IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v13y2024i11p1734-d1504700.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Factors of the Digital Economy and High-Quality Development of Rural Tourism: Insights from Chinese Experience Data

Author

Listed:
  • Hanni Liu

    (College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Zhixiong Tan

    (School of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Zancai Xia

    (College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

Abstract

Globally, rural tourism development faces challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, insufficient marketing resources, and unreliable service quality, all of which limit its potential. However, digital technology offers unprecedented opportunities to address these barriers. China’s experience in integrating digital technology into rural tourism provides a valuable case study for understanding the digitalization of rural tourism. This study constructs an index system to assess the coupling coordination relationship between the digital economy and the high-quality development of rural tourism (HQDRT). By employing methods such as the entropy method, coupling coordination degree model, obstacle factor model, and geographic detector, the study examines the evolution of this coupling coordination relationship and its driving mechanisms across 31 provinces (including regions and municipalities) in China from 2012 to 2021. The findings reveal that (1) The development of the digital economy generally lags behind that of the rural tourism, but the coupling coordination relationship between the two is steadily improving. (2) The level of coupling coordination increases from west to east, with spatial distribution patterns evolving from ‘antagonism’ to ‘adaptation’ and then to ‘coordination’ as they move eastward. Most provinces belong to the ‘adaptation’ type. (3) From a nationwide perspective, the primary obstacles impeding the development of the digital economy include an insufficient internet penetration rate, which consequently leads to underdeveloped internet finance development and telecommunications industry development. The major barriers to the HQDRT stem from an inadequate number of tourists and a lack of physical infrastructure. (4) Population density, consumer spending, and R&D are significant drivers of the coupling coordination relationship, with the interaction between urbanization rates and other factors generally weakening the degree of coupling.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanni Liu & Zhixiong Tan & Zancai Xia, 2024. "The Coupling Coordination Relationship and Driving Factors of the Digital Economy and High-Quality Development of Rural Tourism: Insights from Chinese Experience Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1734-:d:1504700
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/13/11/1734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alice Wanner & Ulrike Pröbstl-Haider, 2019. "Barriers to Stakeholder Involvement in Sustainable Rural Tourism Development—Experiences from Southeast Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Wookhyun An & Silverio Alarcón, 2020. "How Can Rural Tourism Be Sustainable? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Tolkach, Denis & King, Brian, 2015. "Strengthening Community-Based Tourism in a new resource-based island nation: Why and how?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 386-398.
    4. Kurtyka Marcak, Izabela & Janowska-Biernat, Justyna, 2020. "Opportunities and Barriers to the Development of Tourism in Rural Areas," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2020(3).
    5. Devesa, María & Laguna, Marta & Palacios, Andrés, 2010. "The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: Empirical evidence in rural tourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 547-552.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanan Li & Muhammad Azzam Ismail & Asrul Aminuddin & Rui Wang & Kaiyun Jiang & Haowei Yu, 2025. "The Lost View: Villager-Centered Scale Development and Validation Due to Rural Tourism for Traditional Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Chen, Chun-Chu & Huang, Wei-Jue & Petrick, James F., 2016. "Holiday recovery experiences, tourism satisfaction and life satisfaction – Is there a relationship?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 140-147.
    3. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison, 2023. "Applying a Combination of SEM and fsQCA to Predict Tourist Resource-Saving Behavioral Intentions in Rural Tourism: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Sylwia Barwicka & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "The “Perfect Village” Model as a Result of Research on Transformation of Plant Cover—Case Study of the Puchaczów Commune," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    5. María Redondo-Carretero & Carmen Camarero-Izquierdo & Ana Gutiérrez-Arranz & Javier Rodríguez-Pinto, 2017. "Language tourism destinations: a case study of motivations, perceived value and tourists’ expenditure," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(2), pages 155-172, May.
    6. Torres-Sovero, Claudia & González, José A. & Martín-López, Berta & Kirkby, Christopher A., 2012. "Social–ecological factors influencing tourist satisfaction in three ecotourism lodges in the southeastern Peruvian Amazon," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 545-552.
    7. Fernández Guzmán Antonio Muñoz & Pérez-Gálvez Jesús Claudio & López-Guzmán Tomás, 2016. "Tourist motivations in a heritage destination in Spain," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 7(3), pages 226-235, December.
    8. Lin Ma & Gil Shapira & Damien de Walque & Quy‐Toan Do & Jed Friedman & Andrei A. Levchenko, 2022. "The Intergenerational Mortality Trade‐Off Of Covid‐19 Lockdown Policies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(3), pages 1427-1468, August.
    9. Emmet McLoughlin & Kelly Maguire & James Hanrahan, 2023. "Barriers to Evidence-Based Sustainable Planning for Tourism: Perspectives from Ireland’s Local Authorities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Carolina Aldao & Tanja A. Mihalic, 2020. "New Frontiers in Travel Motivation and Social Media: The Case of Longyearbyen, the High Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Jaffar Aman & Jaffar Abbas & Shahid Mahmood & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Shaher Bano, 2019. "The Influence of Islamic Religiosity on the Perceived Socio-Cultural Impact of Sustainable Tourism Development in Pakistan: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-27, May.
    12. Qiuli Meng & Chaoju Wang & Tao Xu & Hongwen Pi & Yazhou Wei, 2022. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Development of Traditional Ethnic Village Tourist Destinations: A Case Study of Jiaju Tibetan Village in Danba County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    13. Kuo-Yan Wang, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism Development Based upon Visitors’ Brand Trust: A Case of “100 Religious Attractions”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    14. Yun Wang & Chih-Chiang Wang, 2022. "How Climbers’ Sensation of Recreation Impact and Recreation Experience Affect Their Environmental Attitudes and Environmentally Responsible Behaviors: A Case of Jiaming Lake National Trail," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Katharina Klug & Jörg Felfe & Annika Krick, 2022. "Does Self-Care Make You a Better Leader? A Multisource Study Linking Leader Self-Care to Health-Oriented Leadership, Employee Self-Care, and Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Tangeland, Torvald & Vennesland, Birger & Nybakk, Erlend, 2013. "Second-home owners' intention to purchase nature-based tourism activity products – A Norwegian case study," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 364-376.
    17. Sieds, 2012. "Complete Volume LXVI nn.3-4 2012," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 66(3-4), pages 1-166.
    18. Violah Mpangwire & Sarah Ainomugisha & Benjamin Musiita, 2024. "Stakeholder Involvement and Team Capacity on the Performance of Rural Electrification Projects in Southwestern Uganda," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 16(1), pages 109-117.
    19. Gajić Tamara & Petrović Marko D. & Radovanović Milan M. & Tretiakova Tatiana N. & Syromiatnikova Julia A., 2020. "Possibilities of Turning Passive Rural Areas into Tourist Attractions Through Attained Service Quality," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 179-192, June.
    20. Ge Wang & Liman Huang & Changliang Xu & Kai He & Kang Shen & Peiyu Liang, 2022. "Analysis of the Mediating Role of Place Attachment in the Link between Tourists’ Authentic Experiences of, Involvement in, and Loyalty to Rural Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:13:y:2024:i:11:p:1734-:d:1504700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.