-Fang Lin, 2020. "How do East and Southeast Asian Cities Differ from Western Cities? A Systematic Review of the Urban Form Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2020. "Dirty Density: Air Quality and the Density of American Cities," IZA Discussion Papers 13191, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Cuce, Pinar Mert & Riffat, Saffa, 2015. "A comprehensive review of heat recovery systems for building applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 665-682.
    11. Salon, Deborah & Sperling, Dan & Meier, Alan & Murphy, Sinnott & Gorham, Roger & Barrett, James, 2008. "City carbon budgets: Aligning incentives for climate-friendly communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0hp71320, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Ivan Muñiz & Andrés Dominguez, 2020. "The Impact of Urban Form and Spatial Structure on per Capita Carbon Footprint in U.S. Larger Metropolitan Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Yu Li & Haipeng Ye & Xu Sun & Ji Zheng & Dan Meng, 2021. "Coupling Analysis of the Thermal Landscape and Environmental Carrying Capacity of Urban Expansion in Beijing (China) over the Past 35 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Hadj Ali, Célia & Roy, Damien & Amireche, Louisa & Antoni, Jean-Philipe, 2023. "Development of a Cellular Automata-based model approach for sustainable planning of affordable housing projects: an application case study in Algiers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    15. Shengjun Zhu & Chong Wang & Canfei He, 2019. "High-speed Rail Network and Changing Industrial Dynamics in Chinese Regions," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 42(5-6), pages 495-518, September.
    16. Cai, Bofeng & Zhang, Lixiao, 2014. "Urban CO2 emissions in China: Spatial boundary and performance comparison," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 557-567.
    17. Devajyoti Deka & Thomas Marchwinski, 2014. "The revenue and environmental benefits of new off-peak commuter rail service: the case of the Pascack Valley line in New Jersey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 157-172, January.
    18. Yuyao Ye & Changjian Wang & Yuling Zhang & Kangmin Wu & Qitao Wu & Yongxian Su, 2017. "Low-Carbon Transportation Oriented Urban Spatial Structure: Theory, Model and Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Salon, Deborah & Sperling, Dan & Meier, Alan & Murphy, Sinnott & Gorham, Roger & Barrett, James, 2008. "City carbon budgets: Aligning incentives for climate-friendly communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt4c07z5nq, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    20. Piotr Gibas & Agnieszka Majorek, 2020. "Analysis of Land-Use Change between 2012–2018 in Europe in Terms of Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:12:p:2104-:d:1537421. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.