IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p304-d518102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Global Research Trends of Land Use Planning Based on a Bibliometric Analysis: Current Status and Future Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Tiangui Lv

    (School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
    Institute of Ecological Civilization, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Li Wang

    (School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Hualin Xie

    (Institute of Ecological Civilization, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Xinmin Zhang

    (Institute of Ecological Civilization, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

  • Yanwei Zhang

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The land topic has generally become a major socioeconomic issue that currently attracts attention globally. To explore the issue, various countries devote much attention to land use planning. This paper searches the Core Collection of the Web of Science and collects 1771 land use planning articles published between 1990 and 2019. The R software, biblioshiny package, and CiteSpace are applied in this paper. The results show the following: (1) the number of papers related to land use planning has shown an overall growth trend, which can be divided into the following four stages: initial exploration, preliminary growth, stable development, and rapid development; (2) the United States is in an absolute leading position as the primary research force among developed countries. The top 3 countries related to international cooperation are the United States, China, and Italy; (3) land use planning, land use, GIS, urban planning, China, spatial planning and climate change are some high-frequency keywords used in land use planning; (4) the current research hot spots mainly focus on the relationship between land use spatial planning and regional planning, land informatization development, public participation, urban sprawl, and sustainable development; (5) the themes show 8 evolutionary paths related to the following four topics: ecosystem protection, climate and natural change, urban sprawl and agricultural development, and GIS development; (6) this paper proposes that strengthening integration within disciplines, introducing new theories and methods, and sustainable land use will become future research directions requiring more land use planning attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiangui Lv & Li Wang & Hualin Xie & Xinmin Zhang & Yanwei Zhang, 2021. "Exploring the Global Research Trends of Land Use Planning Based on a Bibliometric Analysis: Current Status and Future Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:304-:d:518102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/304/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/304/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz Santos, 2017. "Improving Urban Planning Information, Transparency and Participation in Public Administrations," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 6(4), pages 58-75, October.
    2. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    3. Michael White & Philip Allmendinger, 2003. "Land-use Planning and the Housing Market: A Comparative Review of the UK and the USA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 953-972, May.
    4. M.J. Cobo & A.G. López-Herrera & E. Herrera-Viedma & F. Herrera, 2011. "Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(7), pages 1382-1402, July.
    5. Le Bivic, Camille & Melot, Romain, 2020. "Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Yanwei Zhang & Hualin Xie, 2019. "Interactive Relationship among Urban Expansion, Economic Development, and Population Growth since the Reform and Opening up in China: An Analysis Based on a Vector Error Correction Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Ian Burton & Livia Bizikova & Thea Dickinson & Yvonne Howard, 2007. "Integrating adaptation into policy: upscaling evidence from local to global," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 371-376, July.
    8. Hualin Xie & Yanwei Zhang & Yongrok Choi & Fengqin Li, 2020. "A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Cheng Duan & Peili Shi & Minghua Song & Xianzhou Zhang & Ning Zong & Caiping Zhou, 2019. "Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Kailash Sacred Landscape of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Ying Huang & Donghua Zhu & Qi Lv & Alan L. Porter & Douglas K. R. Robinson & Xuefeng Wang, 2017. "Early insights on the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI): an overlay map-based bibliometric study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 2041-2057, June.
    11. Hualin Xie & Yanwei Zhang & Zhilong Wu & Tiangui Lv, 2020. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-37, January.
    12. Richard Peiser, 2011. "A Review of “America's Waterfront Revival: Port Authorities and Urban Redevelopment”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(3), pages 296-296.
    13. Hualin Xie & Yuyang Wen & Yongrok Choi & Xinmin Zhang, 2021. "Global Trends on Food Security Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Stevens, Mark R. & Senbel, Maged, 2017. "Are municipal land use plans keeping pace with global climate change?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Peter Gordon & Harry W. Richardson, 2001. "The Sprawl Debate:Let Markets Plan," Working Paper 8638, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    16. Livia Bizikova & John Robinson & Stewart Cohen, 2007. "Linking climate change and sustainable development at the local level," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 271-277, July.
    17. Bornmann, Lutz & Marx, Werner, 2018. "Critical rationalism and the search for standard (field-normalized) indicators in bibliometrics," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 598-604.
    18. Ayambire, Raphael Anammasiya & Amponsah, Owusu & Peprah, Charles & Takyi, Stephen Appiah, 2019. "A review of practices for sustaining urban and peri-urban agriculture: Implications for land use planning in rapidly urbanising Ghanaian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 260-277.
    19. Hualin Xie & Yingqian Huang & Qianru Chen & Yanwei Zhang & Qing Wu, 2019. "Prospects for Agricultural Sustainable Intensification: A Review of Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-27, October.
    20. Peter Gordon & Harry W. Richardson, 0. "The Sprawl Debate: Let Markets Plan," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 31(3), pages 131-149.
    21. M. Gallardo & J. Martínez-Vega, 2016. "Three decades of land-use changes in the region of Madrid and how they relate to territorial planning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 1016-1033, May.
    22. Leyre Echevarría Icaza & Andy Van den Dobbelsteen & Frank Van der Hoeven, 2016. "Integrating Urban Heat Assessment in Urban Plans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-15, March.
    23. Hongsheng Zhong & Randolph W. Hall & Maged Dessouky, 2007. "Territory Planning and Vehicle Dispatching with Driver Learning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 74-89, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiao Zhang & Qian Wang & Yiping Xia & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Lei Zhu & Chenyujing Yang & Yuanyuan Zhang & Yongji Xue, 2022. "Using Marginal Land Resources to Solve the Shortage of Rural Entrepreneurial Land in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Vincent Wretling & Berit Balfors, 2021. "Are Local Authorities Building Their Capacity to Plan for Reduced Climate Impact? A Longitudinal Analysis of Swedish Comprehensive Plans," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Eunice Lopes & Noelia Araújo-Vila & André Riani Costa Perinotto & Lucília Cardoso, 2022. "Tourism and Land Planning in Natural Spaces: Bibliometric Approach to the Structure of Scientific Concepts," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinxin Wang & Zeshui Xu & Yong Qin, 2022. "Structure, trend and prospect of operational research: a scientific analysis for publications from 1952 to 2020 included in Web of Science database," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 649-672, December.
    2. Yiming Xiao & Han Wu & Guohua Wang & Hong Mei, 2021. "Mapping the Worldwide Trends on Energy Poverty Research: A Bibliometric Analysis (1999–2019)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Hualin Xie & Yanwei Zhang & Yongrok Choi & Fengqin Li, 2020. "A Scientometrics Review on Land Ecosystem Service Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Qian Wang & Shixian Luo & Jiao Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Increased Attention to Smart Development in Rural Areas: A Scientometric Analysis of Smart Village Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Ying Liang & Wei Song, 2022. "Ecological and Environmental Effects of Land Use and Cover Changes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Lanzalonga Federico & Chmet Federico & Petrolo Basilio & Brescia Valerio, 2023. "Exploring Diversity Management to Avoid Social Washing and Pinkwashing: Using Bibliometric Analysis to Shape Future Research Directions," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 41-65, March.
    8. Wenjia Zhang & Ming Zhang, 2018. "Incorporating land use and pricing policies for reducing car dependence: Analytical framework and empirical evidence," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(13), pages 3012-3033, October.
    9. Abdulaziz I. Almulhim & Simon Elias Bibri & Ayyoob Sharifi & Shakil Ahmad & Khalid Mohammed Almatar, 2022. "Emerging Trends and Knowledge Structures of Urbanization and Environmental Sustainability: A Regional Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Riaz Tabassum & Selama Aslam Izah & Nor Normaziah Mohd & Hassan Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh, 2024. "Meaningful Review of Existing Trends, Expansion, and Future Directions of Green Bond Research: A Bibliometric Approach," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 34(1), pages 1-36, March.
    11. Zamani, Mehdi & Yalcin, Haydar & Naeini, Ali Bonyadi & Zeba, Gordana & Daim, Tugrul U, 2022. "Developing metrics for emerging technologies: identification and assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Leng Liu & Bo Liu & Wei Song & Hao Yu, 2023. "The Relationship between Rural Sustainability and Land Use: A Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Secinaro, Silvana & Calandra, Davide & Lanzalonga, Federico & Ferraris, Alberto, 2022. "Electric vehicles’ consumer behaviours: Mapping the field and providing a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 399-416.
    14. Samreen Hamid & Asif Saeed & Umar Farooq & Faisal Alnori, 2022. "A Bibliometric Retrospection of CSR from the Lens of Finance and Economics: Towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Mohammed H. Alzard & Hilal El-Hassan & Tamer El-Maaddawy & Marwa Alsalami & Fatma Abdulrahman & Ashraf Aly Hassan, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis of the Studies on Self-Healing Concrete Published between 1974 and 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Valentina Della Corte & Giovanna Del Gaudio & Fabiana Sepe & Fabiana Sciarelli, 2019. "Sustainable Tourism in the Open Innovation Realm: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Huixin Wang & Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Duy Thong Ta & Qian Wang & Jiao Zhang & Daer Su & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay between Landscape Planning and Human Well-Being: A Scientometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    18. Davidescu, Adriana AnaMaria & Petcu, Monica Aureliana & Curea, Stefania Cristina & Manta, Eduard Mihai, 2022. "Two faces of the same coin: Exploring the multilateral perspective of informality in relation to Sustainable Development Goals based on bibliometric analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 683-705.
    19. Leng Liu & Congjie Cao & Wei Song, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis in the Field of Rural Revitalization: Current Status, Progress, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Hana Tomaskova & Martin Kopecky, 2020. "Specialization of Business Process Model and Notation Applications in Medicine—A Review," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-42, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:304-:d:518102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.