IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i7p373-d1695311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Margin Trading and Cryptocurrency Investment Among U.S. Investors: Evidence from the National Financial Capability Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ferdous Ahmmed

    (Department of Finance, Economics, and Risk Management, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897, USA)

  • Boakye Yam Boadi

    (School of Financial Planning, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

  • Michael Guillemette

    (School of Financial Planning, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between margin trading and cryptocurrency investment using data from the 2018 and 2021 waves of the National Financial Capability Study (NFCS) Investor Survey. Guided by behavioral finance theory, which suggests that cognitive biases may influence risk-taking, the study explored whether margin loan use and margin calls are associated with higher cryptocurrency participation. Margin loans are inherently risky, as they must be repaid regardless of investment outcomes, and margin calls are triggered when an investor’s equity falls below a required threshold. The results showed a positive and statistically significant association between margin activity and cryptocurrency investment. Specifically, individuals with a margin loan were 17 percentage points more likely to invest in cryptocurrency, while those who have experienced a margin call were 23 percentage points more likely. Given the extreme volatility of cryptocurrencies, these results highlight the increased risks investors face when using leverage in speculative markets. The analysis is based on cross-sectional data from U.S. investors; therefore, the findings should be interpreted as correlational rather than causal.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferdous Ahmmed & Boakye Yam Boadi & Michael Guillemette, 2025. "Margin Trading and Cryptocurrency Investment Among U.S. Investors: Evidence from the National Financial Capability Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:373-:d:1695311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/373/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/7/373/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:373-:d:1695311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.