IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i6p318-d1675636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Self-Sufficiency in Basic Raw Materials of Metallurgical Companies on Required Return and Capitalization: The Case of Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Galevskiy

    (Industrial Economics Department, Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Tatyana Ponomarenko

    (Organization and Management Department, Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

  • Pavel Tsiglianu

    (Industrial Economics Department, Empress Catherine II Saint Petersburg Mining University, 199106 Saint Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

This article considers the impact of self-sufficiency in basic raw materials on the level of systematic risk, required return and capitalization on the example of Russian ferrous metallurgy companies. The methods applied include classical approaches to determining beta coefficient, required return and capitalization, as well as correlation–regression analysis performed in the Python programming language (version 3.0, libraries: Numpy, Pandas, Matplotlib, Datetime, Statistics, Scipy, Bambi). The study revealed an inverse relationship between the self-sufficiency of ferrous metallurgy companies in iron ore and coking coal and their systematic risk. That was confirmed by the developed regression model. The presence of this dependence directly indicates the need to consider self-sufficiency when assessing a company’s required return and capitalization. The acquisition of the Tikhov coal mine by PJSC Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works (MMK) led to an increase in capitalization not only due to additional profit from the new asset, but also due to a decrease in the required return caused by the growth of the company’s self-sufficiency in coking coal. The proposed approach contributes to a more accurate assessment of the company’s capitalization and creates additional incentives for vertical integration transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Galevskiy & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Pavel Tsiglianu, 2025. "The Impact of Self-Sufficiency in Basic Raw Materials of Metallurgical Companies on Required Return and Capitalization: The Case of Russia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:318-:d:1675636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Dmitrieva & Victoria Solovyova, 2024. "A Taxonomy of Mineral Resource Projects in the Arctic: A Path to Sustainable Financing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Tatyana Semenova & Juan Yair Martínez Santoyo, 2025. "Determining Priority Areas for the Technological Development of Oil Companies in Mexico," Resources, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Banz, Rolf W., 1981. "The relationship between return and market value of common stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 3-18, March.
    4. Jian Chen & Chen He & Jing Zhang, 2017. "Time-Varying Variance Risk Premium and the Predictability of Chinese Stock Market Return," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 1734-1748, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Fidanza & Ottorino Morresi, 2021. "Size and Value Anomalies in European Bank Stocks," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(12), pages 227-227, July.
    2. Constantinos Antoniou & John A. Doukas & Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, 2016. "Investor Sentiment, Beta, and the Cost of Equity Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 347-367, February.
    3. Radosław Kurach, 2013. "Does Beta Explain Global Equity Market Volatility – Some Empirical Evidence," Contemporary Economics, Vizja University, vol. 7(2), June.
    4. Chang, Chia-Lin & Hsu, Hui-Kuang, 2013. "Modelling Volatility Size Effects for Firm Performance: The Impact of Chinese Tourists to Taiwan," MPRA Paper 45691, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Siddiqi, Hammad, 2015. "Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: A Unified Explanation for Equity Puzzles," MPRA Paper 68729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Abugri, Benjamin A. & Dutta, Sandip, 2014. "Are we overestimating REIT idiosyncratic risk? Analysis of pricing effects and persistence," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 249-259.
    7. Grossman, Richard, 2017. "Stocks for the Long Run: New Monthly Indices of British Equities, 1869-1929," CEPR Discussion Papers 12121, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Dimitrios D. Thomakos & Michail S. Koubouros, 2011. "The Role of Realised Volatility in the Athens Stock Exchange," Multinational Finance Journal, Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 15(1-2), pages 87-124, March - J.
    9. Eero Pätäri & Timo Leivo, 2017. "A Closer Look At Value Premium: Literature Review And Synthesis," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 79-168, February.
    10. John H. Cochrane, 1999. "New facts in finance," Economic Perspectives, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, vol. 23(Q III), pages 36-58.
    11. Chongsoo An & John J. Cheh & Il-woon Kim, 2017. "Do Value Stocks Outperform Growth Stocks in the U.S. Stock Market?," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 1-7.
    12. Turan G. Bali & Robert F. Engle & Yi Tang, 2017. "Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3760-3779, November.
    13. Wen, Danyan & Zhang, Zihao & Nie, Jing & Cao, Yang, 2024. "Investor attention and anomalies: Evidence from the Chinese stock market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    14. Tim Brailsford & Clive Gaunt & Michael A O’Brien, 2012. "Size and book-to-market factors in Australia," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(2), pages 261-281, August.
    15. Seguin, P. J. & Smoller, M. M., 1997. "Share price and mortality: An empirical evaluation of newly listed Nasdaq stocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 333-363, September.
    16. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 689-725.
    17. Horowitz, Joel L. & Loughran, Tim & Savin, N. E., 2000. "The disappearing size effect," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 83-100, March.
    18. Azzi, Sarah & Bird, Ron, 2005. "Prophets during boom and gloom downunder," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 337-367, February.
    19. Chendi Ni & Yuying Li & Peter A. Forsyth, 2023. "Neural Network Approach to Portfolio Optimization with Leverage Constraints:a Case Study on High Inflation Investment," Papers 2304.05297, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    20. Wolfgang Aussenegg & Andreas Grünbichler, 1999. "Der Size-Effekt am Österreichischen Aktienmarkt," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 51(7), pages 636-661, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:318-:d:1675636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.