IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2022i1p38-d1012308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Visioning for Landscape-Based Spatial Planning—Experiences from Two Regional Cases in The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Ilse Voskamp

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Wim Timmermans

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Onno Roosenschoon

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Remco Kranendonk

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Sabine van Rooij

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Tim van Hattum

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Marjolein Sterk

    (Department Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Bas Pedroli

    (Land Use Planning Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Normative scenarios for long-term (e.g., 100 years) landscape development can be very inspiring to imagine outside the box landscape futures, without being obliged to define concrete policy objectives for the shorter term. However, it remains challenging to translate such long-term visions into clear transition pathways. We draw upon a landscape-based design approach to local spatial planning to foster a transition to a well-functioning landscape, resilient to various external pressures. Inspired by a national visioning exercise for the Netherlands in 2120, two local case studies at municipal level in the Netherlands are analysed, aiming to identify in what ways the setup of a regional landscape-based design study using future visions can optimise the spatial planning process. Therefore, this comparative case study analysed the cases on the landscape-based approach, the design process, and the future visions formulated. The comparison shows that fostering abiotic differences safeguards sustainable and resilient landscapes; moreover, co-creation relying on representative local actors appears fundamental for shared solutions, while a landscape-based approach guarantees transitions to adaptive and biodiverse landscapes. We conclude that a shared long-term future landscape vision is a crucial source of inspiration to solve today’s spatial planning problems. The constellation of the stakeholder group involved and the methodological setup of a visioning process are determinative for the way a long-term vision is suited to informing spatial planning for a sustainable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilse Voskamp & Wim Timmermans & Onno Roosenschoon & Remco Kranendonk & Sabine van Rooij & Tim van Hattum & Marjolein Sterk & Bas Pedroli, 2022. "Long-Term Visioning for Landscape-Based Spatial Planning—Experiences from Two Regional Cases in The Netherlands," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:38-:d:1012308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/1/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott, John C., 2016. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 523-524, September.
    2. Mark Scott & Mick Lennon & Dagmar Haase & Aleksandra Kazmierczak & Gerry Clabby & Tim Beatley, 2016. "Nature-based solutions for the contemporary city/Re-naturing the city/Reflections on urban landscapes, ecosystems services and nature-based solutions in cities/Multifunctional green infrastructure and," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 267-300, April.
    3. Paul Opdam & Eveliene Steingröver, 2018. "How Could Companies Engage in Sustainable Landscape Management? An Exploratory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Rob Swart & Wim Timmermans & Jos Jonkhof & Hasse Goosen, 2021. "From Urban Façade to Green Foundation: Re-Imagining the Garden City to Manage Climate Risks," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 4-8.
    5. Scott, John C., 2016. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 217-218, June.
    6. Saskia Keesstra & Tamara Metze & Linda Ofori & Marleen Buizer & Saskia Visser, 2022. "What Does the Circular Household of the Future Look Like? An Expert-Based Exploration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Willem K. Korthals Altes, 2016. "Planning reform beyond planning: the debate on an integrated Environment and Planning Act in the Netherlands," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 420-434, August.
    8. Montanarella, Luca & Panagos, Panos, 2021. "The relevance of sustainable soil management within the European Green Deal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Scott, John C., 2016. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-2, March.
    10. Saskia Visser & Saskia Keesstra & Gilbert Maas & Margot de Cleen & Co Molenaar, 2019. "Soil as a Basis to Create Enabling Conditions for Transitions Towards Sustainable Land Management as a Key to Achieve the SDGs by 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rocío Losada-Iglesias & Emilio R. Díaz-Varela & Wim Timmermans & David Miranda, 2025. "Analysis of Strategic Green Infrastructure Planning Guided by Actors’ Perceptions: Insights at the Regional Level in the Netherlands and Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-26, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabine van Rooij & Wim Timmermans & Onno Roosenschoon & Saskia Keesstra & Marjolein Sterk & Bas Pedroli, 2020. "Landscape-Based Visions as Powerful Boundary Objects in Spatial Planning: Lessons from Three Dutch Projects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Olanrewaju J Ogunrinu & Keri N Norman & Javier Vinasco & Gizem Levent & Sara D Lawhon & Virginia R Fajt & Victoria V Volkova & Tara Gaire & Toni L Poole & Kenneth J Genovese & Thomas E Wittum & H Morg, 2020. "Can the use of older-generation beta-lactam antibiotics in livestock production over-select for beta-lactamases of greatest consequence for human medicine? An in vitro experimental model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Danielle M. Davidov & Kelly K. Gurka & D. Leann Long & Carmen N. Burrell, 2023. "Comparison of Intimate Partner Violence and Correlates at Urgent Care Clinics and an Emergency Department in a Rural Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Saskia Keesstra & Jeroen Veraart & Jan Verhagen & Saskia Visser & Marit Kragt & Vincent Linderhof & Wilfred Appelman & Jolanda van den Berg & Ayodeji Deolu-Ajayi & Annemarie Groot, 2023. "Nature-Based Solutions as Building Blocks for the Transition towards Sustainable Climate-Resilient Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Saskia Keesstra & Tamara Metze & Linda Ofori & Marleen Buizer & Saskia Visser, 2022. "What Does the Circular Household of the Future Look Like? An Expert-Based Exploration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    6. Sergio Cappucci & Serena Nappi & Andrea Cappelli, 2022. "Green Public Areas and Urban Open Spaces Management: New GreenCAL Tool Algorithms and Circular Economy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Tomasz Jałowiec & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2021. "Analysis of the RES Potential in Accordance with the Energy Policy of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-33, September.
    8. Asghari, Shiva & Zeinalzadeh, Kamran & Kheirfam, Hossein & Habibzadeh Azar, Behnam, 2022. "The impact of cyanobacteria inoculation on soil hydraulic properties at the lab-scale experiment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    9. Marek Zieliński & Piotr Koza & Artur Łopatka, 2022. "Agriculture from Areas Facing Natural or Other Specific Constraints (ANCs) in Poland, Its Characteristics, Directions of Changes and Challenges in the Context of the European Green Deal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Daniela Bona & Andrea Cristoforetti & Roberto Zanzotti & Daniela Bertoldi & Nicole Dellai & Silvia Silvestri, 2022. "Matured Manure and Compost from the Organic Fraction of Solid Waste Digestate Application in Intensive Apple Orchards," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Simon R. Swaffield & Robert C. Corry & Paul Opdam & Wendy McWilliam & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "Connecting business with the agricultural landscape: business strategies for sustainable rural development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1357-1369, November.
    12. Grażyna Żukowska & Magdalena Myszura-Dymek & Szymon Roszkowski & Magdalena Olkiewicz, 2023. "Selected Properties of Soil-like Substrates Made from Mine Coal Waste and Their Effect on Plant Yields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Jonas Volungevicius & Kristina Amaleviciute-Volunge, 2023. "A Conceptual Approach to the Histosols Profile Morphology as a Risk Indicator in Assessing the Sustainability of Their Use and Impact on Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    14. Teresa Rodríguez-Espinosa & Jose Navarro-Pedreño & Ignacio Gómez Lucas & María Belén Almendro Candel & Ana Pérez Gimeno & Manuel Jordán Vidal & Iliana Papamichael & Antonis A. Zorpas, 2022. "Environmental Risk from Organic Residues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Barbara Breza-Boruta & Justyna Bauza-Kaszewska, 2023. "Effect of Microbial Preparation and Biomass Incorporation on Soil Biological and Chemical Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Stefan Krajewski & Jan Žukovskis & Dariusz Gozdowski & Marek Cieśliński & Elżbieta Wójcik-Gront, 2024. "Evaluating the Path to the European Commission’s Organic Agriculture Goal: A Multivariate Analysis of Changes in EU Countries (2004–2021) and Socio-Economic Relationships," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Razieh Zandieh & Javier Martinez & Johannes Flacke, 2019. "Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking and Inequalities in Neighbourhood Green Spaces Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Aldo Dal Prà & Francesca Ugolini & Martino Negri & Sara Bortolu & Pierpaolo Duce & Cristina Macci & Andrea Lombardo & Martina Benedetti & Giovanni Brajon & Lucia Guazzini & Stefano Casini & Sara Spagn, 2024. "Wool Agro-Waste Biomass and Spruce Sawdust: Pellets as an Organic Soil Amendment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Orestis Kairis & Chrysoula Aratzioglou & Athanasios Filis & Michel van Mol & Costas Kosmas, 2021. "The Effect of Land Management Practices on Soil Quality Indicators in Crete," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Jagoda Zmyślona & Arkadiusz Sadowski & Natalia Genstwa, 2023. "Plant Protection and Fertilizer Use Efficiency in Farms in a Context of Overinvestment: A Case Study from Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:38-:d:1012308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.