IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i8p1336-d890741.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Their Response to Landscape Patterns at Different Scales in an Agricultural Basin in Central China

Author

Listed:
  • Kun Li

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Junchen Chen

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Jingyu Lin

    (School of Ecology, Environment and Resources, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Huanyu Zhang

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Yujing Xie

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Zhaohua Li

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Ling Wang

    (Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

Abstract

Identifying relationships among multiple ecosystem services (ESs) at different scales and the factors affecting such relationships is the foundation for sustainable ecosystem management. A case study was conducted in the Sihu Lake Basin, an agricultural basin in Central China, to examine the interactions among ESs across different scales and the responses to landscape pattern changes (2000–2020). The results indicate that (1) agricultural land and wetlands were converted into construction land and gradually decreased in size; forestland and artificial channels gradually increased in size. (2) ESs had spatial heterogeneity in their strength at the grid and county scales. (3) Most relationships between ESs were synergistic at the grid and county scales, and most correlations increased as the scale increased due to landscape consistency. (4) The landscape metrics explained approximately 45.56–61.06% of the variations in ESs, and the main influencing factor was agricultural land. Our results demonstrated that the construction of rivers and channels, dense and widely distributed agricultural land and construction land were more positively correlated with increasing crop production and nitrogen export, whereas forestland exhibited a stronger contribution to increasing carbon storage and water yield. These findings explore appropriate management methods for agricultural development and ecological conservation in agricultural basins.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun Li & Junchen Chen & Jingyu Lin & Huanyu Zhang & Yujing Xie & Zhaohua Li & Ling Wang, 2022. "Identifying Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Their Response to Landscape Patterns at Different Scales in an Agricultural Basin in Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1336-:d:890741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/8/1336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Plunge, Svajunas & Gudas, Mindaugas & Povilaitis, Arvydas, 2022. "Effectiveness of best management practices for non-point source agricultural water pollution control with changing climate – Lithuania’s case," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Zhengxin Ji & Hejie Wei & Dong Xue & Mengxue Liu & Enxiang Cai & Weiqiang Chen & Xinwei Feng & Jiwei Li & Jie Lu & Yulong Guo, 2021. "Trade-Off and Projecting Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services under Different Policies Scenarios: A Case Study in Central China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-23, March.
    3. M. R. Tchalala & P. M. Bhatt & K. N. Chappanda & S. R. Tavares & K. Adil & Y. Belmabkhout & A. Shkurenko & A. Cadiau & N. Heymans & G. Weireld & G. Maurin & K. N. Salama & M. Eddaoudi, 2019. "Fluorinated MOF platform for selective removal and sensing of SO2 from flue gas and air," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    5. Xiaoyan Li & Gulinaer Suoerdahan & Zhenyu Shi & Zihan Xing & Yongxing Ren & Ran Yang, 2021. "Spatial–Temporal Impacts of Urban Sprawl on Ecosystem Services: Implications for Urban Planning in the Process of Rapid Urbanization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Vallet, Améline & Locatelli, Bruno & Levrel, Harold & Wunder, Sven & Seppelt, Ralf & Scholes, Robert J. & Oszwald, Johan, 2018. "Relationships Between Ecosystem Services: Comparing Methods for Assessing Tradeoffs and Synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-106.
    7. Jie Zhao & Cheng Li, 2022. "Investigating Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies and Their Influencing Factors in the Yangtze River Delta Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Gashaw, Temesgen & Tulu, Taffa & Argaw, Mekuria & Worqlul, Abeyou W. & Tolessa, Terefe & Kindu, Mengistie, 2018. "Estimating the impacts of land use/land cover changes on Ecosystem Service Values: The case of the Andassa watershed in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 219-228.
    9. Mengxue Liu & Xiaobin Dong & Xuechao Wang & Bingyu Zhao & Hejie Wei & Weiguo Fan & Chenyang Zhang, 2022. "The Trade-Offs/Synergies and Their Spatial-Temporal Characteristics between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being Linked to Land-Use Change in the Capital Region of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Ayambire, Raphael Anammasiya & Amponsah, Owusu & Peprah, Charles & Takyi, Stephen Appiah, 2019. "A review of practices for sustaining urban and peri-urban agriculture: Implications for land use planning in rapidly urbanising Ghanaian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 260-277.
    11. Yang Bai & Christina P. Wong & Bo Jiang & Alice C. Hughes & Min Wang & Qing Wang, 2018. "Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Santiago Madrigal-Martínez & José Luis Miralles i García, 2020. "Assessment Method and Scale of Observation Influence Ecosystem Service Bundles," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Xu & Guangqing Chi & Yongheng Rao & Jianjun Zhang, 2022. "Editorial for Special Issue “Land Use Change and Anthropogenic Disturbances: Relationships, Interactions, and Management”," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-6, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moreno-Llorca, R. & Vaz, A.S. & Herrero, J. & Millares, A. & Bonet-García, F.J. & Alcaraz-Segura, D., 2020. "Multi-scale evolution of ecosystem services’ supply in Sierra Nevada (Spain): An assessment over the last half-century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    2. Agudelo, César Augusto Ruiz & Bustos, Sandra Liliana Hurtado & Moreno, Carmen Alicia Parrado, 2020. "Modeling interactions among multiple ecosystem services. A critical review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    3. Jones, Sarah K. & Boundaogo, Mansour & DeClerck, Fabrice A. & Estrada-Carmona, Natalia & Mirumachi, Naho & Mulligan, Mark, 2019. "Insights into the importance of ecosystem services to human well-being in reservoir landscapes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    4. Hengyu Pan & Yong Geng & Ji Han & Cheng Huang & Wenyi Han & Zhuang Miao, 2020. "Emergy Based Decoupling Analysis of Ecosystem Services on Urbanization: A Case of Shanghai, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    5. Muluberhan Biedemariam & Emiru Birhane & Biadgilgn Demissie & Tewodros Tadesse & Girmay Gebresamuel & Solomon Habtu, 2022. "Ecosystem Service Values as Related to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Ethiopia: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Henghui Xi & Wanglai Cui & Li Cai & Mengyuan Chen & Chenglei Xu, 2021. "Evaluation and Prediction of Ecosystem Service Value in the Zhoushan Islands Based on LUCC," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    7. Qian Xu & Ying Yang & Ren Yang & Li-Si Zha & Zi-Qing Lin & Shu-Hao Shang, 2023. "Spatial Trade-Offs and Synergies between Ecosystem Services in Guangdong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Raviv, Orna & Shiri, Zemah-Shamir & Ido, Izhaki & Alon, Lotan, 2021. "The effect of wildfire and land-cover changes on the economic value of ecosystem services in Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    9. Fengran Wei & Mingshun Xiang & Lanlan Deng & Yao Wang & Wenheng Li & Suhua Yang & Zhenni Wu, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Their Driving Forces of Ecological Service Value in Transitional Geospace: A Case Study in the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Joly, Frédéric & Benoit, Marc & Martin, Raphael & Dumont, Bertrand, 2021. "Biological operability, a new concept based on ergonomics to assess the pertinence of ecosystem services optimization practices," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    11. Jiang, Wei & Wu, Tong & Fu, Bojie, 2021. "The value of ecosystem services in China: A systematic review for twenty years," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    12. Xiaoyan Zhang & Jian Ji, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Drivers in the Jiangsu Coastal Zone, Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    13. Feng, Zhe & Jin, Xueru & Chen, Tianqian & Wu, Jiansheng, 2021. "Understanding trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services to support the decision-making in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Shuming Ma & Jie Huang & Yingying Chai, 2021. "Proposing a GEE-Based Spatiotemporally Adjusted Value Transfer Method to Assess Land-Use Changes and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Service Values in the Shenyang Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Chen, Chengjing & Liu, Yihua, 2021. "Spatiotemporal changes of ecosystem services value by incorporating planning policies: A case of the Pearl River Delta, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 461(C).
    16. Hualin Xie & Zhenhong Zhu & Zhe Li, 2022. "Spatial Divergence Analysis of Ecosystem Service Value in Hilly Mountainous Areas: A Case Study of Ruijin City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Kwadwo Kyenkyehene Kusi & Abdellatif Khattabi & Nadia Mhammdi, 2023. "Analyzing the impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in the main watersheds of Morocco," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2688-2715, March.
    18. Li Li & Yonghui Li & Lan Yang & Ying Liang & Wenliang Zhao & Guanyu Chen, 2022. "How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Yongjun Du & Xiaolong Li & Xinlin He & Xiaoqian Li & Guang Yang & Dongbo Li & Wenhe Xu & Xiang Qiao & Chen Li & Lu Sui, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation and Trade-Off Analysis of Ecological Service Value in the Manas River Basin Based on Land Use Optimization in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-31, May.
    20. Hongmi Koo & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2020. "Integrating Ecosystem Services into Land-Use Modeling to Assess the Effects of Future Land-Use Strategies in Northern Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:8:p:1336-:d:890741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.