IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i6p311-d1672806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationships Between Corporate Control Environment and Stakeholders That Mediate Pressure on Independent Auditors in France

Author

Listed:
  • Giemegerman Carhuapomachacon

    (IESEG School of Management, Université Catholique, 59000 Lille, France)

  • Joshua Onome Imoniana

    (School of Economics, Management and Accounting, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

  • Cristiane Benetti

    (Finance Department, ICN Business School, CEREFIGE, Université de Lorraine, 54000 Nancy, France)

  • Vilma Geni Slomski

    (UniFECAP—Centro Universitário Alvares Penteado, Sao Paulo 01502-001, Brazil)

  • Valmor Slomski

    (School of Economics, Management and Accounting, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-010, Brazil)

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine how relationships between corporate control environments and stakeholders mediate the different dimensions of pressure on auditor independence. In France, two (joint) auditors are required by law for listed companies. In this context, we analyze the experiences of higher-echelon professionals of audit firms, controllers, and managers who could elucidate the essence of pressure on auditor independence in their lived environment. An interpretative approach and empirical analysis were adopted for this study to expand on the literature and proffer an answer to the following research question: How does the relationship between a control environment and a stakeholder mediate the pressures on auditor independence? Interviews involved seven participants, mainly higher-echelon professionals of Big Four firms, as well as two members of auditee organizations, and a member of an audit committee. In addition, the narratives from the documents gathered from the EU audit legislation implementation database constitute our data corpus. Thematic coding was used to organize the results. The findings reveal that control environment best practices and down-to-earth corporate governance policies, participated in by both auditors and audited organizations, cushion the pressures on auditors. This, in turn, presents a positive and significant impact on auditor independence. Overall, the dimensions that mediate the pressures on auditors are as follows: the consciousness of pressure in itself; the reputation and experience of the audit firm; and the interactions between the auditors and corporate governance. Other factors include the cordiality of the relationship between the auditor and corporate management and the resulting healthy end of the negotiation between auditors and auditees. This study contributes to the theory and practical discussion of the relationships between the corporate control environment, corporate governance, auditing, and pressure on auditor independence.

Suggested Citation

  • Giemegerman Carhuapomachacon & Joshua Onome Imoniana & Cristiane Benetti & Vilma Geni Slomski & Valmor Slomski, 2025. "Relationships Between Corporate Control Environment and Stakeholders That Mediate Pressure on Independent Auditors in France," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:311-:d:1672806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/6/311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:311-:d:1672806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.