IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v13y2025i2p96-d1669761.html

The Effect of Fat Tails on Rules for Optimal Pairs Trading: Performance Implications of Regime Switching with Poisson Events

Author

Listed:
  • Pablo García-Risueño

    (General Directorate of Investments, VidaCaixa (Group CaixaBank), C/Juan Gris 2-8, 08014 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Eduardo Ortas

    (Accounting and Finance Department, Faculty of Business and Public Management, University of Zaragoza, Rda. Misericordia, 1, 22001 Huesca, Spain)

  • José M. Moneva

    (Accounting and Finance Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zaragoza, Gran Vía de Don Santiago Ramón y Cajal, 2, 50005 Zaragoza, Spain)

Abstract

This study examines the impact that fat-tailed distributions of the spread residuals have on the optimal orders for pairs trading of stocks and cryptocurrencies. Using daily data from selected pairs, the spread dynamics has been modeled through a mean-reverting Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process and investigates how deviations from normality affect strategy design and profitability. Specifically, we compared four fat-tailed distributions—Lévy stable, generalized hyperbolic, Johnson’s S U , and non-centered Student’s t—and showed how they modify optimal entry and exit thresholds, and performance metrics. The main findings reveal that the proposed pairs trading strategy correctly captures some key stylized facts of residual spreads such as large jumps, skewness, and excess Kurtosis. Interestingly, we considered regime-switching behaviors to account for structural changes in market dynamics, providing empirical evidence that optimal trading rules are regime-dependent and significantly influenced by the residual distribution’s tail behavior. Unlike conventional approaches, we optimized the entry signal and link heavy tails not only to volatility clustering but also to the nonlinearity in switching regimes. These findings suggest the need to account for distributional properties and dynamic regimes when designing robust pairs trading strategies, providing a more realistic and effective framework of these strategies in highly volatile and non-normal markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Pablo García-Risueño & Eduardo Ortas & José M. Moneva, 2025. "The Effect of Fat Tails on Rules for Optimal Pairs Trading: Performance Implications of Regime Switching with Poisson Events," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:96-:d:1669761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/96/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/13/2/96/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suhan Altay & Katia Colaneri & Zehra Eksi, 2017. "Pairs Trading under Drift Uncertainty and Risk Penalization," Papers 1704.06697, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2018.
    2. Sühan Altay & Katia Colaneri & Zehra Eksi, 2018. "Pairs Trading Under Drift Uncertainty And Risk Penalization," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(07), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Luana Carneiro & Luís Gomes & Cristina Lopes & Cláudia Pereira, 2025. "Spillovers Between Euronext Stock Indices: The COVID-19 Effect," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Hossein Rad & Rand Kwong Yew Low & Robert Faff, 2016. "The profitability of pairs trading strategies: distance, cointegration and copula methods," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(10), pages 1541-1558, October.
    5. Simonato, Jean-Guy, 2012. "GARCH processes with skewed and leptokurtic innovations: Revisiting the Johnson Su case," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 213-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flavio Angelini & Katia Colaneri & Stefano Herzel & Marco Nicolosi, 2021. "Implicit incentives for fund managers with partial information," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 539-561, October.
    2. E. Boguslavskaya & M. Boguslavsky & D. Muravey, 2020. "Trading multiple mean reversion," Papers 2009.09816, arXiv.org.
    3. Suhan Altay & Katia Colaneri & Zehra Eksi, 2019. "Optimal Convergence Trading with Unobservable Pricing Errors," Papers 1910.01438, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    4. Katia Colaneri & Stefano Herzel & Marco Nicolosi, 2021. "The value of knowing the market price of risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 101-131, April.
    5. Sühan Altay & Katia Colaneri & Zehra Eksi, 2021. "Optimal convergence trading with unobservable pricing errors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 133-161, April.
    6. Bandini, Elena & Calvia, Alessandro & Colaneri, Katia, 2022. "Stochastic filtering of a pure jump process with predictable jumps and path-dependent local characteristics," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 396-435.
    7. Alessandra Cretarola & Benedetta Salterini, 2023. "Indifference pricing of pure endowments in a regime-switching market model," Papers 2301.13575, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2025.
    8. Katia Colaneri & Alessandra Cretarola & Benedetta Salterini, 2021. "Optimal Investment and Proportional Reinsurance in a Regime-Switching Market Model under Forward Preferences," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Christos Floros & Konstantinos Gkillas & Christoforos Konstantatos & Athanasios Tsagkanos, 2020. "Realized Measures to Explain Volatility Changes over Time," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Alexander Shulzhenko, 2023. "Copula-based deviation measure of cointegrated financial assets," Papers 2312.02081, arXiv.org.
    11. Beatrice D. Simo-Kengne & Kofi A. Ababio & Jules Mba & Ur Koumba, 2018. "Behavioral portfolio selection and optimization: an application to international stocks," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 32(3), pages 311-328, August.
    12. Ye, Cheng & Qiu, Yanjun & Lu, Guohao & Hou, Yawen, 2018. "Quantitative strategy for the Chinese commodity futures market based on a dynamic weighted money flow model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 512(C), pages 1009-1018.
    13. Jean-Guy Simonato & Lars Stentoft, 2015. "Which pricing approach for options under GARCH with non-normal innovations?," CREATES Research Papers 2015-32, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    14. Baiquan Ma & Robert Ślepaczuk, 2022. "The profitability of pairs trading strategies on Hong-Kong stock market: distance, cointegration, and correlation methods," Working Papers 2022-02, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    15. Anna Ananova & Rama Cont & Renyuan Xu, 2020. "Model-free Analysis of Dynamic Trading Strategies," Papers 2011.02870, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    16. Endres, Sylvia & Stübinger, Johannes, 2018. "A flexible regime switching model with pairs trading application to the S&P 500 high-frequency stock returns," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 07/2018, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    17. Emmanuel Afuecheta & Saralees Nadarajah & Stephen Chan, 2021. "A Statistical Analysis of Global Economies Using Time Varying Copulas," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 1167-1194, December.
    18. Andreas Mikkelsen, 2018. "Pairs trading: the case of Norwegian seafood companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(3), pages 303-318, January.
    19. Law, K.F. & Li, W.K. & Yu, Philip L.H., 2018. "A single-stage approach for cointegration-based pairs trading," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 177-184.
    20. Hanxiong Zhang & Andrew Urquhart, 2020. "Do momentum and reversal strategies work in commodity futures? A comprehensive study," Review of Behavioral Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 375-409, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:96-:d:1669761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.