IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/31036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Cost Share Necessary For Rancher Participation In Brush Control

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Andrew C.
  • Conner, J. Richard
  • Mjelde, James W.
  • Richardson, James W.
  • Stuth, Jerry W.

Abstract

Large-scale brush-control programs are being proposed in Texas to increase off-site water yields. Biophysical and economic simulation models are combined to estimate the effects of brush control on representative ranches in four ecological regions of the Edwards Plateau area of Texas. Net present values of representative ranches in three of four regions decrease with brush control. Cost shares necessary for ranches from the three regions to break even range from 7% to 31% of total brush-control costs. Any large-scale brush-control program will therefore require a substantial investment by the state of Texas.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Andrew C. & Conner, J. Richard & Mjelde, James W. & Richardson, James W. & Stuth, Jerry W., 2001. "Regional Cost Share Necessary For Rancher Participation In Brush Control," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31036
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31036/files/26020478.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thurow, Amy P. & Conner, J. Richard & Thurow, Thomas L. & Garriga, Matthew D., 2001. "A preliminary analysis of Texas ranchers' willingness to participate in a brush control cost-sharing program to improve off-site water yields," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 139-152, April.
    2. Pope, C. Arden & Goodwin, H. L., 1983. "Determinants of Rural Land Values in Texas," Departmental Reports 257852, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanaka, John A. & Rimbey, Neil R. & Torell, L. Allen, 2005. "Rangeland Economics, Ecology, And Sustainability: Implications For Policy And Economic Research," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(1), pages 1-7.
    2. Dianne A Stroman & Urs P Kreuter & Carissa L Wonkka, 2020. "Landowner perceptions of woody plants and prescribed fire in the Southern Plains, USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Edward C. Rhodes & Douglas R. Tolleson & Jay P. Angerer, 2022. "Modeling Herbaceous Biomass for Grazing and Fire Risk Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garcίa-Yi, Jaqueline, 2010. "Heterogeneous Motivations of Household - Level Coca Growing Areas: The Case of an Indigenous Community in Peru," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Hannover 2010 23, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics.
    2. Olenick, Keith L. & Kreuter, Urs P. & Conner, J. Richard, 2005. "Texas landowner perceptions regarding ecosystem services and cost-sharing land management programs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 247-260, April.
    3. Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam & Badhon Kumar Shill & Roquia Salam & Md. Nur Alam Siddik & Masum Ahmed Patwary, 2021. "Insight into farmers’ agricultural adaptive strategy to climate change in northern Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2439-2464, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:31036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.