IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p490-d1070395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Duarte

    (Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra (INESC Coimbra), DEEC, University of Coimbra, Polo 2, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Cidália Fonte

    (Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra (INESC Coimbra), DEEC, University of Coimbra, Polo 2, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal
    Department of Mathematics, University of Coimbra, Apartado 3008, EC Santa Cruz, 3001-501 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Hugo Costa

    (Direção-Geral do Território, Rua da Artilharia Um, 107, 1099-052 Lisbon, Portugal
    NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Campus de Campolide, Nova University Lisbon, 1070-312 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Mário Caetano

    (Direção-Geral do Território, Rua da Artilharia Um, 107, 1099-052 Lisbon, Portugal
    NOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Campus de Campolide, Nova University Lisbon, 1070-312 Lisbon, Portugal)

Abstract

This work presents a comparison between a global and a national land cover map, namely the ESA WorldCover 2020 (WC20) and the Portuguese use/land cover map (Carta de Uso e Ocupação do Solo 2018) (COS18). Such a comparison is relevant given the current amount of publicly available LULC products (either national or global) where such comparative studies enable a better understanding regarding different sets of LULC information and their production, focus and characteristics, especially when comparing authoritative maps built by national mapping agencies and global land cover focused products. Moreover, this comparison is also aimed at complementing the global validation report released with the WC20 product, which focused on global and continental level accuracy assessments, with no additional information for specific countries. The maps were compared by following a framework composed by four steps: (1) class nomenclature harmonization, (2) computing cross-tabulation matrices between WC20 and the Portuguese map, (3) determining the area occupied by each harmonized class in each data source, and (4) visual comparison between the maps to illustrate their differences focusing on Portuguese landscape details. Some of the differences were due to the different minimum mapping unit ofCOS18 and WC20, different nomenclatures and focuses on either land use or land cover. Overall, the results show that while WC20 detail is able to distinguish small occurrences of artificial surfaces and grasslands within an urban environment, WC20 is often not able to distinguish sparse/individual trees from the neighboring cover, which is a common occurrence in the Portuguese landscape. While selecting a map, users should be aware that differences between maps can have a range of causes, such as scale, temporal reference, nomenclature and errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Duarte & Cidália Fonte & Hugo Costa & Mário Caetano, 2023. "Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:490-:d:1070395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen Jun & Yifang Ban & Songnian Li, 2014. "Open access to Earth land-cover map," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7523), pages 434-434, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tesfamariam Engida Mengesha & Lulseged Tamene Desta & Paolo Gamba & Getachew Tesfaye Ayehu, 2024. "Multi-Temporal Passive and Active Remote Sensing for Agricultural Mapping and Acreage Estimation in Context of Small Farm Holds in Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qianning Zhang & Zhu Xu, 2021. "Fully Portraying Patch Area Scaling with Resolution: An Analytics and Descriptive Statistics-Combined Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Hao Wang & Huimin Yan & Yunfeng Hu & Yue Xi & Yichen Yang, 2022. "Consistency and Accuracy of Four High-Resolution LULC Datasets—Indochina Peninsula Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Jingyi Wang & Chen Weng & Zhen Wang & Chunming Li & Tingting Wang, 2022. "What Constitutes the High-Quality Soundscape in Human Habitats? Utilizing a Random Forest Model to Explore Soundscape and Its Geospatial Factors Behind," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Qing Yang & Zhanqiang Chang & Chou Xie & Chaoyong Shen & Bangsen Tian & Haoran Fang & Yihong Guo & Yu Zhu & Daoqin Zhou & Xin Yao & Guanwen Chen & Tao Xie, 2023. "Combining Soil Moisture and MT-InSAR Data to Evaluate Regional Landslide Susceptibility in Weining, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    5. Gang Lin & Dong Jiang & Xiang Li & Jingying Fu, 2022. "Accounting for Carbon Sink and Its Dominant Influencing Factors in Chinese Ecological Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Hao Wang & Yunfeng Hu, 2021. "Simulation of Biocapacity and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Analysis of Loess Plateau in Northern Shaanxi Based on the CA–Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Mu Li & Lingli Zhang & Yuanyuan Chen & Shuangliang Liu & Mingyao Cai & Qiangqiang Sun, 2024. "Construction of Landscape Ecological Risk Collaborative Management Network in Mountainous Cities—A Case Study of Zhangjiakou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Yunchen Wang & Boyan Li, 2022. "The Spatial Disparities of Land-Use Efficiency in Mainland China from 2000 to 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Zhang, Shaoyao & Deng, Wei & Zhang, Hao & Wang, Zhanyun, 2023. "Identification and analysis of transitional zone patterns along urban-rural-natural landscape gradients: An application to China’s southwest mountains," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Chaoqing Huang & Chao He & Qian Wu & MinhThu Nguyen & Song Hong, 2023. "Classification of the Land Cover of a Megacity in ASEAN Using Two Band Combinations and Three Machine Learning Algorithms: A Case Study in Ho Chi Minh City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Wei Guo & Yongjia Teng & Yueguan Yan & Chuanwu Zhao & Wanqiu Zhang & Xianglin Ji, 2022. "Simulation of Land Use and Carbon Storage Evolution in Multi-Scenario: A Case Study in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Ziqian Kang & Shuo Wang & Ling Xu & Fenglin Yang & Shushen Zhang, 2021. "Suitability assessment of urban land use in Dalian, China using PNN and GIS," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 913-936, March.
    13. Myroslava Lesiv & Anatoly Shvidenko & Dmitry Schepaschenko & Linda See & Steffen Fritz, 2019. "A spatial assessment of the forest carbon budget for Ukraine," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 985-1006, August.
    14. Feng Zhang & Xiasong Hu & Jing Zhang & Chengyi Li & Yupeng Zhang & Xilai Li, 2022. "Change in Alpine Grassland NPP in Response to Climate Variation and Human Activities in the Yellow River Source Zone from 2000 to 2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    15. Baifei Ren & Keunhyun Park & Anil Shrestha & Jun Yang & Melissa McHale & Weilan Bai & Guangyu Wang, 2022. "Impact of Human Disturbances on the Spatial Heterogeneity of Landscape Fragmentation in Qilian Mountain National Park, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Dongchuan Wang & Hua Chai & Zhiheng Wang & Kangjian Wang & Hongyi Wang & Hui Long & Jianshe Gao & Aoze Wei & Sirun Wang, 2022. "Dynamic Monitoring and Ecological Risk Analysis of Lake Inundation Areas in Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Zhibo Lu & Qian Song & Jianyun Zhao, 2023. "Evolution of Landscape Ecological Risk and Identification of Critical Areas in the Yellow River Source Area Based on LUCC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    18. Xuebin Zhang & Litang Yao & Jun Luo & Wenjuan Liang, 2022. "Exploring Changes in Land Use and Landscape Ecological Risk in Key Regions of the Belt and Road Initiative Countries," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Lei Wang & Aifeng Lv, 2022. "Identification and Diagnosis of Transboundary River Basin Water Management in China and Neighboring Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    20. Yaoping Cui & Xinliang Xu & Jinwei Dong & Yaochen Qin, 2016. "Influence of Urbanization Factors on Surface Urban Heat Island Intensity: A Comparison of Countries at Different Developmental Phases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:490-:d:1070395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.