IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i6p321-d1676243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Audit Committee Oversight on Investor Rationality, Price Expectations, Human Capital, and Research and Development Expense

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Abraham

    (Huizenga College of Business, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Ave, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA)

  • Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu

    (Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Bengaluru 560100, Karnataka, India)

  • Hani El-Chaarani

    (School of Business Administration, Beirut Arab University (Tripoli Campus), Beirut 11072809, Lebanon)

Abstract

Audit committees monitor the actions of managers as they pursue the goal of shareholder wealth maximization. The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of audit committee oversight on novel aspects of firm performance, including investor rationality, price expectations, human capital, and research and development expenses. It extends the literature to non-financial outcomes of audit committee oversight. The literature thus far has focused on the financial effects of audit committee oversight, such as return on assets, return on equity, risk, debt capacity, and firm value. Data was collected from 588 publicly traded firms in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry and energy industry from 2010 to 2022. Audit oversight was measured by the novel measurement of the frequency of the term ‘audit committee’ in annual reports and Form 10Ks from the SeekEdgar database. COMPUSTAT provided the remainder of the data. Panel Data fixed-effects models were used to analyze the data. Audit committee oversight significantly increased investor rationality, significantly reduced price expectations, and significantly increased human capital investment. An inverted U-shaped relationship occurred for audit committee oversight and research and development expenses, with audit oversight first increasing research and development expenses, then decreasing them. The study makes several contributions. First, the study uses a novel measure of audit oversight. Second, the study predicts the effect of audit committee oversight on unexplored non-financial measures, such as human capital and research and development expense. Third, the study offers a current test of the Miller model, as the last tests were performed over 20 years ago. Fourth, the study examines the impact of auditing on market measures that have not been explored in the literature, such as investor rationality and short selling.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Abraham & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Hani El-Chaarani, 2025. "The Impact of Audit Committee Oversight on Investor Rationality, Price Expectations, Human Capital, and Research and Development Expense," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:321-:d:1676243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/321/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/321/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dewi Mustika Ratu & Dian Kartika Rahajeng, 2024. "Anti-corruption policy and earnings management: do women in monitoring roles matter?," Asian Journal of Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(4), pages 340-357, July.
    2. Karl B. Diether & Christopher J. Malloy & Anna Scherbina, 2002. "Differences of Opinion and the Cross Section of Stock Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(5), pages 2113-2141, October.
    3. Peter Baxter & Julie Cotter, 2009. "Audit committees and earnings quality," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 49(2), pages 267-290, June.
    4. Narasimhan Jegadeesh & Sheridan Titman, 2001. "Profitability of Momentum Strategies: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(2), pages 699-720, April.
    5. Mahmoud Lari Dashtbayaz & Mahdi Salehi & Alieyh Mirzaei & Hamideh Nazaridavaji, 2020. "The impact of corporate governance on intellectual capitals efficiency in Iran," International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 749-766, July.
    6. Mahmoud Lari Dashtbayaz & Mahdi Salehi & Alieyh Mirzaei & Hamideh Nazaridavaji, 2020. "The impact of corporate governance on intellectual capitals efficiency in Iran," International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 749-766, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onishchenko, Olena & Zhao, Jing & Kongahawatte, Sampath & Kuruppuarachchi, Duminda, 2024. "Investor heterogeneity and anchoring-induced momentum," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    2. Avramov, D. & Ge, S. & Li, S. & Linton, O. B., 2025. "Dual Industry Effects and Cross-Stock Predictability," Janeway Institute Working Papers 2506, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Phillip J. McKnight & Steven K. Todd, 2006. "Analyst Forecasts and the Cross Section of European Stock Returns," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 201-224, December.
    4. Hans-Peter Burghof & Felix Prothmann, 2011. "The 52-week high strategy and information uncertainty," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 25(4), pages 345-378, December.
    5. Guo, Hui & Qiu, Buhui, 2014. "Options-implied variance and future stock returns," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 93-113.
    6. Al-Nasseri, Alya & Menla Ali, Faek, 2018. "What does investors' online divergence of opinion tell us about stock returns and trading volume?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 166-178.
    7. Turan G. Bali & Andriy Bodnaruk & Anna Scherbina & Yi Tang, 2018. "Unusual News Flow and the Cross Section of Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4137-4155, September.
    8. Ling Cen & K. C. John Wei & Liyan Yang, 2017. "Disagreement, Underreaction, and Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1214-1231, April.
    9. Amit Goyal, 2012. "Empirical cross-sectional asset pricing: a survey," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 26(1), pages 3-38, March.
    10. Chaonan Lin & Nien‐Tzu Yang & Robin K. Chou & Kuan‐Cheng Ko, 2022. "A timing momentum strategy," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1339-1379, April.
    11. LUCUȚ CAPRAȘ Isabella & RUS Alexandra Ioana Daniela & ACHIM Monica Violeta, 2023. "The Impact of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital. Empirical Evidence from Romanian Companies," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    12. Zareei, Abalfazl, 2021. "Cross-momentum: Tracking idiosyncratic shocks," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 177-199.
    13. Aboulamer, Anas & Kryzanowski, Lawrence, 2016. "Are idiosyncratic volatility and MAX priced in the Canadian market?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 20-36.
    14. John A. Doukas & Phillip J. McKnight, 2005. "European Momentum Strategies, Information Diffusion, and Investor Conservatism," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 11(3), pages 313-338, June.
    15. Richardson, Scott & Tuna, Irem & Wysocki, Peter, 2010. "Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 410-454, December.
    16. Avramov, D. & Ge, S. & Li, S. & Linton, O. B., 2025. "Dual Industry Effects and Cross-Stock Predictability," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2512, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    17. Tobias J. Moskowitz, 2021. "Asset Pricing and Sports Betting," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(6), pages 3153-3209, December.
    18. Isakin, Maksim & Pu, Xiaoling, 2023. "Dispersion in news sentiment and corporate bond returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    19. Nagel, Stefan, 2005. "Short sales, institutional investors and the cross-section of stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 277-309, November.
    20. Guo, Hui & Savickas, Robert, 2006. "Idiosyncratic Volatility, Stock Market Volatility, and Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 24, pages 43-56, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:321-:d:1676243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.