IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i3p82-d1176320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disclosure of Key Audit Matters: European Listed Companies’ Evidence on Related Parties Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Lioara-Veronica Pasc

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 16 Pestalozzi Street, 300115 Timisoara, Romania)

  • Camelia-Daniela Hategan

    (Department of Accounting and Audit, ECREB—East European Center for Research in Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, 16 Pestalozzi Street, 300115 Timisoara, Romania)

Abstract

The growing expenses, dependence on IT for business operations, and growing requirements regarding related party transaction (RPT) reporting impose the need for increased attention to this area. The paper’s objective is to examine the nature of RPTs, identified by auditors as a key audit matter (KAMs), challenges and solutions to problems related to risk management, and the detection of factors affecting audit quality. The research methodology is qualitative, with an analysis of the level of disclosure of KAMs reported by auditors from the Related Parties category, grouped by type of auditors, their opinion, year, country, and fields of activity. Data were collected from the Audit Analytics database and filtered by category KAM: Related parties, period 2013–2021. The selection resulted in 111 companies reporting 248 KAMs related to RPTs, from which most were reported in 2017–2019. Of these, nearly two-thirds were reported by auditors from the Big4 category. Most KAMs were reported by companies in the U.K., Germany, and France, and the industries with the most KAMs were finance, insurance, and real estate. In conclusion, there are factors that can affect audit quality due to the reporting of RPTs, but by identifying them, the audit process can be better managed, thus increasing its efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Lioara-Veronica Pasc & Camelia-Daniela Hategan, 2023. "Disclosure of Key Audit Matters: European Listed Companies’ Evidence on Related Parties Transactions," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:82-:d:1176320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/3/82/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/3/82/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muttanachai Suttipun, 2021. "Impact of key audit matters (KAMs) reporting on audit quality: evidence from Thailand," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(5), pages 869-882, June.
    2. Mark Kohlbeck & Brian W. Mayhew, 2017. "Are Related Party Transactions Red Flags?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 900-928, June.
    3. Wang, Hong-Da & Cho, Chia-Ching & Lin, Chan-Jane, 2019. "Related party transactions, business relatedness, and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 411-425.
    4. Van Cuong Dang & Quang Khai Nguyen, 2022. "Audit committee characteristics and tax avoidance: Evidence from an emerging economy," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2023263-202, December.
    5. repec:eme:maj000:maj-11-2019-2462 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-10-2020-0210 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Cheung, Yan-Leung & Qi, Yuehua & Raghavendra Rau, P. & Stouraitis, Aris, 2009. "Buy high, sell low: How listed firms price asset transfers in related party transactions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 914-924, May.
    8. Vida Botes & Mary Low & Aleena Sutton, 2020. "Key audit matters and their implications for the audit environment," International Journal of Economics and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 374-396.
    9. Tomasz Iwanowicz & Bartłomiej Iwanowicz, 2019. "ISA 701 and Materiality Disclosure as Methods to Minimize the Audit Expectation Gap," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Antti Rautiainen & Jani Saastamoinen & Kati Pajunen, 2021. "Do key audit matters (KAMs) matter? Auditors’ perceptions of KAMs and audit quality in Finland," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(3), pages 386-404, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldy Fariz Achsanta & Tastaftiyan Risfandy & Putra Pamungkas & Irwan Trinugroho & Herman Saheruddin, 2021. "Related bank deposits: Good or bad for stability?," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(4), pages 735-751, December.
    2. Kinshuk Saurabh, 2023. "Expropriation mechanisms, corporate governance, and cross-border acquisitions by Indian firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 395-409, December.
    3. Chen, Ching-Lung & Chen, Chung-Yu & Weng, Pei-Yu, 2020. "Do related party transactions always deteriorate earnings informativeness?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Bansal, Shashank & Thenmozhi, M., 2020. "Does Concentrated Founder Ownership Affect Related Party Transactions? Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    5. Lompo, Miaba Louise & Ouoba, Marie Madeleine, 2022. "How they hide money? An investigation on tax evasion of large corporations and wealthy taxpayers," MPRA Paper 113410, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Michael Ryngaert & Shawn Thomas, 2012. "Not All Related Party Transactions (RPTs) Are the Same: Ex Ante Versus Ex Post RPTs," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 845-882, June.
    7. Ria Ria, 2023. "Determinant Factors of Corporate Governance on Company Performance: Mediating Role of Capital Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Keke Bai & Farid Ullah & Muhammad Arif & Sahar Erfanian & Saima Urooge, 2023. "Stakeholder-Centered Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainable Development: Evidence from CSR Practices in the Top Companies by Market Capitalization at Shanghai Stock Exchange of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Abdullah Almutairi & Baban Eulaiwi & Robert Evans & Grantley Taylor, 2023. "Tax Haven Use and Related‐Party Transactions: Evidence from Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(4), pages 352-374, December.
    10. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2020. "Related Party Transactions, State Ownership, the Cost of Corporate Debt, and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Vietnam," OSF Preprints y5qj3, Center for Open Science.
    11. Masood Fooladi Chaghadari Author_Email: foladim57@gmail.com & Zaleha Abdul Shukor, 2011. "Corporate Governance And Disclosure Of Related Party Transactions," 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding 2011-267, Conference Master Resources.
    12. Giovanna Gavana & Pietro Gottardo & Anna Maria Moisello, 2022. "Related Party Transactions and Earnings Management: The Moderating Effect of ESG Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Guang-Zheng Chen, 2020. "Related Party Transactions and Opinion Shopping," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9.
    14. Redhwan Ahmed Al-Dhamari & Bakr Al-Gamrh & Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail & Samihah Saad Haji Ismail, 2018. "Related party transactions and audit fees: the role of the internal audit function," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(1), pages 187-212, March.
    15. Hongfeng Sun & Meng Yang & Lidan Li & Chang Liu, 2023. "Corporate Charitable Donations, Earnings Performance and Tax Avoidance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Dou, Huan & Liu, Yuanyuan & Shi, Yaru & Xu, Hanwen, 2022. "Are related-party transactions beneficial or detrimental in emerging markets? New evidence of financial services agreements from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. El-Helaly, Moataz & Al-Dah, Bilal, 2022. "Related party transactions and dividend payouts," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Jiang, Fuxiu & Xia, Xiaoxue & Zheng, Xiaojia, 2021. "Does controlling shareholders' share pledging raise suppliers' eyebrows?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    19. Shah, Muhammad Hashim & Xiao, Zuoping & Abdullah, & Quresh, Shakir & Ahmad, Mushtaq, 2020. "Internal pyramid structure, contract enforcement, minority investor protection, and firms’ performance: Evidence from emerging economies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Sung C. Bae & Taek Ho Kwon, 2021. "Do firms benefit from related party transactions with foreign affiliates? Evidence from Korea," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 945-965, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:82-:d:1176320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.