IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i3p232-d506025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ecological Service System Based Study on Suburban Rural Landscape Multifunction

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zheng

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Lisha Na

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Binglin Liu

    (The Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    School of Geographic & Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Tiantian Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China)

  • Hao Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Suburban rural landscape multifunction has received increasing attention from scholars due to its high demand and impact on main urban areas. However, few studies have been focused on suburban rural landscape multifunction because of data constraints. The present study quantified the four landscape services based on ecological service system, i.e., regulating function (RF), provision function (PF), culture function (CF), and support function (SF), determined the interaction through the Spearman correlation coefficient, and ultimately identified the landscape multifunction hotspots and dominant functions through overlay analysis. The result indicated that suburban rural communities have exhibited the characteristics of regional multifunction, and the landscape multifunction hotspots accounted for 64.2%; it should be particularly noted that, among single-function, dual-function, and multifunction hotspots, both support function, and culture function was dominant, while only one case was found in which the regulating function was dominant. Furthermore, all landscape functions other than SF-CF exhibited certain correlations. The study suggests that planning and management should be performed in future in combination with landscape multifunction to ensure the sustainable development of suburban rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zheng & Lisha Na & Binglin Liu & Tiantian Zhang & Hao Wang, 2021. "An Ecological Service System Based Study on Suburban Rural Landscape Multifunction," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:232-:d:506025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/3/232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hauck, Jennifer & Görg, Christoph & Varjopuro, Riku & Ratamäki, Outi & Maes, Joachim & Wittmer, Heidi & Jax, Kurt, 2013. "“Maps have an air of authority”: Potential benefits and challenges of ecosystem service maps at different levels of decision making," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 25-32.
    2. Zhuxiao Yu & Erqi Xu & Hongqi Zhang & Erping Shang, 2020. "Spatio-Temporal Coordination and Conflict of Production-Living-Ecology Land Functions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jie Zheng & Guodong Chen & Tiantian Zhang & Mingjing Ding & Binglin Liu & Hao Wang, 2021. "Exploring Spatial Variations in the Relationships between Landscape Functions and Human Activities in Suburban Rural Communities: A Case Study in Jiangning District, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Alena Harbiankova & Lora Gertsberg, 2022. "Information Model for Sustainable Rural Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Lingxiao Sun & Yang Yu & Yuting Gao & Jing He & Xiang Yu & Ireneusz Malik & Malgorzata Wistuba & Ruide Yu, 2021. "Remote Sensing Monitoring and Evaluation of the Temporal and Spatial Changes in the Eco-Environment of a Typical Arid Land of the Tarim Basin in Western China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Xinman Wang & Rong Zhu & Baoqi Che, 2022. "Spatial Optimization of Tourist-Oriented Villages by Space Syntax Based on Population Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Wenzhu Zhou & Dawei Wang & Yiwen Zhang & Hanjing Xu, 2025. "Predicting Rural Industrial Transformation via Coupling Coordination Between Polder-Based Spatial Features and Industrial Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Tianyi Zhao & Yuning Cheng & Yiyang Fan & Xiangnan Fan, 2022. "Functional Tradeoffs and Feature Recognition of Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
    7. Xiangrui Xiong & Yanhui Wang & Melisa Pesoa-Marcilla & Joaquín Sabaté-Bel, 2022. "Dependence on Mountains and Water: Local Characteristics and Regeneration Patterns of Rural Industrial Heritage in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    2. Bark, Rosalind H. & Colloff, Matthew J. & Hatton MacDonald, Darla & Pollino, Carmel A. & Jackson, Sue & Crossman, Neville D., 2016. "Integrated valuation of ecosystem services obtained from restoring water to the environment in a major regulated river basin," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 22(PB), pages 381-391.
    3. Park, Mi Sun & Shin, Seongmin & Lee, Haeun, 2021. "Media frames on urban greening in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Sironen, Susanna & Primmer, Eeva & Leskinen, Pekka & Similä, Jukka & Punttila, Pekka, 2020. "Context sensitive policy instruments: A multi-criteria decision analysis for safeguarding forest habitats in Southwestern Finland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022. "Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Yue Tang & Li Zhu & Xiaokang Wang, 2024. "Quantitative Analysis of the Evolution of Production–Living–Ecological Space in Traditional Villages: A Comparative Study of Rural Areas in Tibet," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Orsi, Francesco & Ciolli, Marco & Primmer, Eeva & Varumo, Liisa & Geneletti, Davide, 2020. "Mapping hotspots and bundles of forest ecosystem services across the European Union," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Jianchun Fu & Shaoliang Zhang, 2021. "Functional Assessment and Coordination Characteristics of Production, Living, Ecological Function—A Case Study of Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Jae-hyuck Lee & HaeOk Choi, 2020. "An Analysis of Public Complaints to Evaluate Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, February.
    10. Geange, Shane & Townsend, Michael & Clark, Dana & Ellis, Joanne I. & Lohrer, Andrew M., 2019. "Communicating the value of marine conservation using an ecosystem service matrix approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 150-163.
    11. Rongxi Peng & Tao Liu & Guangzhong Cao, 2023. "Valuating Multifunctionality of Land Use for Sustainable Development: Framework, Method, and Application," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Barton, D.N. & Kelemen, E. & Dick, J. & Martin-Lopez, B. & Gómez-Baggethun, E. & Jacobs, S. & Hendriks, C.M.A. & Termansen, M. & García- Llorente, M. & Primmer, E. & Dunford, R. & Harrison, P.A. & Tur, 2018. "(Dis) integrated valuation – Assessing the information gaps in ecosystem service appraisals for governance support," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(PC), pages 529-541.
    13. Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Uta Schirpke & Erich Tasser, 2021. "Trends in Ecosystem Services across Europe Due to Land-Use/Cover Changes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Schmidt, Katja & Martín-López, Berta & Phillips, Peter M. & Julius, Eike & Makan, Neville & Walz, Ariane, 2019. "Key landscape features in the provision of ecosystem services: Insights for management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 353-366.
    16. Lingyu Kong & Xiaodong Xu & Wei Wang & Jinxiu Wu & Meiying Zhang, 2021. "Comprehensive Evaluation and Quantitative Research on the Living Protection of Traditional Villages from the Perspective of “Production–Living–Ecology”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, May.
    17. Yue Gao & Linyan Bai & Kefa Zhou & Yanfei Kou & Weiting Yuan & Xiaozhen Zhou & Ziyun Qiu & Dequan Zhao & Zhihong Lv & Qiulan Wu & Feng Zhang & Qing Zhang, 2024. "Study on the Coupling Coordination Degree and Driving Mechanism of “Production-Living-Ecological” Space in Ecologically Fragile Areas: A Case Study of the Turpan–Hami Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    18. Blayac, Thierry & Mathé, Syndhia & Rey-Valette, Hélène & Fontaine, Pascal, 2014. "Perceptions of the services provided by pond fish farming in Lorraine (France)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 115-123.
    19. Dong Han & Jiajun Qiao & Qiankun Zhu, 2021. "Rural-Spatial Restructuring Promoted by Land-Use Transitions: A Case Study of Zhulin Town in Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-28, February.
    20. Kim, Ilkwon & Lee, Jae-hyuck & Kwon, Hyuksoo, 2021. "Participatory ecosystem service assessment to enhance environmental decision-making in a border city of South Korea," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:3:p:232-:d:506025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.