IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i10p1769-d939977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Herbaceous Biomass for Grazing and Fire Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Edward C. Rhodes

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas Water Resources Institute, 1001 Holleman Drive East, College Station, TX 77843, USA)

  • Douglas R. Tolleson

    (Texas A&M AgriLife Research, P.O. Box 918, Sonora, TX 76950, USA)

  • Jay P. Angerer

    (USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, 243 Fort Keogh Road, Miles City, MT 59301, USA)

Abstract

Both grazing and fine fuels management are dependent on the temporal and spatial distribution of herbaceous biomass production. Rangeland and wildland fire managers can both benefit from knowing when and where there is excessive herbaceous biomass buildup. In this study, we compared modeled herbaceous biomass outputs from the Phytomass Growth Simulator (Phygrow) to observe and predict herbaceous production on desert, juniper, and pine sites on the Coconino National Forest in Arizona. Models were validated with: (a) 2 years of quarterly data, and (b) fire season-only data. The Phygrow model showed strong agreement between observed and predicted values year-round on the desert (r 2 = 0.73) and pine sites (r 2 = 0.69), and a lower, but positive agreement in the juniper sites (r 2 = 0.54). Fire season predictions were strong for all ecosystem types (desert r 2 = 0.89; juniper r 2 = 0.62; pine r 2 = 0.94), suggesting that the Phygrow model is well suited to provide valuable decision support information with which to address both rangeland and fire management objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward C. Rhodes & Douglas R. Tolleson & Jay P. Angerer, 2022. "Modeling Herbaceous Biomass for Grazing and Fire Risk Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1769-:d:939977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1769/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/10/1769/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zilverberg, Cody J. & Angerer, Jay & Williams, Jimmy & Metz, Loretta J. & Harmoney, Keith, 2018. "Sensitivity of diet choices and environmental outcomes to a selective grazing algorithm," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 390(C), pages 10-22.
    2. Zilverberg, Cody J. & Williams, Jimmy & Jones, Curtis & Harmoney, Keith & Angerer, Jay & Metz, Loretta J. & Fox, William, 2017. "Process-based simulation of prairie growth," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 24-35.
    3. Lee, Andrew C. & Conner, J. Richard & Mjelde, James W. & Richardson, James W. & Stuth, Jerry W., 2001. "Regional Cost Share Necessary For Rancher Participation In Brush Control," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A, Tadesse & Jeong, Jaehak & Green, Colleen H.M., 2022. "Modeling landscape wind erosion processes on rangelands using the APEX model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    2. Meki, Manyowa N. & Osorio-Leyton, Javier & Steglich, Evelyn M. & Kiniry, Jim R. & Propato, Marco & Winchell, Mike & Rathjens, Hendrik & Angerer, Jay P. & Norfleet, Lee M., 2023. "Plant parameterization and APEXgraze model calibration and validation for US land resource region H grazing lands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Cheng, G. & Harmel, R.D. & Ma, L. & Derner, J.D. & Augustine, D.J. & Bartling, P.N.S. & Fang, Q.X. & Williams, J.R. & Zilverberg, C.J. & Boone, R.B. & Hoover, D. & Yu, Q., 2021. "Evaluation of APEX modifications to simulate forage production for grazing management decision-support in the Western US Great Plains," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Fang, Q.X. & Harmel, R.D. & Ma, L. & Bartling, P.N.S. & Derner, J.D. & Jeong, J. & Williams, J.R. & Boone, R.B., 2022. "Evaluating the APEX model for alternative cow-calf grazing management strategies in Central Texas," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Ungar, Eugene David, 2019. "Perspectives on the concept of rangeland carrying capacity, and their exploration by means of Noy-Meir's two-function model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 403-413.
    6. Rhoda F. Aderinto & J. Alfonso Ortega-S. & Ambrose O. Anoruo & Richard Machen & Benjamin L. Turner, 2020. "Can the Tragedy of the Commons be Avoided in Common-Pool Forage Resource Systems? An Application to Small-Holder Herding in the Semi-Arid Grazing Lands of Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    7. Ruichen Xu & Yong Pang & Zhibing Hu & Xiaoyan Hu, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Water Quality and Main Controlling Factors of Algal Blooms in Tai Lake, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Tanaka, John A. & Rimbey, Neil R. & Torell, L. Allen, 2005. "Rangeland Economics, Ecology, And Sustainability: Implications For Policy And Economic Research," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7.
    9. Dianne A Stroman & Urs P Kreuter & Carissa L Wonkka, 2020. "Landowner perceptions of woody plants and prescribed fire in the Southern Plains, USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Merri E. Day & Minfeng Tang & Phillip A. Lancaster & Deann Presley & Dustin L. Pendell & Walter H. Fick & Luca Doro & Adam Ahlers & Andrew Ricketts, 2023. "Simulation of the Impact of Rangeland Management Strategies on Soil Health, Environmental Footprint, Economic Impact, and Human-Edible Nutrient Conversion from Grasslands in the Central and Northern G," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-43, August.
    11. Zilverberg, Cody J. & Angerer, Jay & Williams, Jimmy & Metz, Loretta J. & Harmoney, Keith, 2018. "Sensitivity of diet choices and environmental outcomes to a selective grazing algorithm," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 390(C), pages 10-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:10:p:1769-:d:939977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.