IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i7p374-d1695834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bridging the Distance: Spatial and Social Factors Influencing Audit Quality and Auditor Independence in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Jomjai Sampet

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Naruanard Sarapaivanich

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand)

  • Jiradacha Wanchuplow

    (Department of Accountancy, Faculty of Management Sciences, Chiangmai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai 50300, Thailand)

Abstract

Audit quality is crucial, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), due to their significant economic role. This study examined how spatial distance (physical separation) and social distance (perceived dissimilarity) between auditors and SME clients influence audit quality, focusing on technical quality (the tangible outputs of auditing) and process quality (the manner of service delivery). Using data from 449 SME executives across Thailand, the study investigated the mediating role of auditor independence within these relationships. The results from structural equation modeling revealed that spatial distance has no direct impact on audit quality but a negative effect on perceived auditor independence, which, in turn, diminishes audit quality indirectly. Conversely, social distance negatively impacts both technical and process quality directly and indirectly through auditor independence. The findings suggest that despite technological advancements facilitating remote auditing, maintaining some physical interaction remains vital for preserving client trust. Additionally, aligning auditor–client social similarities significantly enhances audit quality perceptions. This study provides practical implications for audit firms in managing client interactions effectively, particularly within SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jomjai Sampet & Naruanard Sarapaivanich & Jiradacha Wanchuplow, 2025. "Bridging the Distance: Spatial and Social Factors Influencing Audit Quality and Auditor Independence in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:374-:d:1695834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/374/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/374/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bennett, G. Bradley & Hatfield, Richard C., 2018. "Staff auditors' proclivity for computer-mediated communication with clients and its effect on skeptical behavior," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 68, pages 42-57.
    2. Veena L. Brown & Jodi L. Gissel & Daniel Gordon Neely, 2016. "Audit quality indicators: perceptions of junior-level auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(8/9), pages 949-980, September.
    3. Sabrina Gong & Nam Ho & Justin Yiqiang Jin & Kiridaran Kanagaretnam, 2022. "Audit quality and COVID-19 restrictions," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1017-1037, June.
    4. Angus Duff, 2009. "Measuring audit quality in an era of change: An empirical investigation of UK audit market stakeholders in 2002 and 2005," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(5), pages 400-422, May.
    5. Bin N. Srinidhi & Ferdinand A. Gul, 2007. "The Differential Effects of Auditors' Nonaudit and Audit Fees on Accrual Quality," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 595-629, June.
    6. DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth, 1981. "Auditor size and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 183-199, December.
    7. Beck, Matthew J. & Gunn, Joshua L. & Hallman, Nicholas, 2019. "The geographic decentralization of audit firms and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1).
    8. Veena L. Brown & Jodi L. Gissel & Daniel Gordon Neely, 2016. "Audit quality indicators: perceptions of junior-level auditors," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 31(8/9), pages 949-980, September.
    9. repec:eme:maj000:maj-11-2021-3383 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. repec:eme:maj000:maj-01-2016-1300 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Knechel, W. Robert & Thomas, Edward & Driskill, Matthew, 2020. "Understanding financial auditing from a service perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    2. Kiridaran Kanagaretnam & Gopal V. Krishnan & Gerald J. Lobo & Robert Mathieu, 2011. "Audit Quality and the Market Valuation of Banks’ Allowance for Loan Losses," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 161-193, September.
    3. Li, Jiaxin & Wang, Chaofan & Peng, Jiachao & Shuai, Jing & Shuai, Chuanmin, 2025. "Impoverished villagers’ solar PV adoption in rural China: A perspective of agent intervention, economic benefit perception and sense of community," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    4. Silvia Ferramosca & Giulio Greco & Marco Allegrini, 2017. "External audit and goodwill write-off," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 907-934, December.
    5. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Nicola Raimo & Víctor Amor-Esteban & Filippo Vitolla, 2023. "Board committees and non-financial information assurance services," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(1), pages 1-42, March.
    6. Roger Meuwissen & Reiner Quick, 2009. "Abschlussprüfung und Beratung - Eine experimentelle Analyse der Auswirkungen auf Unabhängigkeitswahrnehmungen deutscher Aufsichtsräte," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 382-415, June.
    7. Ferramosca, Silvia & Allegrini, Marco, 2021. "Impairment or amortization of goodwill? An analysis of CFO perceptions of goodwill accounting," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 816-828.
    8. Hendra Susanto & Sri Mulyani & Citra Sukmadilaga & Erlane K. Ghani, 2022. "Sustaining Investigative Audit Quality through Auditor Competency and Digital Forensic Support: A Consensus Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Dongshan Ma & Shengqiang Zhang & Jiayu Zhao, 2022. "The High-Speed Railway Opening and Audit Fees: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Li, Chan & Raman, K.K. & Sun, Lili & Wu, Da, 2017. "The effect of ambiguity in an auditing standard on auditor independence: Evidence from nonaudit fees and SOX 404 opinions," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 37-51.
    11. Chen, Long & Krishnan, Gopal V. & Yu, Wei, 2018. "The relation between audit fee cuts during the global financial crisis and earnings quality and audit quality," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-31.
    12. Jenna J. Burke & Rani Hoitash & Udi Hoitash, 2020. "The Use and Characteristics of Foreign Component Auditors in U.S. Multinational Audits: Insights from Form AP Disclosures," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 2398-2437, December.
    13. Climent-Serrano, Salvador & Bustos-Contell, Elisabeth & Labatut-Serer, Gregorio & Rey-Martí, Andrea, 2018. "Low-cost trends in audit fees and their impact on service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 345-350.
    14. Reiner Quick & Matthias Sattler, 2012. "Erwiderung auf Hansrudi Lenz: Eine wissenschaftsethische Anmerkung zum Beitrag „Beeinträchtigen Beratungsleistungen die Urteilsfreiheit des Abschlussprüfers? Zum Einfluss von Beratungshonoraren auf di," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 271-279, May.
    15. Timothy B. Bell & Monika Causholli & W. Robert Knechel, 2015. "Audit Firm Tenure, Non‐Audit Services, and Internal Assessments of Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 53(3), pages 461-509, June.
    16. Der-Fen Huang & Ming-Lei Chang, 2016. "Do auditor-provided tax services improve the relation between tax-related internal control and book-tax differences?," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 177-199, June.
    17. Michal Ambroziak & Adam Chmielewski, 2011. "Impairment of assets and the cost of capital is the linkage of financial and accounting management (Utrata wartosci aktywow i koszt kapitalu - powiazanie rachunkowosci finansowej i zarzadczej)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(34), pages 211-220.
    18. Laitinen, Erkki K. & Laitinen, Teija, 2015. "A probability tree model of audit quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 665-677.
    19. AYOUB, Maysam, 2023. "Audit firms’ network structure and audit quality," Working Papers 2023008, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    20. Ionela-Corina CHERSAN, 2019. "Audit Quality and Several of Its Determinants," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(153), pages 1-93.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:374-:d:1695834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.