IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v17y2024i11p513-d1521918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Drivers of Corporate Sustainability Performance Disclosures Using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Najul Laskar

    (School of Management, IILM University, Knowledge Park 2, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India)

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the factors influencing the corporate sustainability performance disclosures of companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 framework. This research is based on a sample of 434 firms listed on the BSE from 2017 to 2022. According to the content analysis method, the disclosure score of 434 non-financial companies is 79% (approximately), suggesting that, on an average, the sample companies have revealed 79% of the GRI-specified elements in their sustainability reports. The outcomes of the regression models indicate that profitability, firm size, innovation, board size, gender diversity, sustainability committee, and industry type are major drivers of corporate sustainability performance disclosure. Furthermore, research identified significant differences in the determinants of such practices between high-polluting and low-polluting companies. This research aims to elucidate the intricate dynamics affecting corporate sustainability performance by examining a diverse array of concerns. It employs meticulous data analysis to identify critical elements influencing sustainability disclosure. These findings may assist corporate managers, investors, policymakers, and stakeholders in comprehending the critical aspects to consider when formulating strategies that promote sustainability and enhance long-term value maximization.

Suggested Citation

  • Najul Laskar, 2024. "Assessing the Drivers of Corporate Sustainability Performance Disclosures Using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Framework," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:513-:d:1521918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/17/11/513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dulacha G. Barako & Phil Hancock & H. Y. Izan, 2006. "Factors Influencing Voluntary Corporate Disclosure by Kenyan Companies," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 107-125, March.
    2. Robert Padgett & Jose Galan, 2010. "The Effect of R&D Intensity on Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(3), pages 407-418, May.
    3. Chau, Gerald & Gray, Sidney J., 2010. "Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 93-109.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melinda Timea FÜLÖP & Mirela-Oana PINTEA, 2014. "Effects Of The New Regulation And Corporate Governance Of The Audit Profession," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 545-554, July.
    2. Rupjyoti Saha & K. C. Kabra, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Voluntary Disclosure: A Synthesis of Empirical Studies," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 117-138, July.
    3. Hichem Khlif & Kamran Ahmed & Mohsen Souissi, 2017. "Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 376-403, August.
    4. Borrero-Domínguez, Cinta & Cortijo-Gallego, Virginia & Escobar-Rodríguez, Tomás, 2024. "Digital transformation voluntary disclosure: Insights from leading European companies," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Ghada A. Altarawneh & Asma’a Omar Al-Halalmeh, 2020. "Conformity of Annual Reports to an Integrated Reporting Framework: ASE Listed Companies," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu, 2013. "How Do Ownership Features Affect Corporate Governance Disclosure ? - The Case of Banking System," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 9(2), pages 37-51, April.
    7. Poonam Mahajan & Gurbinder Singh, 2024. "Voluntary Disclosure, Cost of Capital and Performance of Indian Commercial Banks," Vision, , vol. 28(5), pages 659-670, November.
    8. Ahmadi, Ali & Nakaa, Nejia & Bouri, Abdelfettah, 2018. "Chief Executive Officer attributes, board structures, gender diversity and firm performance among French CAC 40 listed firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 218-226.
    9. Stefanescu Cristina Alexandrina, 2012. "Ownership Concentration And Corporate Governance Disclosure -The Case Of Financial Institutions," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 830-836, July.
    10. repec:uii:jcauii:v:1:y:2019:i:3:p:173-187 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shinu Vig, 2024. "Environmental disclosures by Indian companies: role of board characteristics and board effectiveness," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 16-31, March.
    12. Liao, Lin & Luo, Le & Tang, Qingliang, 2015. "Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(4), pages 409-424.
    13. Petra F. A. Dilling & Sinan Caykoylu, 2019. "Determinants of Companies that Disclose High-Quality Integrated Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-31, July.
    14. Luigi Lepore & Loris Landriani & Sabrina Pisano & Gabriella D’Amore & Stefano Pozzoli, 2023. "Corporate governance in the digital age: the role of social media and board independence in CSR disclosure. Evidence from Italian listed companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 749-785, September.
    15. Ezhilarasi G. & K. C. Kabra, 2017. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Attributes on Environmental Disclosures: Evidence from India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 10(1), pages 24-43, June.
    16. Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & Emma García‐Meca, 2020. "Internal corporate governance strength as a mechanism for achieving sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1189-1198, September.
    17. repec:rej:journl:v:16:y:2013:i:47:p:127-146 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Kelly Anh Vu & Greg Tower & Glennda Scully, 2011. "Corporate communication for Vietnamese listed firms," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 125-146, July.
    19. Samaha, Khaled & Khlif, Hichem & Hussainey, Khaled, 2015. "The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 13-28.
    20. Ebrahim, Ahmed & Fattah, Tarek Abdel, 2015. "Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 46-60.
    21. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    22. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:513-:d:1521918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.