IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i4p543-d789253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Aboveground Biomass (AGB) of Gobi Desert Shrub Communities in Northwestern China Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) RGB Images

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Ding

    (Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Zhipeng Li

    (Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Heyu Zhang

    (Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Pu Zhang

    (Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Xiaoming Cao

    (Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Yiming Feng

    (Institute of Desertification Studies, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China)

Abstract

Shrubs are an important part of the Gobi Desert ecosystem, and their aboveground biomass (AGB) is an important manifestation of the productivity of the Gobi Desert ecosystem. Characterizing the biophysical properties of low-stature vegetation such as shrubs in the Gobi Desert via conventional field surveys and satellite remote sensing images is challenging. The AGB of shrubs had been estimated from spectral variables taken from high-resolution images obtained by unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in the Gobi Desert, Xinjiang, China, using vegetation feature metrics. The main results were as follows: (1) Based on the UAV images, several RGB vegetation indices (RGB VIs) were selected to extract the vegetation coverage, and it was found that the excess green index (EXG) had the highest accuracy and the overall extraction accuracy of vegetation coverage reached 97.00%. (2) According to field sample plot surveys, the AGB and shrub crown area of single shrubs in the Gobi Desert were in line with a power model. From the bottom of the alluvial fan to the top of the alluvial fan, as the altitude increased, the AGB of the vegetation communities showed an increasing trend: the AGB of the vegetation communities at the bottom of the alluvial fan was 2–90 g/m 2 , while that at the top of the alluvial fan was 60–201 g/m 2 . (3) Vegetation coverage (based on the UAV image EXG index) and AGB showed a good correlation. The two conform to the relationship model (R 2 = 0.897) and the expression is Y = 1167.341 x 0.946 , where Y is the AGB of the sample plots in units g/m 2 and x is the vegetation coverage extracted by the VI. (4) The predicted AGB values of Gobi Desert shrubs using UAV RGB images based on a power model were closer to the actual observed AGB values. The study findings provide a more efficient, accurate, and low-cost method for estimating vegetation coverage and AGB of Gobi Desert shrubs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Ding & Zhipeng Li & Heyu Zhang & Pu Zhang & Xiaoming Cao & Yiming Feng, 2022. "Quantifying the Aboveground Biomass (AGB) of Gobi Desert Shrub Communities in Northwestern China Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) RGB Images," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:543-:d:789253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/543/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/4/543/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adhikari, Arjun & White, Joseph D., 2016. "Climate change impacts on regenerating shrubland productivity," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 337(C), pages 211-220.
    2. Benjamin Poulter & David Frank & Philippe Ciais & Ranga B. Myneni & Niels Andela & Jian Bi & Gregoire Broquet & Josep G. Canadell & Frederic Chevallier & Yi Y. Liu & Steven W. Running & Stephen Sitch , 2014. "Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle," Nature, Nature, vol. 509(7502), pages 600-603, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yao Zhang & Pierre Gentine & Xiangzhong Luo & Xu Lian & Yanlan Liu & Sha Zhou & Anna M. Michalak & Wu Sun & Joshua B. Fisher & Shilong Piao & Trevor F. Keenan, 2022. "Increasing sensitivity of dryland vegetation greenness to precipitation due to rising atmospheric CO2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Wenmin Zhang & Guy Schurgers & Josep Peñuelas & Rasmus Fensholt & Hui Yang & Jing Tang & Xiaowei Tong & Philippe Ciais & Martin Brandt, 2023. "Recent decrease of the impact of tropical temperature on the carbon cycle linked to increased precipitation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Xiangzhong Luo & Trevor F. Keenan, 2022. "Tropical extreme droughts drive long-term increase in atmospheric CO2 growth rate variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Qing Huang & Weimin Ju & Fangyi Zhang & Qian Zhang, 2019. "Roles of Climate Change and Increasing CO 2 in Driving Changes of Net Primary Productivity in China Simulated Using a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Gabriela Guillen-Cruz & Emmanuel F. Campuzano & René Juárez-Altamirano & Karla Liliana López-García & Roberto Torres-Arreola & Dulce Flores-Rentería, 2023. "Interannual Variation and Control Factors of Soil Respiration in Xeric Shrubland and Agricultural Sites from the Chihuahuan Desert, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Chen, Yizhao & Fei, Xinran & Groisman, Pavel & Sun, Zhengguo & Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Zhihao, 2019. "Contrasting policy shifts influence the pattern of vegetation production and C sequestration over pasture systems: A regional-scale comparison in Temperate Eurasian Steppe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Lina Liu & Jiansheng Qu & Feng Gao & Tek Narayan Maraseni & Shaojian Wang & Suman Aryal & Zhenhua Zhang & Rong Wu, 2024. "Land Use Carbon Emissions or Sink: Research Characteristics, Hotspots and Future Perspectives," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Kaiqiang Bao & Haifeng Tian & Min Su & Liping Qiu & Xiaorong Wei & Yanjiang Zhang & Jian Liu & Hailong Gao & Jimin Cheng, 2019. "Stability of Ecosystem CO 2 Flux in Response to Changes in Precipitation in a Semiarid Grassland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Li, Xiran & Zhu, Zaichun & Zeng, Hui & Piao, Shilong, 2016. "Estimation of gross primary production in China (1982–2010) with multiple ecosystem models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 324(C), pages 33-44.
    10. Qing Gu & Hui Zheng & Li Yao & Min Wang & Mingguo Ma & Xufeng Wang & Xuguang Tang, 2020. "Performance of the Remotely-Derived Products in Monitoring Gross Primary Production across Arid and Semi-Arid Ecosystems in Northwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Kai Wang & Ana Bastos & Philippe Ciais & Xuhui Wang & Christian Rödenbeck & Pierre Gentine & Frédéric Chevallier & Vincent W. Humphrey & Chris Huntingford & Michael O’Sullivan & Sonia I. Seneviratne, 2022. "Regional and seasonal partitioning of water and temperature controls on global land carbon uptake variability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Jing Peng & Fuqiang Yang & Li Dan & Xiba Tang, 2022. "Estimation of China’s Contribution to Global Greening over the Past Three Decades," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Zhongyi Sun & Xiufeng Wang & Haruhiko Yamamoto & Hiroshi Tani & Tangzhe Nie, 2020. "The effects of spatiotemporal patterns of atmospheric CO2 concentration on terrestrial gross primary productivity estimation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 913-930, November.
    14. Gupta, Rajit & Sharma, Laxmi Kant, 2019. "The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: A review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 55-73.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:543-:d:789253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.