IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i9p1388-d896230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructed Wetland for Sustainable and Low-Cost Wastewater Treatment: Review Article

Author

Listed:
  • Marwa M. Waly

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Australian University, Kuwait City 13015, Kuwait)

  • Taha Ahmed

    (Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Australian University, Kuwait City 13015, Kuwait)

  • Ziyad Abunada

    (School of Engineering & Technology, Central Queensland University, 120 Spencer St., Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Slobodan B. Mickovski

    (School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK)

  • Craig Thomson

    (School of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK)

Abstract

There is a growing need for more sustainable wastewater treatment technologies to provide non-conventional water sources. Constructed Wetland systems (CW) are viewed as a low-cost treatment technology with proven treatment efficiency. CWS can treat a variety of contaminants using low energy and natural systems by altering various design parameters. There are two configuration types of constructed wetlands: vertical (VF) and horizontal flow CW (HF). Both configurations have been widely adopted in both large and pilot scale studies with proven records of reasonable wastewater treatment efficiency. The current article reviews the recent development of CW technology and highlights the main achievements and successful applications for wastewater treatment at various locations. The review has indicated that a considerable removal efficiency is attained while using engineered CW systems with variable treatment rates for various pollutants. The treatment efficiency is a function of various parameters including wastewater type, scale dimensions, applied plant and the retention time. The review compared the treatment efficiency for both VF and HF and has revealed that various removal rates of BOD, COD, TSS, TN, TP and NH₄ was attained using both configurations. Yet, the removal efficiency in the case of VF was slightly higher compared with the HF with an average treatment level of 77% and 68% was achieved in both systems, respectively. The review revealed that the CW is an effective and sustainable technology for wastewater treatment with the initial influent level, microbial biofilm, detention time, plant species and configuration among the most dominating parameters that are directly controlling the removal rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Marwa M. Waly & Taha Ahmed & Ziyad Abunada & Slobodan B. Mickovski & Craig Thomson, 2022. "Constructed Wetland for Sustainable and Low-Cost Wastewater Treatment: Review Article," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1388-:d:896230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/9/1388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hussain, M. Iftikhar & Muscolo, Adele & Farooq, Muhammad & Ahmad, Waqar, 2019. "Sustainable use and management of non-conventional water resources for rehabilitation of marginal lands in arid and semiarid environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 462-476.
    2. José Alberto Herrera-Melián & Mónica Mendoza-Aguiar & Rayco Guedes-Alonso & Pilar García-Jiménez & Marina Carrasco-Acosta & Ezio Ranieri, 2020. "Multistage Horizontal Subsurface Flow vs. Hybrid Constructed Wetlands for the Treatment of Raw Urban Wastewater," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María Jesica Montero-Martínez & María del Refugio Castañeda-Chávez & Fabiola Lango-Reynoso & Gabycarmen Navarrete-Rodríguez & Leonardo Martínez-Cárdenas, 2023. "Removal of Pathogenic Bacteria in a Horizontally Fed Subsurface Constructed Wetland Hybrid System," J, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regmi, Rupesh & Zhang, Zhuo & Zhang, Hongpeng, 2023. "Entrepreneurship strategy, natural resources management and sustainable performance: A study of an emerging market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    2. Chen, Dali & Bao, Jinglong & Chen, Tao & Bai, Mengjie & Pan, Jia & Yuan, Haiying & Wang, Yanrong & Nan, Zhibiao & Hu, Xiaowen, 2024. "Effect of drip irrigation and boron application on enhancing seed production of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    3. Ghalia Saleem Aljeddani, 2022. "Reusing Sewage Effluent in Greening Urban Areas: A Case Study of: Southern Jeddah, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Štefan Bojnec & Umar Daraz & Younas Khan, 2024. "Harvesting Sunlight: The Promise of Agro-Photovoltaic Fusion Systems for Sustainable Agriculture and Renewable Energy Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Yiding Wang & Yaning Chen & Weili Duan & Li Jiao, 2022. "Evaluation of Sustainable Water Resource Use in the Tarim River Basin Based on Water Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Efthymios Rodias & Eirini Aivazidou & Charisios Achillas & Dimitrios Aidonis & Dionysis Bochtis, 2020. "Water-Energy-Nutrients Synergies in the Agrifood Sector: A Circular Economy Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Mahmoud S. Hashem & Wei Guo & Xuebin Qi & Ping Li, 2022. "Assessing the Effect of Irrigation with Reclaimed Water Using Different Irrigation Techniques on Tomatoes Quality Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Chojnacka, K. & Witek-Krowiak, A. & Moustakas, K. & Skrzypczak, D. & Mikula, K. & Loizidou, M., 2020. "A transition from conventional irrigation to fertigation with reclaimed wastewater: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    9. Hussain, M. Iftikhar & Al-Dakheel, Abdullah J. & Chaudhry, Usman Khalid & Khan, Muhammad Imran & ALHaithloul, Haifa Abdulaziz Sakit & Alghanem, Suliman Mohammed & Alaklabi, Abdullah, 2022. "Morpho-physiological response of barley to assess genotypic differences of salinity tolerance under hyper arid climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    10. Muhammad Iftikhar Hussain & Zafar Iqbal Khan & Majida Naeem & Kafeel Ahmad & Muhammad Umer Farooq Awan & Mona S. Alwahibi & Mohamed Soliman Elshikh, 2021. "Blood, Hair and Feces as an Indicator of Environmental Exposure of Sheep, Cow and Buffalo to Cobalt: A Health Risk Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Yang Kong & Weijun He & Liang Yuan & Juqin Shen & Min An & Dagmawi Mulugeta Degefu & Xin Gao & Zhaofang Zhang & Fuhua Sun & Zhongchi Wan, 2019. "Decoupling Analysis of Water Footprint and Economic Growth: A Case Study of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region from 2004 to 2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Fabio Conti & Elena Cristina Rada & Paolo Viotti & Massimo Raboni, 2021. "Removal and Survival of Fecal Indicators in a Constructed Wetland after UASB Pre-Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Guo, Fu-Xing & Wang, Yan-Ping & Hou, Ting-Ting & Zhang, Lin-Sen & Mu, Yan & Wu, Fu-yong, 2021. "Variation of soil moisture and fine roots distribution adopts rainwater collection, infiltration promoting and soil anti-seepage system (RCIP-SA) in hilly apple orchard on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    14. Dafne Crutchik & José Luis Campos, 2021. "Municipal Wastewater Reuse: Is it a Competitive Alternative to Seawater Desalination?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, June.
    15. Batool, Fauzia & Hussain, M. Iftikhar & Nazar, Sonaina & Bashir, Humayun & Khan, Zafar Iqbal & Ahmad, Kafeel & Alnuwaiser, Maha Abdallah & Yang, Hsi-Hsien, 2023. "Potential of sewage irrigation for heavy metal contamination in soil–wheat grain system: Ecological risk and environmental fate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    16. Hassan A. Awaad & Elsayed Mansour & Mohammad Akrami & Hassan E.S. Fath & Akbar A. Javadi & Abdelazim Negm, 2020. "Availability and Feasibility of Water Desalination as a Non-Conventional Resource for Agricultural Irrigation in the MENA Region: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Jiayu Peng & Binghui Zheng & Zhaosheng Chu & Xing Wang, 2020. "Attaining Sustainable Water Resource Utilization in Lake Basins Using Progressive Operational Scenario Analysis," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(3), pages 887-904, February.
    18. Ilker Ugulu & Shehnaz Bibi & Zafar Iqbal Khan & Kafeel Ahmad & Mudasra Munir & Ifra Saleem Malik & Abid Ejaz & Abdulwahed Fahad Alrefaei, 2023. "Biomonitoring of Heavy Metal and Metalloid Contamination in Industrial Wastewater Irrigated Areas Using Sugar Beet ( Brassica oleracea L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Tarek Ben Hassen & Hamid El Bilali & Mohammed Al-Maadeed, 2020. "Agri-Food Markets in Qatar: Drivers, Trends, and Policy Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-31, May.
    20. J. M. Aishwarya & R. Vidhya, 2023. "Study on the Efficiency of a Hydroponic Treatment for Removing Organic Loading from Wastewater and Its Application as a Nutrient for the “ Amaranthus campestris ” Plant for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:9:p:1388-:d:896230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.